<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: ricardo81</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=ricardo81</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2026 18:58:37 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=ricardo81" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ricardo81 in "What came after the 486?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Ah. There's a whole generation of people who never enjoyed the Intel inside / Pentium jingle 
<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sVafplZCsjU" rel="nofollow">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sVafplZCsjU</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2026 10:21:07 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47528673</link><dc:creator>ricardo81</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47528673</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47528673</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ricardo81 in "How Much Money Jeff Bezos Made Since You Started Reading This Page"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>So basically the time it takes him to make a cup of tea he's surpassed the net worth of 99% of the world.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2026 11:11:23 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47273517</link><dc:creator>ricardo81</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47273517</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47273517</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ricardo81 in "How Much Money Jeff Bezos Made Since You Started Reading This Page"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Using alternatives surely helps. I think so many people use Amazon because of familiarity and predictable delivery costs (free IIRC with Prime).<p>A lot of the time other web stores can offer the same value.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2026 11:07:14 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47273482</link><dc:creator>ricardo81</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47273482</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47273482</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ricardo81 in "BAFTAs Incident"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I live in his hometown, thankfully a large chunk of the population has been aware of his story since the late 80s. He's an extremely eloquent person and has worked tirelessly to raise awareness of the condition.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2026 12:10:57 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47194300</link><dc:creator>ricardo81</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47194300</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47194300</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ricardo81 in "Men in their 50s may be aging faster due to toxic 'forever chemicals'"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>seems likely. but without a scientific method to back their claims it just becomes a 'common sense' thing.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2026 14:38:31 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47166715</link><dc:creator>ricardo81</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47166715</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47166715</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ricardo81 in "Google API keys weren't secrets, but then Gemini changed the rules"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Fair enough. It's a reasonable expectation of someone that enabled Google maps 15 years ago that enables Gemini 6 months not to understand the fundamentals of how Google treats their keys. If it wasn't explained on the enabling Gemini screen, what do you expect the user to do.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2026 14:30:09 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47166605</link><dc:creator>ricardo81</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47166605</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47166605</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ricardo81 in "Men in their 50s may be aging faster due to toxic 'forever chemicals'"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I was thinking more localised. When legislation changes happened (here in the UK) the problem disappeared quickly. The UK being an industrialised country in the context of the parent comments.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2026 13:58:05 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47166166</link><dc:creator>ricardo81</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47166166</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47166166</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ricardo81 in "Men in their 50s may be aging faster due to toxic 'forever chemicals'"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Yes, some things would have just stood to reason in a general respect, even if there wasn't hard science to back it up.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2026 13:41:59 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47165973</link><dc:creator>ricardo81</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47165973</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47165973</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ricardo81 in "Men in their 50s may be aging faster due to toxic 'forever chemicals'"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>That long ago. Surely that helped identify it as a problem even though the science behind it would have been lacking.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2026 13:05:41 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47165525</link><dc:creator>ricardo81</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47165525</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47165525</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ricardo81 in "Men in their 50s may be aging faster due to toxic 'forever chemicals'"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>A necessary (?) part of progress IMO. Environmental hazards have been a thing for a lot longer too. Settlements used to be covered in smog due to coal fires for example.<p>Part of the environmental/emissions argument from developing countries is about past emissions by developed countries. I think it's a fair argument to say given these sacrifices made by past generations in industrialised countries + the benefit of developed cleaner technologies through that industrialisation is an argument against that.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2026 12:51:46 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47165386</link><dc:creator>ricardo81</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47165386</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47165386</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ricardo81 in "Google API keys weren't secrets, but then Gemini changed the rules"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I did. Specifically the part about "When you enable the Gemini API". This doesn't take into account that people may have had years old forgotten about other services they use.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2026 11:38:27 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47164685</link><dc:creator>ricardo81</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47164685</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47164685</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ricardo81 in "Google API keys weren't secrets, but then Gemini changed the rules"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I had the same thought. I guess a lot of those keys may belong to dormant/deleted accounts and only a % of people who have enabled Gemini (presumably it required user action)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2026 07:46:06 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47163127</link><dc:creator>ricardo81</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47163127</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47163127</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ricardo81 in "I verified my LinkedIn identity. Here's what I handed over"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>So basically 'Their “global network of data partners”' means once you submit that information, it's a free for all.<p>There's so many angles of grind with this kind of thing that big tech has gradually normalised.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2026 13:51:41 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47100853</link><dc:creator>ricardo81</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47100853</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47100853</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ricardo81 in "Who smeared Richard Feynman? (2014)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I understand where you're coming from. I wasn't meaning from the context of the pseudo-smart person portraying that (which is obviously a thing, probably more obvious nowadays), but a person that is the real article. You meet all walks of life in your lifetime and that unattainable-ness of very smart people can come across as inaccessible, unexplainable or arrogant.<p>The kind of person that has spent much time chiselling their belief system or is simply fascinated by a field of study that not many people can relate to on that depth. Feynman was a great communicator, but I can think of a few people that may have Asperger's syndrome that have that exceptional insight into things that sometimes results in collateral damage in relationships.<p>What I mean is there are exceptional people, and sometimes people fail to understand what is exceptional and take exception themselves.<p>The political narrative of the time obviously was extra cynical about declarations of which team you're playing for, or non-declaration. That's what I meant about non-conformist, they're not interested in the politics.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2026 16:14:31 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46976808</link><dc:creator>ricardo81</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46976808</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46976808</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ricardo81 in "Who smeared Richard Feynman? (2014)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The problem with extremely smart people is not many people understand them. They're typically going to be non-conformist in any event, and may come across as arrogant if they have an intricate belief system that you may not take the time to understand. I'd think one of the greatest scientists of a generation would have the kind of depth of thinking that few would understand. Having listened to many of his interviews (unfortunately I'm too young to have witnessed these things in real time) he comes across as one of the most eloquent people I can think of.<p>While reading through that I was suspecting it was perhaps a peer that was envious of Feynman, but an ex (scorned?) partner is extremely plausible.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2026 15:20:11 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46976029</link><dc:creator>ricardo81</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46976029</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46976029</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ricardo81 in "The time I didn't meet Jeffrey Epstein"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Isn't part of it that he had leverage on many people, given the amount of evidence there seems to be? I guess that would be one way to further the network via 'favours'.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2026 08:27:57 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46910421</link><dc:creator>ricardo81</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46910421</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46910421</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ricardo81 in "Show HN: Wikipedia as a doomscrollable social media feed"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Did you write your own summary parser for this? I wrote one in the past and found the wiki markup quirky to deal with. The wiki dumps do provide summaries but they seem to suffer similar issues.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2026 08:19:15 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46853686</link><dc:creator>ricardo81</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46853686</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46853686</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ricardo81 in "OpenClaw – Moltbot Renamed Again"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It was, on both counts but perhaps it's changed. Search for "domain tasting"</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2026 09:02:48 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46822126</link><dc:creator>ricardo81</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46822126</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46822126</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ricardo81 in "OpenClaw – Moltbot Renamed Again"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I think (not really sure) there's still a 5 day grace period when you buy domains, at least for gTLDs.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2026 07:54:38 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46821667</link><dc:creator>ricardo81</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46821667</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46821667</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ricardo81 in "European Alternatives"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I wouldn't hard recommend based on lack of solid experience of using them over time, but Gandi showed a lot of promise for me.<p>Context: I used to run a domain-related service that used registrar api's and gandi's seemed the most well thought out by a considerable way. The drawback was they're quite expensive for registrations/renewals unless you're doing it at volume.<p>I had reservations about them being a French company wrt support but their API was so good I never needed to contact them on anything.<p>Definitely worth a look.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2026 22:52:37 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46739092</link><dc:creator>ricardo81</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46739092</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46739092</guid></item></channel></rss>