It's really not different. This is just backward compatible (e.g. for intellisense). Honestly better than a #define that I have to declare to get a build going in a lesser C compiler (worst case, looking at you Apple).

Yeah, uh, I totally agree with you and won't be reading the rest.

You're talking about the best businesses. Arguably the article is talking about the mean of the "startup" tranche of businesses.

Google isn't a SaaS. That's (is or is tangential to) the kind of businesses this article is referring to. And they make decent money, they just aren't a unicorn that didn't die.

I also wonder if I'll have a "oh, the battery life _is_ much worse" moment soon, but not yet!

I guess they've been "laying the groundwork" of a fork that claims to just want to rename things and do little else for over a month?

Tomorrow's software will need to be _perfect_, or else it won't differentiate from "Claude, build a basecamp-style project management tool for my team".

If I can still reply mid-to-late next week I'll let you know.

I don't think the other commenters mentioning how server-side vulnerabilities aren't as lucrative in the black market are making that connection.

Sure, you can search the video transcript... but all the YT video is doing is regurgitating the manual.

Sure, not for the same reason, but... got'em.

I've done several Tailwind projects and rarely did models from various providers need to reference Tailwind documentation.

If you know Apple's history, this should stand out to you.