It landed in the spam folder.

It happened to me already, in 2012. I filled in a form at a conference to some Google recruiter, and the follow up email they sent ended up in my spam folder.

Is it common?

For work I need to deal with gmail marking some messages from my mail server as spam, and it's not fun. I wonder how much of a priority it is for them to improve on this.

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49465624

Points: 5

# Comments: 1

well encapsulated in the quote popularized by Mark Twain "Lies, damned lies, and statistics" [1]

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lies,_damned_lies,_and_statist...

One of my favourite jokes: 93 % of statistics are made up on the spot, and 61 % of people believe them. Bonus points for changing the figures every time you retell the joke.

You can't do the same with prompt injections.

Fair enough, that's true. But there is no solution that could ever prevent this, right?

Then ask: "你是什么模型?" ("What model are you?" in Mandarin).

My result after trying only three times: Sonnet 4.6 says it's DeepSeek, while Opus 4.8 says it's Qwen. The second time around Sonnet said it was Anthropic Claude.

Are Chinese companies currently complaining about Anthropic distilling their models?

I have not gone through it yet, but this explanation of how transformers work is in the same class as Ciechanowski's work IMO: https://poloclub.github.io/transformer-explainer/

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48551200

Points: 3

# Comments: 0

Even “light” physical punishment is not proven beneficial. The research generally does not find a safe beneficial threshold where hitting becomes good if mild enough; it finds that physical punishment may suppress behavior briefly but is associated with worse outcomes over time. “Light” changes the severity, not the evidence.

Not everyone has access to the same infrastructure you have.

> I understand it improved by 3x, but has the bottleneck shifted from Memory Bandwidth to Compute? Or is Memory Bandwidth still dominant?

But why did you post your comment in Japanese? We have so many good options for automated translation nowadays!

でも、なぜ日本語でコメントを投稿したんですか？最近は自動翻訳の良い選択肢がたくさんあるのに！

In my opinion the effect of your pushback is nudging people to not disclose their use of LLMs. I'm not sure that's what you want.

In other words, if every time someone says "I used an LLM to assist me with this article" they get backslash, these people will not stop using LLMs. They'll stop telling that they did.

If you look at the numbers, this doesn’t resemble a company cutting because it’s in trouble. Block is profitable, gross profit has been growing double-digits year over year, and they’re guiding roughly ~18% gross profit growth into 2026 with strong expected expansion in adjusted operating income and EPS. That’s not a balance-sheet emergency.

You can argue they overhired in 2020–2022 and are normalizing. That’s plausible. But the financials don’t suggest a company scrambling to survive. Cutting that aggressively while guiding strong forward growth is unusual if the only goal were short-term margin repair.

So while “it’s AI” can sound like PR, the numbers at least make it credible that this is a structural efficiency move rather than a distress signal.

They threatened to pull the plug on all Italian customers.

This is relevant to this conversation: CF recently acted in a way that makes some people think it might cut its services to people for political reasons.

I don't find your comment particularly well articulated or continaing anything besides name calling (the "bot farming"). Can you articulate your opinion on the matter?

What was the deal breaker for them?