<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: scott_w</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=scott_w</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2026 05:56:25 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=scott_w" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by scott_w in "Apple approves driver that lets Nvidia eGPUs work with Arm Macs"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>There’s no such thing as “monopoly on Apple-produced processors” because that’s absurd. The monopoly for MacBook would be “consumer laptops” most likely. Apple does not have a monopoly in consumer laptops to the best of my knowledge.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2026 13:01:01 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47648978</link><dc:creator>scott_w</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47648978</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47648978</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by scott_w in "Apple approves driver that lets Nvidia eGPUs work with Arm Macs"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>There’s no such thing as “having a monopoly on iPhone” in law. You have to have a monopoly in a market, of which iPhone is part of the “smartphone” market. It is not a monopoly in the smartphone market, to the best of my knowledge.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2026 12:59:05 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47648966</link><dc:creator>scott_w</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47648966</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47648966</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by scott_w in "Subscription bombing and how to mitigate it"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Yeah… no it wouldn’t. I’ve watched users have their bank accounts emptied (by accident) because they kept refreshing. A measly £150 isn’t going to register until it’s too late anyway.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2026 14:54:52 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47615330</link><dc:creator>scott_w</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47615330</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47615330</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by scott_w in "Why the US Navy won't blast the Iranians and 'open' Strait of Hormuz"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I don’t see how they’ll have different results, just because the aim is different. You just… take cover. Then come back once the planes fly away and continue what you were doing.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2026 07:54:07 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47611312</link><dc:creator>scott_w</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47611312</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47611312</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by scott_w in "Why the US Navy won't blast the Iranians and 'open' Strait of Hormuz"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>They have and Ukraine haven’t surrendered (nor do they look like they will any time soon), so I don’t see how it wit k a in Iran.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2026 16:03:18 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47589412</link><dc:creator>scott_w</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47589412</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47589412</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by scott_w in "GitHub backs down, kills Copilot pull-request ads after backlash"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I haven’t seen it but the article makes it sound like, when you ask for it to make a change to your code, that’s the point it puts the ad in.<p>I think (but not 100% sure) that it also puts it directly into your codebase, without you knowing ahead of time, without your permission. If that’s correct then it’s truly heinous.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2026 06:46:23 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47583598</link><dc:creator>scott_w</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47583598</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47583598</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by scott_w in "Supreme Court Sides with Cox in Copyright Fight over Pirated Music"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Just to try and understand the decision, an analogy that’s coming to mind would be like saying a van manufacturer wouldn’t have liability if it’s used in a bank robbery. However if the manufacturer sold it with the intent for the buyer to use it for bank robbery (the manufacturer having the intent in this case, as well as the robber themselves), then they could become partially liable.<p>Have I got that right?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2026 16:32:08 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47519639</link><dc:creator>scott_w</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47519639</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47519639</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by scott_w in "Miscellanea: The War in Iran"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I never said they were <i>good</i> Total War players ;-)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2026 08:39:17 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47514810</link><dc:creator>scott_w</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47514810</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47514810</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by scott_w in "Miscellanea: The War in Iran"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Because knowing this would require him to read the article but reading and details are boring.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2026 07:29:25 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47514361</link><dc:creator>scott_w</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47514361</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47514361</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by scott_w in "Miscellanea: The War in Iran"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Honestly, the way this administration has behaved makes me think someone there is obsessed with playing Total War and thinks that’s how the real world works. It’s all about winning battles and painting the map red, white and blue (Greenland, Venezuela, now Iran) with no thought to what they want to achieve beyond that.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2026 06:52:54 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47514133</link><dc:creator>scott_w</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47514133</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47514133</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by scott_w in "Miscellanea: The War in Iran"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Then I’d suggest you read the article because he absolutely mentions it, twice in fact.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2026 06:48:32 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47514102</link><dc:creator>scott_w</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47514102</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47514102</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by scott_w in "Silicon Valley's "Pronatalists" Killed WFH. The Strait of Hormuz Brought It Back"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Correct, the term "pronatalists" is in scare-quotes, suggesting that their belief/concern is fake.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2026 13:35:38 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47412460</link><dc:creator>scott_w</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47412460</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47412460</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by scott_w in "Britain is ejecting hereditary nobles from Parliament after 700 years"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I totally agree, the upper chamber <i>can and should</i> make amendments to legislation. In this case, they made a generally good amendment to the Employment Rights Bill (allowing "at-will" dismissal up to the first 6 months rather than the initially proposed total ban).<p>However after that amendment was accepted, Conservative Peers (who hold a majority) initially voted against the bill again: <a href="https://bectu.org.uk/news/prospect-slams-house-of-lords-for-cynical-wrecking-tactics-on-employment-rights-bill" rel="nofollow">https://bectu.org.uk/news/prospect-slams-house-of-lords-for-...</a><p>It was eventually passed a week later when the Lords accepted the Commons amendments but that second block on 11th December shouldn't have happened.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2026 14:49:45 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47351386</link><dc:creator>scott_w</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47351386</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47351386</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by scott_w in "Britain is ejecting hereditary nobles from Parliament after 700 years"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> There is no "primacy" of the House in the US system.<p>I know, I'm saying this is not a good approach, for the reasons I gave above.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2026 10:37:09 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47348812</link><dc:creator>scott_w</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47348812</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47348812</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by scott_w in "Britain is ejecting hereditary nobles from Parliament after 700 years"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> Which manifesto commitments have been blocked in this parliament?<p>To be clear, I didn't say they "blocked," I said:<p>> though the Lords recently have been playing silly buggers around the Employment Rights Act<p>This was a manifesto commitment which, while it eventually went through, it was touch and go for a little bit. Reporting at the time:<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f412kJChC6g" rel="nofollow">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f412kJChC6g</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2026 10:31:41 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47348757</link><dc:creator>scott_w</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47348757</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47348757</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by scott_w in "Britain is ejecting hereditary nobles from Parliament after 700 years"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I think a good revising chamber is critical to good democracy, though the Lords recently have been playing silly buggers around the Employment Rights Act and ignoring the Salisbury Convention (which is that they shouldn’t block manifesto commitments).<p>I do think the USA goes too far, which has led to frustration among the public and contributed to Trump and the resulting behaviour. I’ve said before that I think the US House of Representatives should have a mechanism to override Senate speed bumps, though not without effort. The idea is to encourage the legislature to compromise but maintain the “primacy” of the House if the Senate is being obstinate. Something like the Parliament Act, is what I’d have in mind.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2026 23:30:05 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47343971</link><dc:creator>scott_w</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47343971</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47343971</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by scott_w in "Ask HN: How to be alone?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> I would blame depression, but I have a great psychiatrist who has me on antidepressants, anti-anxiety meds, and mood stabilizers.<p>Allow me to be blunt: you’re still suffering the symptoms of depression. I’m not a psychiatrist but you likely have what I’d think of as “situational depression” (as opposed to ingrained depression). Once you either fix the cause (loneliness) or adapt to it, the depression will lift.<p>I think it’s worth saying that you need to learn how to be comfortable in your own company. That’s the easy bit, the hard part is figuring out how. I don’t think there’s a trick you can do, you need to put in some work. Maybe take your dog walking to more remote places than just a dog park? I guess if you’re in America this might be more difficult but are there any green spaces within a few hours drive you can spend the weekend at?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2026 13:22:02 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47297124</link><dc:creator>scott_w</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47297124</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47297124</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by scott_w in "Workers who love 'synergizing paradigms' might be bad at their jobs"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I recall a lot of this comes from Java 5/6 where I think passing function pointers around was difficult, if not impossible. Back in those days, I had many a conversation with a friend who would ask "can Python do pattern/feature X?" to which I'd respond "it doesn't need to."</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2026 15:12:11 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47275863</link><dc:creator>scott_w</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47275863</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47275863</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by scott_w in "Nobody ever got fired for using a struct"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> If anything it's the other way round, if you're not talking about business domain modeling (where data structures first is a valid approach).<p>And even there, the data models usually come about to make specific business processes easier (or even possible). An Order Summary is structured a specific way to allow both the Fulfilment and Invoicing processes possible, which feed down into Payment and Collections processes (and related artefacts).</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2026 09:19:20 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47272780</link><dc:creator>scott_w</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47272780</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47272780</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by scott_w in "Making Video Games in 2025 (without an engine)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> (if my memory is correct, oddly the engine uses quads rather than triangles)<p>I'm also working off a near 30-year-old memory but I recall quads not being unusual around this time. I remember a preview of Tomb Raider 3 in Official Playstation Magazine making a big deal out of the updated engine using triangles instead of quads to draw things. This was around 1998, so a couple of years after Quake came out.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2026 13:34:07 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47217778</link><dc:creator>scott_w</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47217778</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47217778</guid></item></channel></rss>