<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: schmichael</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=schmichael</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 01:55:16 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=schmichael" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by schmichael in "A cryptography engineer's perspective on quantum computing timelines"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I apologize if I flippantly dismissed the fact that experts disagree. That was not my intention. I was trying to point out that OP does address the referenced counter-point post specifically.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 19:24:52 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47665675</link><dc:creator>schmichael</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47665675</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47665675</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by schmichael in "A cryptography engineer's perspective on quantum computing timelines"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>That's not a rebuttal. The post references the paper and a rebuttal to it from an expert in the field.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 17:35:11 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47664147</link><dc:creator>schmichael</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47664147</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47664147</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by schmichael in "What if Python was natively distributable?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Harsh but fair. :)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2026 20:25:13 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47445457</link><dc:creator>schmichael</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47445457</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47445457</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by schmichael in "What if Python was natively distributable?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Absolutely wild to see none of the long lineage of similar attempts mentioned here. The earliest I could find with a quick search was Pyro which started in <i>1998</i> and still seems to be going: <a href="https://pyro4.readthedocs.io/en/stable/" rel="nofollow">https://pyro4.readthedocs.io/en/stable/</a><p>RPyC came along in the aughts. There's a long history of "transparent clustering and rpc" efforts in Python that could be used or drawn on.<p>Sad to see that history ignored here.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2026 19:21:00 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47444510</link><dc:creator>schmichael</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47444510</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47444510</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by schmichael in "Show HN: Antfly: Distributed, Multimodal Search and Memory and Graphs in Go"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>HTTP/QUIC, so no gRPC then? Or is <a href="https://github.com/grpc/grpc/issues/19126" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/grpc/grpc/issues/19126</a> not the blocker to gRPC over QUIC I thought it was.<p>I've long wished for QUIC with Nomad! [1] We've always used a weird QUIC-over-TCP multiplexer called yamux. [2]<p>[1] <a href="https://github.com/hashicorp/nomad/issues/23848" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/hashicorp/nomad/issues/23848</a><p>[2] <a href="https://github.com/hashicorp/yamux" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/hashicorp/yamux</a> (I'm fairly certain libp2p's fork is actually better)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2026 22:02:38 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47418961</link><dc:creator>schmichael</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47418961</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47418961</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by schmichael in "Show HN: Antfly: Distributed, Multimodal Search and Memory and Graphs in Go"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>As a longtime Raft user (via hashicorp/raft), I'm curious about your Raft implementation! You mention etcd's Raft library, but it isn't natively Multi-Raft is it? Is your implementation similar to <a href="https://tikv.org/deep-dive/scalability/multi-raft/" rel="nofollow">https://tikv.org/deep-dive/scalability/multi-raft/</a> ? I'd love to hear about your experience implementing and testing it!</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2026 21:41:48 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47418717</link><dc:creator>schmichael</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47418717</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47418717</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by schmichael in "Tech employment now significantly worse than the 2008 or 2020 recessions"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Thank you! Could HN switch the links? bsky doesn't require a login to view replies. bsky is just a superior viewing experience.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2026 20:36:04 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47280748</link><dc:creator>schmichael</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47280748</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47280748</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by schmichael in "Where did all the starships go?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Is the number of books with “space” in the title a meaningful indicator of anything other than how many books have “space” in the title? Sure Murderbot may not be as big as Game of Thrones, but these statistics seem more about linguistic trends than genres.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2026 00:12:24 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46929812</link><dc:creator>schmichael</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46929812</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46929812</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by schmichael in "iPhone 16 Best-Selling Smartphone in 2025; Apple Takes 7 Spots in Top Models"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Not sure why you're being downvoted, that was my exact issue. I only had a 128 GB iPhone 12 though and System Data had eaten up over 60 GB. As I cleared off more apps and data it would just eat up the excess.<p>The internet seems full of various wild fixes, but I could afford an upgrade so saved myself the hassle of futzing.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2026 23:52:16 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46818644</link><dc:creator>schmichael</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46818644</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46818644</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by schmichael in "iPhone 16 Best-Selling Smartphone in 2025; Apple Takes 7 Spots in Top Models"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I honestly never noticed memory pressure. I am not a heavy app user. Chat, browsing, and pictures of my kids are the vast majority of my phone usage. Not exactly intensive stuff.<p>The camera button on the 16 seems to have been perfectly engineered to be exactly where I grab my phone. I'm sure I'll get used to it, but in the mean time I have so many blurry photos of desktops and pants to enjoy.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2026 23:49:04 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46818602</link><dc:creator>schmichael</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46818602</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46818602</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by schmichael in "iPhone 16 Best-Selling Smartphone in 2025; Apple Takes 7 Spots in Top Models"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I recently upgraded from an iPhone 12 to an iPhone 16 because I couldn't figure out how to free enough storage on the 12. The battery was still more than good enough to go a full day.<p>I don't notice any difference other than now I have a pile of useless lightning cables (good riddance). Honestly kind of a relief as I liked the 12 just fine. Phones kind of seem like a Solved tech these days. About as exciting to upgrade them as upgrading my Brother Laser Printer.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2026 21:52:25 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46817194</link><dc:creator>schmichael</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46817194</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46817194</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[HashiCorp Nomad Forked as OpenWonton]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://openwonton.org/">https://openwonton.org/</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46799045">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46799045</a></p>
<p>Points: 1</p>
<p># Comments: 0</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2026 17:57:21 +0000</pubDate><link>https://openwonton.org/</link><dc:creator>schmichael</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46799045</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46799045</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by schmichael in "GenAI, the snake eating its own tail"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>If you're paying to use the model that means instead of paying content creators you're also now giving more content to the model for free.<p>Also just like SEO to game search engines, "democratized RLHF" has big trust issues.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2026 19:04:24 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46709992</link><dc:creator>schmichael</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46709992</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46709992</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by schmichael in "Much of the World Facing 'Water Bankruptcy,' U.N. Report Warns"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> feeling entitled to continue living in a place<p>Are you suggesting people are not entitled to live on land they own and should be forced to relocate? Since you've made their land worthless, how are they paying for this new place to live?<p>I heard a water district manager for a southwestern US city once say: "it's easier to move water than people." What if we adapted your statement for what the law actually allows?<p>> A whole lot of it is water being in stupid places feeling entitled to continue being in a place without the people nearby to drink it.<p>This implies we should move water to where people need it which is both legal and reflects reality even if it sounds very silly. Physics is even on our side here: water is deposited as snow on mountains where there are few people. It flows downward under the force of gravity to where people actually live.  It's a pretty nice natural system to take advantage of!<p>The details here matter a lot: should we socialize the costs of moving water among people who do not directly need that water? Should people in Seattle pay for people in Yakima to get water? Irrigating dry unpopulated areas is a great way to produce food that is uneconomical to produce in or near cities!<p>Water management is a complex problem since it's needed for sustaining not just people, but the food people eat. There's no easy switch to flip here and just solve the thing.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2026 20:39:37 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46697459</link><dc:creator>schmichael</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46697459</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46697459</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by schmichael in "ThinkNext Design"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Absolutely nothing beats the integration of Apple software and hardware. As it should be because they don't give you another option! You can't run Apple software on anything else (without hacks), and you can't run anything else on Apple hardware (without significant effort and sacrifice in functionality). This is Apple's whole design philosophy and value prop, and they are essentially unbeatable at systems integration.<p>This deep software/hardware integration means Apple absolutely destroys everyone at battery life. No contest. If you want to optimize for battery life, Apple is the choice.<p>The deep integration also makes Apple's security quite good. Obnoxiously so as they make even common operations like downloading software off the web take extra steps.<p>That being said as soon as you stray outside of a pure Apple ecosystem, Linux wins in my experience. Plugging a Logitech mouse into my MacBook prompted me to install Logitech <i>keyboard</i> drivers... Not only was the device type wrong but drivers?! ...for a simple input device?! I haven't had to worry about printer, mouse, keyboard, webcam, usb mic, drawing pad, etc drivers in years. Simple devices almost universally Just Work in Linux without having to install or configure anything. It's mind boggling when I touch Windows or macOS and am greeted with <i>proprietary</i> drivers for something like a basic laser printer.<p>But there's plenty of counter-examples: Nvidia requires their proprietary driver to fully utilize their hardware, but the driver is much better than it used to be. My understanding is that no one on Windows really enjoys dealing with Nvidia drivers either, so it's probably a similar scenario.<p>At the end of the day I use both Linux and macOS regularly and prefer Linux overall. My Macbook Air's battery life and lack of fans does make it unbeatable for actual lap-top computing, and when I want to look and sound good on a Zoom call I can always count on its builtin camera and mic. So I basically use my Macbook as a laptop form factor iPhone or iPad, which I think is Apple's intent and fills a niche for sure.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2026 17:54:06 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46670188</link><dc:creator>schmichael</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46670188</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46670188</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by schmichael in "Our approach to advertising"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Sometimes when I see my parents or other non-tech people using their phones I'm just aghast at what they put up with. We truly never left the Bonzi Buddy era of the 90s. Simple candy crush clones with banner ads on the top and bottom + interstitial ads every few minutes. Maybe throw in some gambling...
...or visit any given US newspaper or local TV station site without an ad blocker. Fans will spin, scrolling will stutter, and what little content there is will barely be visible through the videos about how chugging olive oil like jesus will give you abs like judas.<p>The combination of technical prowess and relative wealth of the average HN commenter means I bet we see 1/100th the ads of the average consumer. It's wild out there.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2026 01:05:55 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46654299</link><dc:creator>schmichael</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46654299</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46654299</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by schmichael in "Our approach to advertising"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> $20/month product with ads<p>That's a Netflix + Hulu subscription - with ads in both. Before streaming people regularly paid $50/mo (not adjusted for inflation) for cable TV with ads.<p>While it's easy to bemoan Google pushing ads into every corner of our digital lives, I think they arguably offered an unprecedented level of services relative to the number of ads, and we all got used to that.<p>Now whether OpenAI could ever push enough ads to make a profit: I have no idea! It's very interesting to see this race actually start.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2026 00:24:04 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46654020</link><dc:creator>schmichael</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46654020</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46654020</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by schmichael in "Our approach to advertising"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Step 1: Google made an excellent search engine where the top result is often the right choice for many common queries.<p>Step 2: Sell the top result slot.<p>Step 3: Profit.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2026 21:26:08 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46652424</link><dc:creator>schmichael</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46652424</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46652424</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Google's growing water use in Oregon]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://www.opb.org/article/2026/01/15/as-googles-water-demands-grow-the-dalles-aims-to-pull-more-from-mount-hood-forest/">https://www.opb.org/article/2026/01/15/as-googles-water-demands-grow-the-dalles-aims-to-pull-more-from-mount-hood-forest/</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46634873">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46634873</a></p>
<p>Points: 5</p>
<p># Comments: 0</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2026 16:21:29 +0000</pubDate><link>https://www.opb.org/article/2026/01/15/as-googles-water-demands-grow-the-dalles-aims-to-pull-more-from-mount-hood-forest/</link><dc:creator>schmichael</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46634873</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46634873</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by schmichael in "Claude Cowork exfiltrates files"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> The problem is, once you “injection-proof” your agent, you’ve also made it “useful proof”.<p>I find people suggesting this over and over in the thread, and I remain unconvinced. I use LLMs and agents, albeit not as widely as many, and carefully manage their privileges. The most adversarial attack would only waste my time and tokens, not anything I couldn't undo.<p>I didn't realize I was in such a minority position on this honestly! I'm a bit aghast at the security properties people are readily accepting!<p>You can generate code, commit to git, run tools and tests, search the web, read from databases, write to dev databases and services, etc etc etc all with the greatest threat being DOS... and even that is limited by the resources you make available to the agent to perform it!</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2026 03:31:27 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46627672</link><dc:creator>schmichael</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46627672</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46627672</guid></item></channel></rss>