(No child is deserving of being mistreated but that's a whole other bag of worms)

One should question the rate of which it is diagnosed, and who is getting diagnosed.

That's the real problem. People need to stay in their damn lane.

"Other studies already proved those effects with creatine with a normal dose schedule, what they were testing is if a single high dose would have a beneficial effect too, which it did. A normal schedule is 3-5g per day with an optional loading phase of 10-20g per day during 7 days.

In the study they used a single dose of 0.35g/kg which means 20-40g per dose. How do they not get diarrhea? The loading phase is usually split into several doses to avoid diarrhea and I can personally attest to that being a good idea."

What the above doesn't tell you is that taking a loading dose can draw water into your intestines causing diarrhea. You probably can guess how I found this out.

Since taking creatine I feel so much more energized. I can make it through the day with just 2 coffees (was previously drinking 5 coffees and an energy drink).

Maybe it's placebo. Maybe it's not. I don't really care. I feel the benefit and I love it.

I have sonnet do the thinking, deepseek does all the tasks. I've massively reduced costs with this approach.

Had me in stiches

It's drastically reduced my AI spend. I went from spending $40/day to $10/day.

It's not bad advice, just unlikely to land. Thrill seekers seek thrills.

I usually find I can achieve 90% of the outcome I'm trying to achieve. I use sonnet for planning, qwen for coding, sonnet for review.

There is so much I wouldn't know or understand if I didn't go down the odd rabit hole.

The worst thing they said was that it was "kinda disappointing". Which is perfectly valid. They really want to use inkscape but can't.

The man was reeling from what happened. He blames himself and his work. He sat and he wrote, naturally it came back to OpenAI. Should he of? Probably not. But it's understandable that he did.

We can meet the moment with some understanding and give the guy a little wiggle room.

Its dishonest to say it's incredibly common for people to want others murdered. That's not a belief that needs normalizing.

Some people want others to be murdered. And those people do not need representation.

It's a bad take especially considering the context. And to be explicit - the context is a molitov cocktail being thrown at a home a child is sleeping in.