<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: saltlyfe</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=saltlyfe</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 24 May 2026 07:27:52 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=saltlyfe" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by saltlyfe in "Five Kinds of Nondeterminism"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>In formal methods, a subfield of computer science, we'd typically use the definition of non-determinism that is widely used within our own field. For example, see: <a href="https://cstheory.stackexchange.com/questions/632/what-is-the-difference-between-non-determinism-and-randomness" rel="nofollow">https://cstheory.stackexchange.com/questions/632/what-is-the...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 22 Feb 2025 04:35:04 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43136146</link><dc:creator>saltlyfe</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43136146</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43136146</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by saltlyfe in "Five Kinds of Nondeterminism"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Your first example is not non-deterministic, it's probabilistic. Drawing a sample from a truly random distribution doesn't make the program non-deterministic.<p>Non-determinism comes from transitions which have no known distribution and might cause your program to take alternate execution paths without any predefined rule. That's clearly not true in your example.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2025 12:00:28 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43126549</link><dc:creator>saltlyfe</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43126549</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43126549</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by saltlyfe in "Obscura VPN – Privacy that's more than a promise"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Nice. I like the idea of splitting trust so that the clients IP + browsing data are not linked unless  the two servers collude. This feels very similar in spirit to VPN cascading though?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2025 04:53:16 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43111272</link><dc:creator>saltlyfe</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43111272</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43111272</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by saltlyfe in "[dead]"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This was flagged earlier but I'm not sure why.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 18 Feb 2025 23:50:26 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43096659</link><dc:creator>saltlyfe</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43096659</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43096659</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by saltlyfe in "Insurance companies aren't the main villain of the U.S. health system"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I'll break this down simply:<p>- the Affordable Care Act subsidizes American health insurance with tax payer funds by covering much of the cost of insurance<p>- Health insurance companies are required by law to spend 85% of that revenue on healthcare<p>- Health insurance companies, logically, acquire providers. Thus, the 85% of their spending on healthcare is just funneled into the other companies that they own<p>The system is currently the worst of both worlds. We have tax payer funds going straight to for-profit entities which have become vertically integrated throughout every aspect of the American healthcare system.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 16 Dec 2024 22:16:22 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42436076</link><dc:creator>saltlyfe</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42436076</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42436076</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by saltlyfe in "Discuss: US economy rigged for middle class"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I am all for eliminating mortgage interest rate deductions. It primarily benefits upper-middle class homeowners. They borrow money from a bank and somehow get a tax break for it? Yet, even a wealthy person that pays cash for their home doesn't enjoy that benefit?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 08 Dec 2024 04:44:30 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42355064</link><dc:creator>saltlyfe</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42355064</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42355064</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Discuss: US economy rigged for middle class]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://twitter.com/tqbf/status/1865213091555758319">https://twitter.com/tqbf/status/1865213091555758319</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42355012">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42355012</a></p>
<p>Points: 3</p>
<p># Comments: 2</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 08 Dec 2024 04:29:15 +0000</pubDate><link>https://twitter.com/tqbf/status/1865213091555758319</link><dc:creator>saltlyfe</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42355012</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42355012</guid></item></channel></rss>