CTM: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Concepts,_Techniques,_and_Mode...

I've never worked in HPC but it seems it should be relatively simple to find a C/C++ dev that can pick up OpenMP, or one that already knows it, compared to hiring people who know Chapel.

The "scaling down" factor (how easy or interesting it is to use tool X for small use) seems a disadvantage of HPC-only languages, which creates a barrier to entry and a reduction in available workforce.

(not that I think the US DoD wouldn't do that anyway, ToS or not.)

The doctor would also grab your testicles and ask to cough, to diagnose varicocele. I wonder how many young men have undiagnosed issues since the military exam was abolished.

In this case, I think not: there's paving stones under the dirt, if the building had sunk those would have to be comparatively higher up (they don't weigh as much) but they still lay at the front of the steps.

(or I should say, laid, sadly the building had to be levelled after an earthquake)

But also many post 2000 claims that it was all actually real food because of various "truth in advertising" regulations around the world.

The linked Canadian McDonald's video would be one example.

There definitely are instances of buildings being misaligned.

In my ancestral family home there was a door wat ground level, but originally it had a few steps to get to it; the outside ground had gone up by some 40cm with sediments over a century or so.

Once again Romans taking "inspiration" from the Greeks :)

Also https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shrub_(drink)

Guernica is one of the few that did. Perhaps because it's massive compared to other well known paintings.

So, I just want to say, I second your recommendation for seeing it in person.

Lie in every press conference? Sure.

Posting an image of himself as Jesus? The guy has dementia.

Except.. his ai lab is not popular. It has zero value and people only use it because it's on Twitter and they don't pay for it.

The fact that he had to merge it with a successful unrelated company tells you all you need to know.

Like, you can do a change that introduced a new API and one that updates all usages.

It's just easier to review those independently.

Or, you may have workflows where you have different versions of schemas and you always keep the old ones. Then you can do two commits (copy X to X+1; update X+1) where the change is obvious, rather than seeing a single diff which is just a huge new file.

I'm sure there's more cases. It's not super common but it is convenient.

It worked just fine 99% of the time and then 1% it became completely unusable.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posca

I think none of them are paying for it beyond techies, but this is definitely not because they hate AI.

It still required intelligence (changes across files may not be tracked as dependent but actually are) but it was a different experience from what git provides.