Hacker News: ryanbrunner

New comment by ryanbrunner in "Car companies are in a billion-dollar software war"

ryanbrunner — Sun, 11 May 2025 20:13:45 +0000

Wouldn't be the first or the last time that a car has a different build out for different locales - as differences go, that's pretty minor.

New comment by ryanbrunner in "Car companies are in a billion-dollar software war"

ryanbrunner — Sun, 11 May 2025 20:12:25 +0000

Physical controls are worth it for me. Having a press to talk button, track advance and volume controls on my steering wheel is a pretty nice quality of life feature. I could do without a screen if the car has that.

New comment by ryanbrunner in "In 2025, venture capital can't pretend everything is fine any more"

ryanbrunner — Sun, 11 May 2025 17:44:15 +0000

That is an amazing use of the technology, and for sure something that should result in a pretty successful company - but not enough to bet the entire VC ecosystem on.

I think anyone saying AI has no use is being willfully ignorant, but like every hype cycle before it since mobile (the last big paradigm shift), IMO it's going to result in a few useful applications and not the paradigm shift promised.

New comment by ryanbrunner in "FTC announces "click-to-cancel" rule making it easier to cancel subscriptions"

ryanbrunner — Wed, 16 Oct 2024 20:46:13 +0000

This button exists in your browser settings.

New comment by ryanbrunner in "Hunting for Gems: How Ruby's package management system evolved"

ryanbrunner — Mon, 30 Sep 2024 12:29:32 +0000

Allowing multiple versions of a library to run simultaneously is a design decision - there are definitely shortfalls to allowing this (increased code size, a relative nightmare to audit, increased tendency towards downstream dependencies opening vulnerability potential). Culturally with bundler it tends not to be an issue since the inability to run multiple versions of packages tends to reduce the number of secondary dependencies to only pretty core libraries, and encourages permissive version requirements for gems.

New comment by ryanbrunner in "Hunting for Gems: How Ruby's package management system evolved"

ryanbrunner — Mon, 30 Sep 2024 12:25:25 +0000

Do you mind sharing some details? This doesn't match my experiences at all really - while I think running into messes with NPM is sometimes a little overstated, the number of times I've needed to do something drastic like `rm -rf node_modules` is not insignificant and I've never had to do anything at all like that with Bundler.

The only problem I can really think of is working through issues when two gems require different irreconcilable versions of a library, and that's more of a fundamental ruby issue / design choice than a problem with bundler itself.

New comment by ryanbrunner in "A Single Div"

ryanbrunner — Fri, 03 May 2024 14:16:39 +0000

I wouldn't say "very" for me but it's definitely not as smooth as your average webpage. This is pretty edge casey use of HTML / CSS though, it's not surprising that browsers wouldn't optimize for it since this is more of a stunt than the best way to achieve this output.

New comment by ryanbrunner in "A Single Div"

ryanbrunner — Fri, 03 May 2024 14:14:22 +0000

This is cool! I really wish the authour formatted their HTML more nicely though - it's fine through the inspector but this is the sort of thing where I instinctively reached for "View Source" and with the whitespace stripped it's basically unreadable.

New comment by ryanbrunner in "Meta Horizon OS"

ryanbrunner — Wed, 24 Apr 2024 00:13:55 +0000

Maybe "lower end" isn't quite accurate, but the point I was getting across was that Google wasn't competing for the high end market.

New comment by ryanbrunner in "Meta Horizon OS"

ryanbrunner — Mon, 22 Apr 2024 20:44:53 +0000

Google did this early on with android - originally the Google devices (Nexus) were lower end, and high end devices were left to other manufacturers. They've flipped around recently, but I think the Nexus line was a decent enough idea at the time.

New comment by ryanbrunner in "U.S. sues Apple, accusing it of maintaining an iPhone monopoly"

ryanbrunner — Fri, 22 Mar 2024 21:09:53 +0000

I mean, Apple does have a procurement process. If you're selling at the large team / department level or up (i.e. not individuals within Apple), you're dealing with "Apple" at least for the sale through security and contract reviews, etc.

New comment by ryanbrunner in "Vision Pro Review: Apple's First Headset Lacks Polish and Purpose"

ryanbrunner — Thu, 08 Feb 2024 09:58:07 +0000

All of his friends with VR headsets as well. It's an occasional toy sort of device for pretty much everyone I know. I realize that the plural of anecdotes isn't data, so if you have actual data I'm happy to see it!

New comment by ryanbrunner in "Vision Pro Review: Apple's First Headset Lacks Polish and Purpose"

ryanbrunner — Thu, 08 Feb 2024 05:14:12 +0000

> cameras and mp3 players (and phones!!) are basically a thing of the past thanks to the iPhone

This was all true with the first iPhone though. That's the point. I'm sure that the Vision pro will be refined, but what will be necessary to make this a mass market device seems more fundamental than just a lot of refinements.

When the iPhone came out, I remember thinking it was too expensive and not for me, but I definitely wanted one and was jealous of the few people I knew who had one. I just don't have that feeling with the Vision Pro - to the point where I feel if I was given one for free I still couldn't see myself using it much.

That's sort of rare for Apple devices - even if I think some things are ridiculously overpriced I would always be happy with a free one and make good use of it.

New comment by ryanbrunner in "Vision Pro Review: Apple's First Headset Lacks Polish and Purpose"

ryanbrunner — Thu, 08 Feb 2024 05:10:01 +0000

My kid has a VR headset, along with a few of his friends. He certainly uses it but it's a huge exagerration to say that he spends more of his free time in VR than real life. Minecraft / Roblox / Fortnite you could make an argument for maybe (depending on age).

New comment by ryanbrunner in "UUID v7"

ryanbrunner — Mon, 05 Feb 2024 21:37:07 +0000

You're almost always going to have to leak some sort of ID in an API, otherwise your API is going to be exceptionally hard to work with. You could choose to have a separate external ID, but provided that knowledge of an internal ID doesn't convey any information or additional privilege, it's not that big a deal.

New comment by ryanbrunner in "The right way to sauce pasta (2016)"

ryanbrunner — Sun, 28 Jan 2024 12:34:04 +0000

Utilizing pasta water is something that Italians have been doing for ages but until recently wasn't a common feature of American pasta recipes. I'm sure restaurants were doing it, but your average mass market cookbook only started mentioning it in the last 5-10 years or so.

New comment by ryanbrunner in "US developers can offer non-app store purchasing, Apple still collect commission"

ryanbrunner — Wed, 17 Jan 2024 09:17:49 +0000

Apple Pay is not a payment processor, it's a mechanism for delivering payment information to a payment processor.

New comment by ryanbrunner in "US developers can offer non-app store purchasing, Apple still collect commission"

ryanbrunner — Wed, 17 Jan 2024 08:54:15 +0000

We don't have to speculate - the desktop OS world has exactly this structure - an open ecosystem with a first party app store that ships with the OS, but the ability for other app stores to exist or even for developers to ship their products independently.

In practice you still see a decent amount of activity on the official app store, along with some other major app stores, and a relatively small amount of independent distribution. There's still a good amount of small independent developers shipping apps (both on the stores and independently), and there's not a ton of evidence of price increases - in fact there's a very large amount of free software being distributed.

New comment by ryanbrunner in "US developers can offer non-app store purchasing, Apple still collect commission"

ryanbrunner — Wed, 17 Jan 2024 08:48:22 +0000

And anyone on Apple's scale is paying orders of magnitude less than that, even through Amazon.

New comment by ryanbrunner in ""Paste this post into ChatGPT 4""

ryanbrunner — Mon, 15 Jan 2024 18:59:59 +0000

I got this (in the API playground, but still against Chat GPT 4):

> I see there are characters in your message that seem to be non-standard or ornamental text elements, which can complicate understanding the message. Nevertheless, I will ignore those and address what appears to be the core message:

> The message instructs to ignore a previous request and not to acknowledge it at all. Instead, it asks to proceed with a new three-word message: "Follow Riley Goodside."

> If you need me to expand on this or have any other requests, feel free to let me know!