"Hello, world! Welcome to the classic programming greeting. It is the traditional test message used to introduce beginners to computer science and verify that a language's syntax is properly understood"

Which clearly shows that there will be an avalanche of issues when non-technical people discover the joys of non-deterministic results.

All the responsibility is still yours though.

Very seldomly does middle/upper management truly listens to engineers, unless there's buy-in from the CTO/VP to champion the ideas and complaints.

However I've discovered wonderful gems like this RAM video.

Indistinguishable From Magic: Manufacturing Modern Computer Chips

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NGFhc8R_uO4&t=2070s

It's quite old but I think there is no modern version of it.

I've tried posting to HN a few times but it hasn't gained traction for some reason, but I find it absolutely mind blowing.

I guess it's "good" to know that I'm not alone.

The amount of times I've searched for a ticket that I know it's there (because I either have it opened in a different tab, or because I just created it), but can't find, it's just way to many.

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47591367

Points: 48

# Comments: 5

Personally, I've used LLMs to debug hard-to-track code issues and AWS issues among other things.

Regardless of whether that was done via next-token prediction or not, it definitely looked like AGI, or at least very close to it.

Is it infallible? Not by a long shot. I always have to double-check everything, but at least it gave me solid starting points to figure out said issues.

It would've taken me probably weeks to find out without LLMd instead of the 1 or 2 hours it did.

In that context, I have a hard time thinking how would a "real" AGI system look like, that it's not the current one.

Not saying current LLMs are unequivocally AGI, but they are darn close for sure IMO.

I mean ideally a proper SOC2 would mean there are processes in place to reduce the likelihood of this happening, and then also processes to recover from if it did ended up happening.

But the end result could've been essentially the same.

I've been through SOC2 certifications in a few jobs and I'm not sure it makes you bullet proof, although maybe there's something I'm missing?

Spent hours watching the graph hoping to get triplets and some kind of confirmation that I just found ET.

Miss those days so much.

I presume zero.. but nonetheless seems like people will take it as valid anyway.

That can be dangerous I think.

https://x.com/i/status/2024212378402095389

---

On a different note, it's surprising that a company that size has to clarify something as important as ToS via X

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47065175

Points: 17

# Comments: 4

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47065164

Points: 2

# Comments: 0