<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: rimunroe</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=rimunroe</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 05:23:15 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=rimunroe" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by rimunroe in "Study found that young adults have grown less hopeful and more angry about AI"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Don't the vast majority of young people entering the workforce have no capital gains to deal with at all? That tends to be more of a problem for people who are already well off. Are you talking about a narrower demographic or something?<p>The amounts you paid in capital gains are about 50% higher than I've ever paid. That was the second year I worked at a big tech company and suddenly had stock, which was about a decade into an my extremely lucrative career as a software developer. Most of my friends don't have to deal with capital gains at all because they're not part of the investor class. On average the rates of trading must be much lower for people in their 20s, no?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 17:03:55 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47706214</link><dc:creator>rimunroe</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47706214</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47706214</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by rimunroe in "Study found that young adults have grown less hopeful and more angry about AI"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> I see young people frustrated when their cars get broken into or when they get robbed and criminals are not held accountable.<p>How often are your peers experiencing these crimes? Assuming you're in the US based on your comments, crime rates are much lower now than when in the early 2010s when I was a young adult and quite hopeful despite thinking my job prospects were bleak and that I'd never be able to afford a home.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 16:54:15 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47706066</link><dc:creator>rimunroe</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47706066</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47706066</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by rimunroe in "Got kicked out of uni and had the cops called for a social media website I made"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> [...] I'm personally stronger than that.<p>Respectfully, I think all of your actions here contradict that claim. It's easy for a person to mistake having a temper with strength. It doesn't take strength to get pissed off and lash out at someone who is angry at you. That's something most people naturally want to do, and it's something which we work hard to teach kids to resist. It takes a lot of strength to try to put aside your immediate, gut reaction and attempt to deescalate. Your statements elsewhere in this comment section and in the blog post give the impression of a person who feels entitled and is angrily rejecting taking responsibility for the negative consequences of their actions.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 14:11:29 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47675685</link><dc:creator>rimunroe</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47675685</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47675685</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by rimunroe in "Britain today generating 90%+ of electricity from renewables"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Ah gotcha. That seems much more reasonable!</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2026 15:37:16 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47575670</link><dc:creator>rimunroe</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47575670</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47575670</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by rimunroe in "Claude Code runs Git reset –hard origin/main against project repo every 10 mins"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> How can people be so naive as to run something like Claude anywhere other than in a strictly locked down sandbox that has no access to anything but the single git repo they are working on (and certainly no creds to push code)?<p>> This is absolutely insane behavior that you would give Claude access to your GitHub creds. What happens when it sees a prompt injection attack somewhere and exfiltrates all of your creds or wipes out all of your repos?<p>I don’t understand why people are so chill about doing this. I have AI running on a dedicated machine which has absolutely no access to any of my own accounts/data. I want that stuff hardware isolated. The AI pushes up work to a self-hosted Gitea instance using a low-permission account. This setup is also nice because I can determine provenance of changes easily.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2026 02:53:07 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47569890</link><dc:creator>rimunroe</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47569890</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47569890</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by rimunroe in "Britain today generating 90%+ of electricity from renewables"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> A heat pump house uses perhaps 40-50kwh in deep winter.<p>Over what time period, and where? My geothermal system draws about 1200 watts when heating our large house on the coldest days of the year</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2026 00:39:59 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47559400</link><dc:creator>rimunroe</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47559400</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47559400</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by rimunroe in "Meta and YouTube found negligent in landmark social media addiction case"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>No idea. I was just chiming in to say that is indeed the case with YouTube for some people.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2026 07:03:44 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47552282</link><dc:creator>rimunroe</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47552282</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47552282</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by rimunroe in "Meta and YouTube found negligent in landmark social media addiction case"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>To elaborate, I think experts usually use these terms as follows: an addiction is something where you have a continuous and difficult to resist drive to keep doing/using something due to it being inherently rewarding. A dependence is something where if you stop regularly doing/using something you’ll experience some sort of withdrawal.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2026 23:10:14 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47537039</link><dc:creator>rimunroe</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47537039</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47537039</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by rimunroe in "Meta and YouTube found negligent in landmark social media addiction case"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I knew someone who had exactly that feeling about YouTube. It was a genuine struggle for them to stop even though the amount of time they spent on it was negatively impacting their life and the content was making them more anxious.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2026 23:02:03 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47536955</link><dc:creator>rimunroe</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47536955</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47536955</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by rimunroe in "Woman who never stopped updating her lost dog's chip reunites with him after 11y"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>You can inject these things pretty easily. They're about the size of a grain of rice, and pretty popular in some circles.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2026 01:35:56 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47525720</link><dc:creator>rimunroe</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47525720</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47525720</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by rimunroe in "Supreme Court Sides with Cox in Copyright Fight over Pirated Music"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>They waited on the line until I said I'd deleted it and then immediately reactivated my connection.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2026 01:31:24 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47525695</link><dc:creator>rimunroe</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47525695</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47525695</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by rimunroe in "Supreme Court Sides with Cox in Copyright Fight over Pirated Music"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Funnily enough the only time I ever got in trouble for torrenting anything was when Cox was my ISP circa 2009. I'd been torrenting some PSP game and my connection went down. When I called the helpline they explained what happened and said they'd restore access once I confirmed I'd deleted the downloaded file.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2026 17:13:43 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47520266</link><dc:creator>rimunroe</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47520266</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47520266</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by rimunroe in "The Los Angeles Aqueduct Is Wild"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Thanks! I forgot that article, but now I remember that I read or skimmed it when it made the rounds last year. It's actually where I first learned that the aqueducts were uncovered!</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2026 16:56:20 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47457327</link><dc:creator>rimunroe</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47457327</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47457327</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by rimunroe in "The Los Angeles Aqueduct Is Wild"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I was surprised to find out it was largely uncovered, though I guess it probably makes it much cheaper to construct. I usually think of aqueducts as pipes or tunnels, like Persian qanāts. I wonder how much water is lost due to evaporation.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2026 15:15:17 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47455802</link><dc:creator>rimunroe</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47455802</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47455802</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by rimunroe in "Silicon Valley's "Pronatalists" Killed WFH. The Strait of Hormuz Brought It Back"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> If wife and husband are home during her most fertile time window in a cycle, she will instinctively “find him” [...]<p>Have you known many couples who had trouble trying to conceive? There's a reason fertility monitoring strips, apps, etc. are such a huge market, and it's not because people are trying to <i>avoid</i> pregnancy.<p>> [...] for some magic moments that may not be particularly planned or even romantic, rather more characterized by a delightful and clumsy urgency.<p>I guarantee that if you interviewed couples who had been unsuccessfully trying to conceive for a long time a large number of them would strongly disagree with using "delightful" to describe the urgency of sex during the fertility window.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2026 16:14:48 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47414709</link><dc:creator>rimunroe</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47414709</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47414709</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by rimunroe in "Every layer of review makes you 10x slower"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I worked for five years at a shop where a few years in we started pair programming aggressively. One of our most experienced engineers was really into XP and agile work (in the “purer” meaning of the term). He often suggested pairing when thorny problems came up, and eventually it spread. It often took half or more of the available time for programming each day. That was by far the best working environment I’ve been in. The team was excellent and it seems like we all improved in our skills when we started doing it more. We cut down on how long it took to get in while managing to produce better code. It made planning features and adjusting to unforeseen snags in plans so much quicker. I can’t emphasize enough how much of an impact it made on me as a developer or how much I miss it.<p>The biggest downside to me was that it forces a level of engagement exceeding the most heads down solo work I’ve done. I’d come home and feel mentally exhausted in a way I didn’t usually.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2026 13:30:57 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47412402</link><dc:creator>rimunroe</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47412402</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47412402</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by rimunroe in "Grief and the AI split"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> I'd say this is the crux of the matter.<p>That's why my opening paragraph and final paragraphs were devoted to it :)<p>I feel like a lot of the things I hear from other folks is that I'm missing the possibility of programming the way I used to, rather than being sad that it might no longer be practical within the constraints of my life. Even if I did start doing it on the side, going from eight hours a day programming to squeezing in one or two would be quite the change.<p>> You could perhaps even start your own company if it's that important to you.<p>I have no interest in ever starting or running a company. Every person I've known who does it has it consume their life. I'd rather spend time with my family and do stuff which doesn't involve a boatload of stress and additional responsibility. Not to mention that in the case where I'm no longer able to find a job programming the way I used to then I don't think it's likely a company where people did that would be competitive enough to survive, at least not normally. Also, one of the reasons I rarely program on the side is that I don't often have ideas for things to make. I just don't feel the need for much software in my personal life, and certainly don't think of the sorts of things where there's a market for them.<p>Having a lucrative job where you do something where you find great satisfaction in your daily work isn't the norm and is the privilege of a lucky few, but that doesn't mean they aren't justified in feeling sad at the prospect of it going away.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2026 14:08:03 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47364675</link><dc:creator>rimunroe</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47364675</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47364675</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by rimunroe in "Grief and the AI split"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Exactly. I said this elsewhere in here, but I’ve felt extremely lucky that for the last 13 years I’ve gotten paid to do something that would otherwise have to be a hobby. The problem is that I have other hobbies already and am a parent with limited time to devote to such things in the first place. It’s valid to miss things you were extremely lucky to have in the first place.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2026 02:45:09 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47360112</link><dc:creator>rimunroe</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47360112</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47360112</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by rimunroe in "Grief and the AI split"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> Craft lovers can still lovingly craft away, even if they have to do it on their own time instead of on their now-AI-dominated day job, just like in ye olde days. Nothing's stopping them.<p>…except time, which sadly is limited. I’m sad about the real potential that I might not get to be paid to do something I enjoy so much anymore. I care about end products for sure, but that’s not why I’m in this career.<p>I do this because a large part of the work engages me in a pleasant way. I like TDDing in a tight loop. I like how it forces me to think one step at a time, how I get to stop myself from jumping ahead, and how I get to verify my thoughts or theories within seconds. I find efficiently manipulating text in my editor satisfying. I love the feeling of being validated that my architectural choice was right when a spec changes and the required code change is obvious, minimal, and clearly expressed. I enjoy the feeling of obtaining mastery for mastery’s sake rather than because it lets me create a product.<p>I’ve felt incredibly lucky for over a decade that my work gave me the opportunity to chase that. I may find enjoyment in wrangling AI, but I’m skeptical it’ll scratch that itch. If it doesn’t and I wanted to still scratch it, I’d have to do it on my own time. That would mean sacrificing time I’ve previously spent on other interests, and I don’t have a ton of time to begin with.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2026 02:37:37 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47360062</link><dc:creator>rimunroe</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47360062</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47360062</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by rimunroe in "Temporal: The 9-year journey to fix time in JavaScript"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> For example `JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(Temporal.PlainYearMonth.from({year:2026,month:1}))).subtract({ years: 1})` won't work, because it misses the prototype and is no longer an instance of Temporal.PlainYearMonth.<p>I don't know if I'm missing something, but that's exactly how I'd expect it to compose. Does the following do what you wanted your snippet to do?<p><pre><code>  Temporal.PlainYearMonth.from(JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(Temporal.PlainYearMonth.from({year:2026,month:1}))))
</code></pre>
JSON.stringify and JSON.parse should not be viewed as strict inverses of each other. `JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(x)) = x` is only true for a for a small category of values. That category is even smaller if parsing is happening in a different place than stringification because JSON doesn't specify runtime characteristics. This can lead to things like JSON parsing incorrect in JS because they're too large for JS to represent as a number.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2026 18:14:04 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47339126</link><dc:creator>rimunroe</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47339126</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47339126</guid></item></channel></rss>