Secondly, motivated state actors have no dearth of money. It's not like the Chinese are saying "oh it would cost a bit too much to infiltrate all US financial systems, we'd have done it if it cost less."

If it can be done, it would've already been done. No party that matters is materially "unblocked" by the advent of LLMs.

Troubles for Anthropic would almost certainly affect OpenAI, significantly. Yesterday just proved that the government sees it within their remit to shut down AI models. All current and future AI investment now has to contend with this risk. You should even see the effect of this decision on SPCX on market open despite X.ai being whatever tiny fraction that it is.

Besides, when has the US government been known to do things like this proactively? The phone call came from inside the house.

The public in general doesn't have a good understanding of basic genetics and I blame high school science curriculums for not covering it well enough. Too much time is wasted on Mendelian genetics without covering the Central Dogma.

You basically cannot "edit" your somatic DNA in a meaningful wholesale way since every single cell in your body has a copy of the DNA, and it's a foolish endeavor. What you can conceivably edit to good effect is your germline DNA, stem cell DNA, or modify mRNA expression (e.g. retinoids; yes putting retinol/adapalene cream on your face is "gene therapy"), or introduce foreign mRNA for your translation machinery to co-opt (e.g. mRNA vaccines).

Again, I don't consider de-colonization movements to be separatism. A rough criteria would be that you must be physically contiguous to the state that you're trying to separate from.

Also heed my second criteria: a people who perceive themselves to be inferior to the majority group will never, ever develop ambitions of separatism. It usually goes like: "we're better than these other guys but they keep us under their thumbs, hence we want our own country."

There is no equivalent of unit manufacturing in software since it's just copying around bits.

"Craftsmanship", then, in the context of software just means how much you give a shit about designing something good. That's not going anywhere unless we get to a point where even the quality of the software that we use ceases to matter, and there is nothing to indicate we're moving in that direction.

1) we're a genealogically different ethnic group from the rest of the country

2) we're better than the major ethnic group of the rest of the country

Both bits are absolutely essential. I can't recall a single instance of a separatist movement based on purely political differences gaining serious ground, Alberta included.

Just on this note, you don't make vitamin D if you're indoors even if there's direct sun hitting your skin, because commercial glass filters out UVB.

I don't think that's true at all. A lot of problems are purely technical. Once someone figures out the technical part, you realize the politically savvy people waiting on the sidelines for a solution were always a dime a dozen.

Also, Meta interviews are generally not regarded as too difficult, which further fuels the imposter syndrome (everyone has a sense that they're overpaid considering how easy it is to get in). I almost suspect this is a deliberate strategy.

On a tangent, roughly nobody needs this skill. I don't know why some people think "LLM integration" is some kind of deep career specialization that's in high demand. Any ordinary generalist SWE can integrate LLMs into an application. It's literally just calling an API and doing some string concat.

When people say "AI skills" are in huge demand in the SWE world, it refers to being able to leverage LLMs to improve the speed of your regular software development, not literal AI integration. Don't brand yourself as an "AI engineer" unless you're targeting clueless seed-round founders or are a literal MLE; the bulk of the jobs aren't here.

It's more complicated than this. Historically, Chinese manufacturing has been notorious for quietly undermining the quality of the product to improve their margins over time, in a way that the commissioning brand doesn't notice. If a Chinese manufacturer quotes you a price too good to be true, they're probably quoting you at-cost and will build in their margin later, once the orders start flowing in.

Also, many European devs simply move to the US. Immigration is the primary means by which the arbitrage disappears.