That, and the desktop app and confusion between library and Apple Music streaming was annoying to manage. They need to unify that experience or split it completely.

AI is a hugely powerful tool, but I’m sick of having to treat a human’s AI-based verbatim reply as a real thing.

Anybody that does this is going to be calmly corrected as much as possible, and if the behavior doesn’t change then something will have to change.

Most shops will not have that kind of time and money, so the default will be "harder". Also, to be fair, most shops will not be led by individuals that understand why ensuring things get easier / faster is important in the short term, so that also complicates things a bit.

That said, I'm learning to let go as much as I can and trust these things when it's "safe" and seeing how that shakes out. The risk is something falls over and I don't know how to fix it (of course) but I know it's a risk and I'm trying to avoid it so it probably won't be as bad as I catastrophize.

Otherwise, I think this car has a lot of excellent new tech in a package that just won't get the motor(s) firing for most people - especially at a 650K price point.

It's a shame they couldn't figure out a way to make the shape look a bit more sporting. Who cares about practicality when you're driving a ferrari?

I think most understand that their jobs are going away because we will need fewer engineers to build the software their companies currently need.

Now - huge opportunity for new companies and markets, but not sure if they will be as profitable.

I’m not skeptical of Europe - but I’ve studied governments long enough to know that it’s hard to enforce these things at any sort of reasonable cost / level. You need to be defensive in your thinking, and the FUD here is completely reasonable.

Also you need both now. It’s not enough to just have humans, and that OpEx needs to come from somewhere.

I’m not happy about it - just the way it is.

Why are folks jumping to some conclusions that this is some illuminati threat to democracy? Why is the article so breathless?

Feels like an unspoken rule here. Everyone wants to own a chunk of nuclear weapons and it doesn’t matter whether it’s profitable. You just need the nukes to survive and have a seat at the table

Your trust in the law (EU law! Haha) to do the enforcing itself is nice, but history and lived experience tell me that these laws are going to be skirted if there’s money in it.

Or, more succinctly - they are likely following the law but have figured out a way to avoid it as written using consumer opt-in and dark patterns.

You call it FUD, but this is hacker news and with overwhelming incentives it is not unreasonable to ask for verification that data isn’t being exfiltrated.

This made my whole day. Thank you.

Whatever derivative structures and equity and options need to exist will be easily created.

I don’t think we need any additional motivation or incentives to cultivate this for AI. We need to keep some in the tank to handle the fallout.

As a more personal aside: the US would do well to put up some sensible barriers to outrageous financialization and reduce moral contagion risk. Otherwise all these folks trying to multiply their money end up leaving the bag with the folks that don’t have it in the first place - and then the folks with money end up, uh… well, it won’t end well.