<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: rudyp_dev</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=rudyp_dev</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 May 2026 03:10:07 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=rudyp_dev" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by rudyp_dev in "The bottleneck was never the code"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I think what I'm trying to get at is that there's a lot of code out there that really just needs to work. It doesn't need to scale to millions of users, it doesn't need to be abstract-able and useful to use cases we don't even know about yet, just needs to get an idea off the ground. That code is not the product. In such a case writing the code very much is a bottleneck.<p>If you're writing OSS code or software projects expected to be used by others that may have constraints like that, then by all means the code that gets output matters itself. But even still I'd argue that the cost of writing code manually to get there is still a bottleneck.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 12:32:37 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48035473</link><dc:creator>rudyp_dev</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48035473</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48035473</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by rudyp_dev in "The bottleneck was never the code"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I think the argument here misses critical nuance; there is a difference between code used to implement a product and when code _is_ the product.<p>It goes without saying that agents have little to no product sense in any discipline. If you're building a game or an app or a business, your creative input still matters heavily! And the same is true for code; if the software is your product, then absolutely the context missed by skipping the writing process will degrade your output.<p>That doesn't mean that writing code wasn't a bottleneck even for creating well structured software projects. Being able to try multiple approaches (which would have previously been prohibitively expensive) can in many instances provide something a room of bickering humans never would have reached.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 12:12:31 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48035314</link><dc:creator>rudyp_dev</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48035314</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48035314</guid></item></channel></rss>