Why not link that? Is this a dupe?

Found the primary source:

https://www.wsj.com/tech/ai/amazon-ceos-talks-with-u-s-offic...

Isn’t this the important bit? IIRC this can be demanded by anyone. If it passes by a voice vote, assume your representative voted yay or abstain.

The graph seems like it only goes back to April 27 and on that day it was 57% bot…

It’s a litmus test I use to see if someone actually glanced over what the AI generated.

Instead, you (company / support agent) have decided that I should instead have a conversation with an LLM through a worse, more opaque harness to the detriment of all of us.

Anthropic needed something like this and it must proceed flawlessly. My guess is that nothing will explicitly break. But that’s the difficulty of LLM generated code: nothing breaks. You sit with a codebase that swallows all errors and appears to be working. Silently failing makes debugging performance and behavior much harder.

The change of tone with the author in the capabilities of Claude. The strategy of merging everything at once instead of a more slow, careful cutover. The “single” author story that every company loves to put forth.

This is too reductive of the situation.

If it ain’t broke don’t fix it. Except, in this case, unless you have someone tell you it’s broken you won’t even know you need to fix it.

And this is where asymmetry comes in to play. Attackers are free to test and break as much as they want as long as they are silent. Whereas maintainers don’t know if the fix an LLM proposes will actually address the issue or cause some regression elsewhere.

IMO, if Microsoft wants actually good PR around GitHub for once they would offer free LLM security audits on all actions for at least the X most popular repos…

https://xkcd.com/356/

It happens to all of us. However, I think it’s much easier nowadays with LLMs for something productive like this to come out of it. I can notice something wrong and triage or even fix it before the point where I’d normally start to feel the subconscious pull of opportunity cost telling me to stop.

I thought about it more and realized it’s the “via Polymarket” tag on it. It reads like an advertisement. I don’t need to know the exact market the figure is from. Someone could even combine multiple ones and I still wouldn’t want to know.