<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: sashank_1509</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=sashank_1509</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 16:32:47 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=sashank_1509" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by sashank_1509 in "Ask HN: Any interesting niche hobbies?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>How long did it take you to complete this project. How did you maintain motivation?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 23:47:04 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47697629</link><dc:creator>sashank_1509</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47697629</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47697629</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by sashank_1509 in "Judge blocks Pentagon effort to 'punish' Anthropic with supply chain risk label"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Yes, anthropic wanted that power through a legal agreement. Not by spying on the pentagon , or training their AI model to lie to them etc, which seems more appropriate for supply chain risk. The government in this case can just cancel its legal agreement with Anthropic and move on, which was always its expected move. Trying to unilaterally destroy Anthropics business for a contractual disagreement is not fair and I’m glad the judicial is pushing back.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2026 01:40:05 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47538132</link><dc:creator>sashank_1509</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47538132</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47538132</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by sashank_1509 in "US SEC preparing to scrap quarterly reporting requirement"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Even so, VRT has gone up 2000% since it SPACC’ed. RKLB was also a SPAC. A SPAC is a just a way to satisfy regulations as a pre-revenue early stage company. Most early stage companies fail, and that’s fine.<p>If such a company succeeds and still retail investors, don’t get paid back, I would consider that fraudulent, but that’s not the case with SPAC’s. I would like to see SPAC deals be better to investors as opposed to banning them entirely.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2026 01:53:34 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47407636</link><dc:creator>sashank_1509</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47407636</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47407636</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by sashank_1509 in "US SEC preparing to scrap quarterly reporting requirement"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>That’s much harder. If it’s a big private company like OpenAI, you need a minimum 50k investment. For smaller companies, the number is much higher I assume.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2026 01:46:02 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47407599</link><dc:creator>sashank_1509</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47407599</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47407599</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by sashank_1509 in "US SEC preparing to scrap quarterly reporting requirement"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I think it’s still fine. I’ve invested a lot into some SPAC’s. I’m good on 1, break even on the other. And I’ll keep holding it, since these companies are still pre-revenue and I hope they 100X.<p>The overall idea of SPAC’s is not bad, even if Chamath only created them to exit his sh*t investments. There are very few other ways for retail investors to invest in potential 100-1000X companies (which are generally pre-revenue). Of course the flip side, is that most SPAC’s might close down and cause you to lose money. That is the decision for the investor to make, risky opportunities are fine! Sadly chamaths shitty tactics to close out his investments have tainted a completely fine idea.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2026 00:29:26 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47407021</link><dc:creator>sashank_1509</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47407021</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47407021</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by sashank_1509 in "AirPods Max 2"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I absolutely hate noise. And so I loved AirPods Max. It was, I think the best noise cancelling money could buy and I’ve tried several of the Sony and Bose Headphones. Then funnily enough my AirPods Pro 3 completely smokes my AirPods Max. There are times when I literally can’t notice someone calling out my name, when I wear my pro 3 with ambient sounds, this never happened even with over the ear noise cancelling phones in the past. I have no idea what magic Apple used to pull this off and so my usage of AirPods Max has fallen to nil.<p>Now I wonder if AirPods Max 2 is even better than AirPods Pro 3 but we are soon reaching the point of diminishing returns. So to all kindred souls who hate noise, Pro 3 is probably good enough for your use cases!</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2026 20:20:04 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47404331</link><dc:creator>sashank_1509</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47404331</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47404331</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by sashank_1509 in "Life as an OnlyFans 'chatter'"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>lol, a job that I would support to be 100% automated by OpenAI</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2026 21:41:16 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47381526</link><dc:creator>sashank_1509</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47381526</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47381526</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by sashank_1509 in "White House plan to break up iconic U.S. climate lab moves forward"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Crypto should be first on the chopping block. Then they should designate A16Z a national security risk just like they did with Anthropic.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2026 19:57:04 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47356220</link><dc:creator>sashank_1509</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47356220</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47356220</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by sashank_1509 in "Waymo blocking ambulance during deadly Austin shooting"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This is ridiculous. We don’t send surgeons to jail if they mistakenly kill their patient.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2026 23:37:10 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47212004</link><dc:creator>sashank_1509</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47212004</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47212004</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by sashank_1509 in "We Solved Execution. Now What?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I suppose the hope is that the coming AI boom will accelerate development in multiple different spheres (material science, transportation etc) and similar to the Industrial Revolution, humanity will ascend to a new normal, probably one where we are again constrained by execution , this time AI’s complete execution + Humanities execution.<p>That said, it’s very likely none of that happens and AI + Human execution just means more easy SAAS business and no SAAS business can have code as a moat since AI can replicate that quite easily. The second scenario seems more likely</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2026 00:46:28 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47145787</link><dc:creator>sashank_1509</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47145787</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47145787</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by sashank_1509 in "I want to wash my car. The car wash is 50 meters away. Should I walk or drive?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>lol, are AI companies patching this answer in real time. I thought it took months long effort for a training run. How would they make changes in such a short period?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2026 01:56:56 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47042773</link><dc:creator>sashank_1509</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47042773</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47042773</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by sashank_1509 in "The EU moves to kill infinite scrolling"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I’m mixed on this. I do at times waste a lot of time doom scrolling, and would like regulation to prevent me from doing so. But also some times you just want to doomscroll to escape your day to day life. Do we want this decision to be made by the govt?<p>I guess we don’t let people have hard drugs even if sometimes they just need to escape their painful life. And maybe this could fall under that logic. But we do let people drink themselves, which serves the same purpose. And if I had to choose, I think doomscrolling is more at the level of Drinking, and less at the level of Heroin. So I would actually be fine with an age limit for doomscrolling after which, you have a hands off approach.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2026 03:02:48 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47011106</link><dc:creator>sashank_1509</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47011106</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47011106</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by sashank_1509 in "Is particle physics dead, dying, or just hard?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>What would the cost of the “next machine” be? Is it going to be tens of billions or can we make progress with lesser money. If it is going to be tens of billions, then maybe we need to invest in engineering to reduce this cost, because it’s not sustainable to suspend thirty years, tens of billions for every incremental improvement.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2026 07:47:59 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46956577</link><dc:creator>sashank_1509</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46956577</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46956577</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by sashank_1509 in "English professors double down on requiring printed copies of readings"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>At some level, this is a problem of unmotivated students and college mostly being just for signaling as opposed to real education.<p>If the sole purpose of college is to rank students, and funnel them to high prestige jobs that have no use for what they actually learn in college then what the students are doing is rational.<p>If however the student is actually there to learn, he knows that using ChatGPT accomplishes nothing. In fact all this proves is that most students in most colleges are not there to learn. Which begs the question why are they even going to college? Maybe this institution is outdated. Surely there is a cheaper and more time efficient way to ranking students for companies.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2026 17:04:07 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46847537</link><dc:creator>sashank_1509</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46847537</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46847537</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by sashank_1509 in "Amazon cuts 16k jobs"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>We’ve had crazy covid years where every new grad was making 250k+, and now every 3-6 months we have layoffs which has not surprisingly been paired with blaming it on offshoring, H1b etc. Clearly the current system can’t withstand much of a shock, what’s going to happen if we get a full 2007 style recession, will the blame game go even higher on steroids, some times it feels like it’s quite bad already. I don’t look forward to that.<p>I think and I know HN commentators are going to hate this, but Thiel was right when he wrote that the current system only works with fast continuous growth. Ideally multiple growing sectors, contributing to the economy. Anything else, and everyone immediately starts fighting for scraps joining their tribal identity or whatnot. The only way out, would be more rapid growth in multiple sectors, not just AI, or a complete breakdown of the existing system which does not leave me hopeful for anything better. I in fact like the existing system quite a bit, but maybe that’s just me.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2026 18:28:19 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46799542</link><dc:creator>sashank_1509</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46799542</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46799542</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by sashank_1509 in "India and EU announce landmark trade deal"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I’m surprised, so it seems like most tariffs are falling towards zero on all products except agriculture and cars below 17,000$ in the coming few years.<p>Especially cars, India has had insane tariffs on luxury cars and motorcycles that will disappear, which is interesting. On the face this seems like a good deal for India as India can probably export much more than EU can to India except for a few sectors like Automobiles and Chips, but who knows, I assume EU officials seem to think the gains in a few high tech sectors are enough to offset the cheap goods on all other sectors.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2026 16:08:40 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46781866</link><dc:creator>sashank_1509</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46781866</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46781866</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by sashank_1509 in "I'm addicted to being useful"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I’ve never felt useful in any of the big tech companies I’ve worked at. It always feels pointless. Is it just the projects I’ve been assigned never being worth anything or whether it is my perspective on those projects, I have no idea</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2026 23:14:46 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46698979</link><dc:creator>sashank_1509</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46698979</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46698979</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by sashank_1509 in "I hate GitHub Actions with passion"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>lol, this post makes me feel like crying at my job in BigTech co. He’s complaining about a 30 min feedback loop maybe, mine is 2+ hours.<p>I write a piece of code, however small the change. Then run the proc, first it takes ~20 mins to compile. Then since it is ML, it can only run on a remote server. It takes an easy 20 more minutes to start running in the remote server. Then after another 40 minutes I can confirm the job failed. The only way to debug is to read through a massive log file, for which we have an in built log reader lol. The log file will have thousands of errors that literally don’t matter, and you’ll never have enough context to know which errors don’t matter. You can simply ping someone and ask, does this error matter, could this be the reason my entire proc failed, oh no this is just a useless log that fails all the time, I shouldn’t have been wasting a day digging into this, ok thanks bye.<p>But this isn’t it, not even close lol, we in fact have a custom DSL to define computational graphs, which of course does not have any linter, or even any compiler and a very broken visualizer but our entire org runs on this. Syntax errors, logic errors, actual race conditions are all caught the exact same way —- as the process dying after trying to run on a remote server for 2+ hours with no useful error log. So our workflow is to just get a cup of coffee and stare at the graph which can get thousands and thousands of lines big to find at times completely trivial bugs that any half decent language would have caught as a syntax error.<p>My exp in BigTechCo makes me completely understand GitHub actions, my guess is many big companies have equally janky tools that harm dev productivity but still somehow take absolutely massive workloads. GitHub just thought of sharing it to the public.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2026 02:06:25 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46627047</link><dc:creator>sashank_1509</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46627047</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46627047</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by sashank_1509 in "Scaling long-running autonomous coding"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Oh it doesn’t compile? that’s very revealing</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2026 00:00:29 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46625875</link><dc:creator>sashank_1509</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46625875</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46625875</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by sashank_1509 in "Scaling long-running autonomous coding"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Can a browser expert please go through the code the agent wrote (skim it), and let us know how it is. Is it comparable to ladybird, or Servo, can it ever reach that capability soon?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2026 22:39:22 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46624881</link><dc:creator>sashank_1509</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46624881</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46624881</guid></item></channel></rss>