<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: rozumbrada</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=rozumbrada</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 15:29:39 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=rozumbrada" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by rozumbrada in "Ask HN: How to be SOC2 Type 2 compliant as a solo-entreprenuer?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Not possible in case your clients are not stupid. Any company with SOC2 and <5 people is a red flag.<p>You might find auditors that would go along but any reasonable client will check your SOC2 report and quality of your auditors.<p>SOC2 requires tons of paperwork and management and separation of duties with also mandatory roles in your company - never feasible in a one man show.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 07:53:35 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48145762</link><dc:creator>rozumbrada</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48145762</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48145762</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by rozumbrada in "GPT-5.3-Codex"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I read this exact comment with I would say completely the same words several times in X and I would bet my money it's LLM generated by someone who has not even tried both the tools. This AI slop even in the site like this without direct monetisation implications from fake engagement is making me sick...</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2026 21:43:15 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46905793</link><dc:creator>rozumbrada</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46905793</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46905793</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by rozumbrada in "[dead]"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Finally... We had two days without large outage, I started to worry a little</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2025 16:02:08 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46005713</link><dc:creator>rozumbrada</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46005713</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46005713</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[StratoCyberLab – open-source and local-only hacking lab]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://github.com/stratosphereips/stratocyberlab">https://github.com/stratosphereips/stratocyberlab</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45422929">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45422929</a></p>
<p>Points: 2</p>
<p># Comments: 0</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2025 07:38:47 +0000</pubDate><link>https://github.com/stratosphereips/stratocyberlab</link><dc:creator>rozumbrada</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45422929</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45422929</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by rozumbrada in "Hosting a website on a disposable vape"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This is why I go to hackernews every day <3</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2025 15:59:43 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45251290</link><dc:creator>rozumbrada</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45251290</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45251290</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by rozumbrada in "Next.js is infuriating"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>If you finally decided to support proper server-side middleware, why is there still a limitation for only one middleware function and not a chain of middleewares as every other sane server implementation offers?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2025 09:06:16 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45100658</link><dc:creator>rozumbrada</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45100658</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45100658</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by rozumbrada in "How much EU is in DNS4EU?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The last hop showed in the BGP route is AS60068 (cdn77) which is a Czech company with global physical network. It does not mean the data are going through GB, it's not that easy.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2025 08:49:48 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44255433</link><dc:creator>rozumbrada</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44255433</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44255433</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by rozumbrada in "War story: the hardest bug I ever debugged"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I have no doubts that V8 has a rich test suites - including tests for the absolute value function.<p>But then a production optimized build apparently contains different code? This sounds to me like a system flaw</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2025 13:43:05 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43493579</link><dc:creator>rozumbrada</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43493579</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43493579</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by rozumbrada in "0-click deanonymization attack targeting Signal, Discord, other platforms"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I believe in reality it's a bit more complicated<p>CDNs do not choose datacenters for users based on a geographic distance. The number one metric is latency but latency != physical distance. Second metric is optimizations of price of data transfer between peers and IXPs which results in very dynamic routing rules. Then consider also network/software hickups/maintanance and distribution of datacenters' load...</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 22 Jan 2025 10:03:11 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42791092</link><dc:creator>rozumbrada</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42791092</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42791092</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Amusing messages in DNS TXT records vol.2]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://twitter.com/lukasf0rst/status/1851315675014340806">https://twitter.com/lukasf0rst/status/1851315675014340806</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41988019">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41988019</a></p>
<p>Points: 3</p>
<p># Comments: 0</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 29 Oct 2024 18:48:51 +0000</pubDate><link>https://twitter.com/lukasf0rst/status/1851315675014340806</link><dc:creator>rozumbrada</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41988019</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41988019</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by rozumbrada in "Bizarre Stuff in DNS"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>For people without Twitter/X account, this is a summary as a single post <a href="https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1850658084491874555.html" rel="nofollow">https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1850658084491874555.html</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 28 Oct 2024 07:27:41 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41968525</link><dc:creator>rozumbrada</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41968525</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41968525</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by rozumbrada in "The Alarming Prevalence of Zone Transfers"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Wow I hear for the first time that some TLD registrar would explicitelly allow zone transfer of the whole zone... talking about the Swedish TLD mentioned in the article.<p>This really works<p>dig @zonedata.iis.se se axfr</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 21 Oct 2024 19:30:33 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41907579</link><dc:creator>rozumbrada</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41907579</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41907579</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Show HN: StratoCyberLab – Local cyber range to practice attacking and defending]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://github.com/stratosphereips/stratocyberlab">https://github.com/stratosphereips/stratocyberlab</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41710171">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41710171</a></p>
<p>Points: 3</p>
<p># Comments: 0</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2024 16:00:53 +0000</pubDate><link>https://github.com/stratosphereips/stratocyberlab</link><dc:creator>rozumbrada</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41710171</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41710171</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by rozumbrada in "Enumerating DNS zones using NSEC"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Could you apply here the Kerckhoffs's principle which says that security should not be based on secrecy? I know the original principle speaks about encryption but why should not it apply here aswell? Organisation should be secure by design and not by hoping nobody discovers all its assets. That being said maybe the mentioned Swedish approach to have the TLD zone public makes sense?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2024 13:55:53 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41670535</link><dc:creator>rozumbrada</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41670535</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41670535</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by rozumbrada in "Storing RSA Private Keys in DNS TXT Records?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Could the act of publishing private keys to achieve a plausible deniablity actually backfire? If nobody is able to prove that the organisation sent the email, then the organisation is also not able to prove it. It works both ways. So imagine the organisation needs to prove an authenticity of some email because of a legal dispute. By publishing the private keys, it prevented itself from doing that</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 24 Sep 2024 00:17:15 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41631890</link><dc:creator>rozumbrada</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41631890</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41631890</guid></item></channel></rss>