https://v5.filepond.com

In any case. In the screenshot the scrollbar is inside the textarea as it aligns with the resize control on its right. This is basically all the info needed to deduce the textarea overflow is the culprit.

But could be that the overflow-x is just a bandaid hiding the issue causing the overflow in the first place, like crazy styles on the placeholder.

And to my surprise it was.

This would’ve take a frontend dev 10 seconds to deduce and another 10 seconds to confirm.

You’re free to block them, but the websites cloning your content won’t. So either way they’ll get the content they’re after.

Worse, when/if the time comes that LLMs source their claims they’ll refer you to the websites that cloned your content.

- new climbers asks you for advise

- you can ask a new climber if they'd like some technique tips

- you finally top your project and someone commends you for it

- someone tops your project and you ask them for advise

- you're trying to top a boulder on a new set and are solving it with others

- you're _constantly_ in the gym so staff starts talking to you

I did however expect the stars to attract my ship, that combined with the top down gravity vector made it less intuitive.

It also makes it feel like a game happening in earths atmosphere instead of space, it impacts the possible sense of scale.

Still fun :)

It forwarded my request which was then answered by an open claw agent :/

Still waiting for a response two weeks later.

Looking at it again now, things like the electrical wires not being aligned, or going nowhere are always obvious tells. The outlines on the A in “laundromat” are okay but for some reason the vertical line on the R isn’t open.

It’s impressive that this can be generated with AI. I just wish it would come with a “generated with llm-name” label.

We need a way to flag AI generated articles.

I've written _a lot_ of open source MIT licensed code, and I'm on the fence about that being part of the training data. I've published it as much for other people to use for learning purposes as I did for fun.

I also build and sell closed source commercial JavaScript packages, and more than likely those have ended up in the training data as well. Obviously without consent. So this is why I feel strong about making this separation between code and media, from my perspective it all has the same problem.

I find this distinction between media and text/code so interesting. To me it sounds like they think "text and code" are free from the controversy surrounding AI-generated media.

But judging from how AI companies grabbed all the art, images, videos, and audio they could get their hands on to train their LLMs it's naive to think that they didn't do the same with text and code.

I’ve also received tickets where the code snippets contained API calls that I never added to the API. A real “am I crazy” situation where I started to doubt I added it and had to double check.

On top of that you get “may I get a refund” emails but expanded to four paragraphs by our friend Chat. It’s getting kinda ridiculous.

Overall it’s been a huge additional time drain.

I think it may be time to update the “what’s included in support” section of my softwares license agreement.

Entering year three of a complete rewrite. It’s kind of ridiculous but as I’m still enjoying the process of trying to built/craft a performant and flexible file upload web component I just keep going.

V4 is live on https://filepond.com, plan to release v5 before the end of summer.