<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: robwwilliams</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=robwwilliams</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 05:43:45 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=robwwilliams" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by robwwilliams in "What is it like to be a bat? (1974) [pdf]"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Completely agree. This is what Hofstadter means by a strange loop. Our current LLMs have no attentional autonomy by design. The recursion is superficial and without its own Now. Adding attentional autonomy is The frightening alignment issue.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 04:29:35 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48486219</link><dc:creator>robwwilliams</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48486219</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48486219</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by robwwilliams in "What is it like to be a bat? (1974) [pdf]"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>You nailed it. Asking the question is asking to define from the outside what is an inner recursive process. The question is a simple confusion of domains. This is Humbert Maturana’s main point in Autopoiesis and Cognition (1980, now reissued). Recommend the whole book, as does Terry Winograd. The most intense part is the appendix specifically about the nervous system. Nagel and others knew no neuroscience and are clueless about recursion.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 04:04:55 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48486072</link><dc:creator>robwwilliams</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48486072</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48486072</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by robwwilliams in "How LLMs work"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Great, and won’t we all be just as surprised when human self-attentional control turns out to be just as simple or just as complex! Our minds as a strange fabric built of threads of recursions without the benefit of any explicit clock.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2026 14:32:47 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48425508</link><dc:creator>robwwilliams</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48425508</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48425508</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by robwwilliams in "Nabokov's pale fire: the lost 'father of all hypertext demos'? (2011)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Diderot’s Jacque, The Fatalist is a great example. Perhaps even moreso of endless recursion to the end.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2026 14:48:39 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48384880</link><dc:creator>robwwilliams</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48384880</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48384880</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by robwwilliams in "Erin Brockovich made a map to track data centers around the country"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Living downwind of Colossus I and Colossus II in Memphis has orders of magnitude more weight than even a convention large data center. On par with a large cargo airport like MEM (FedEx hub).</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2026 03:36:11 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48289288</link><dc:creator>robwwilliams</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48289288</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48289288</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by robwwilliams in "Anthropic is expanding to Colossus2. Will use GB200"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>What was the specific mathematical or factual error? It is not theoretical for me.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2026 04:44:28 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48217966</link><dc:creator>robwwilliams</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48217966</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48217966</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by robwwilliams in "Anthropic is expanding to Colossus2. Will use GB200"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The newer location is about 3 miles southwest of the Memphis Airport (MEM), one of the world’s largest  cargo airports and the center of FedEx operations (500 take-off and landings per day most concentrated in a 6 h FedEx window with lots of engines running on ramps and that produces about 2000 tons of NOx per year).<p>I live about 18 miles downwind of the new  Colossus sites, the airport, and lots of truck logistics sites, and a large refinery.<p>I definitely will be getting 2x exposure to ozone and particulates  from both Colossi when they are running full bore. Plus an extra dose of ultrafine particulate with my morning fresh air.<p>Yes, wouldn’t it be nice to be in Nashville instead with HCA, Oracle, many insurance and financial institutions, and the joy of country music.<p>As an avid Opus user I am in an ethical Nimby bind. We do need almost any investments we can get in Shelby County TN. I’ll take Anthropic in preference to Grok NOx. And it will be my NOx.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2026 02:21:17 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48217030</link><dc:creator>robwwilliams</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48217030</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48217030</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by robwwilliams in "Gemini 3.5 Flash"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Not in my fields of science: Genetics and neuroscience. The combination of Opus 4.7 Adaptive used with well structure project folders is amazingly useful.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2026 23:03:02 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48200840</link><dc:creator>robwwilliams</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48200840</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48200840</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by robwwilliams in "It is time to give up the dualism introduced by the debate on consciousness"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Completely on the mark! Algorithms can differ qualitatively. Recursion.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 05:40:20 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48175928</link><dc:creator>robwwilliams</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48175928</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48175928</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by robwwilliams in "It is time to give up the dualism introduced by the debate on consciousness"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It would have to explain how we construct “Now” from atemporal cells that are without a clock.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 05:35:50 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48175906</link><dc:creator>robwwilliams</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48175906</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48175906</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by robwwilliams in "It is time to give up the dualism introduced by the debate on consciousness"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Mainly because of recursive processes that modulate attentional focus, but of a special sort that we are just beginning to understand.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 05:32:36 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48175890</link><dc:creator>robwwilliams</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48175890</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48175890</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by robwwilliams in "It is time to give up the dualism introduced by the debate on consciousness"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Good first step of demolishing (yet again) the phlogiston of the brain. Even Chalmers does not argue for the hard problem with any vigor today.<p>Rovelli’s arguments were made a dozen times over by Dan Dennett, and made better.<p>His critique of qualia is unsatisfying because it never reaches Einstein’s problem: what the heck is the physicist’s meaning and mechanism of this thing we call “Now”? Rovelli owes us that answer. He spent a decade telling us absolute time is not fundamental, no universal present, no master clock. Take the clock out of the universe and the Now gets harder, not easier: if there is no clock out there, what builds the one the organism plainly runs on? Answer that, then explain consciousness and qualia to the neurophilosophers.<p>Now is probably a process built by asynchronous wetware to survive. Humberto Maturana said the mechanisms that construct it are atemporal. And yet here we all are, reaching for clocks and synchrony to explain the Now. The irony should not be lost on Rovelli.<p>The neuroscience is in print already: Bickle et al., Eur J Neurosci 2025 (doi:10.1111/ejn.70074. interview with R. Williams) where the wall clock is named as neuroscience’s most tacit and least examined assumption.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 05:27:57 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48175863</link><dc:creator>robwwilliams</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48175863</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48175863</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by robwwilliams in "The AI Zombification of Universities"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>What made University of California Santa Cruz so attractive to undergraduates in the 70s was no grading of performance and engagement but instead written evaluations. I loved being able to concentrate on great subjects with the help of often excellent teachers and TAs. Swathmore is noted for this culture too.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 01:11:34 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48143303</link><dc:creator>robwwilliams</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48143303</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48143303</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by robwwilliams in "Heritability of human life span is ~50% when heritability is redefined"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>No. Then the fraction of population variance attributable to genetic differences would tend to increase and heritably would also increase.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 14:51:32 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48136269</link><dc:creator>robwwilliams</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48136269</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48136269</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by robwwilliams in "Heritability of human life span is ~50% when heritability is redefined"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Agreed, the Dynomight article is on-the-mark. I work in this field and was really puzzled when I read this paper. Yes, it is obvious that excluding extrinsic causes of death will increase heritability estimates. But is death from influenza genetic or extrinsic?<p>The typo on the first page of the Science article is on the authors, not the editors.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 14:32:44 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48135999</link><dc:creator>robwwilliams</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48135999</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48135999</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by robwwilliams in "Heritability of human life span is ~50% when heritability is redefined"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>We have many bits and pieces of causal structure for some human traits courtesy of GWAS and PheWAS but you are right that lifespan genetics of humans is seriously compromised by rapid changes in life styles and environments.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 14:25:38 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48135896</link><dc:creator>robwwilliams</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48135896</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48135896</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by robwwilliams in "Foucault's Order of Things Explained with Trading Cards [video]"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>You are making a point that shares much with Foucault’s work: trying to understand why and how fields like psychology and sociology came to be crystallized into academic pigeonholes. Your frustration is what he studied.<p>If you want a deeper answer to your question read:<p>R. Rorty (1991) “Moral Identity and Private Autonomy: The Case of Foucault” (in Essays on Heidegger and Others)<p>Rorty makes the point that there are (at least) two ways to read Foucault: both interesting and also in tension.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 04:11:08 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48117712</link><dc:creator>robwwilliams</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48117712</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48117712</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by robwwilliams in "Higher usage limits for Claude and a compute deal with SpaceX"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Urban/industrial and refinery complex; not at all rural. Located about 8 miles southwest of downtown Memphis (3231 Paul Lowery Rd) on a bend of the river.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 22:45:18 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48042893</link><dc:creator>robwwilliams</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48042893</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48042893</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by robwwilliams in "ASML became the chokepoint for cutting-edge chips"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Zeiss and Schott are both owned in their entirety by a foundation that is not allowed to sell shares. Most of the dividends go to larger research institutions in southern Germany (about $80 million to Heidelberg, Stuttgart, Tübingen, Freiburg, Ulm, Mainz, Jena).</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 21:37:20 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47941177</link><dc:creator>robwwilliams</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47941177</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47941177</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by robwwilliams in "Why has there been so little progress on Alzheimer's disease?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Yes, and less than $1 billion/year spent on the basic biology of aging by NIH/NIA. Funding for research on the root causes of aging is decimal dust compared to distal consequences such as cancers, cardiopulmonary diseases, renal failure, immune diseases, Alzheimer’s, etc.<p>NIH is great at tactical research but terrible at strategic research, and politicians do not help much ;-)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 14:34:13 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47910693</link><dc:creator>robwwilliams</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47910693</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47910693</guid></item></channel></rss>