<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: s1ds</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=s1ds</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 22:51:57 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=s1ds" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by s1ds in "Secure Custom Fields by WordPress.org"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Have you read them? Both are in pending status and not registered. "Advanced Custom Fields" most recent update before a last minute extension to respond to final notice was for: "Merely Descriptive Refusal - Registration is refused because the applied-for mark merely describes the function of applicant’s goods
and/or services."<p>So far even USPTO attorneys think it's a generic mark not worthy of being registered: <a href="https://tsdr.uspto.gov/documentviewer?caseId=sn98321164&docId=NFIN20240719151315&linkId=2#docIndex=1&page=1" rel="nofollow">https://tsdr.uspto.gov/documentviewer?caseId=sn98321164&docI...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 14 Oct 2024 01:37:30 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41833394</link><dc:creator>s1ds</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41833394</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41833394</guid></item></channel></rss>