<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: seizethecheese</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=seizethecheese</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 12:24:30 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=seizethecheese" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by seizethecheese in "AI's debt binge can't last, hidden borrowing reaches $1.65T"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The shorter useful life implies less risk though, since therefore the projections don’t have to play out for very long.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 00:31:27 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49163071</link><dc:creator>seizethecheese</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49163071</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49163071</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by seizethecheese in "AI's debt binge can't last, hidden borrowing reaches $1.65T"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I think the stock wipeout would itself trigger a recession.<p>If the hyperscalers needed to wipe out most of their income on interest expense they’d lose a large amount of their market capitalization. This could drop the stock market a huge amount, and a lot of spending is driven by the “wealth effect” of households feeling wealthy.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 00:28:53 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49163057</link><dc:creator>seizethecheese</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49163057</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49163057</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by seizethecheese in "AI's debt binge can't last, hidden borrowing reaches $1.65T"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It clearly will be a big problem when the lending stops, there’s just no evidence of it in the article.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 00:19:23 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49163008</link><dc:creator>seizethecheese</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49163008</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49163008</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by seizethecheese in "AI's debt binge can't last, hidden borrowing reaches $1.65T"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Sure, I’m just saying the article doesn’t have any evidence of the lending stopping.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 00:18:54 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49163005</link><dc:creator>seizethecheese</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49163005</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49163005</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by seizethecheese in "AI's debt binge can't last, hidden borrowing reaches $1.65T"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The article transparently documents that people are lending to them.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 00:18:31 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49163000</link><dc:creator>seizethecheese</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49163000</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49163000</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by seizethecheese in "AI's debt binge can't last, hidden borrowing reaches $1.65T"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> AI’s insatiable need for debt has so far been matched by investors’ appetite for it, but they may turn nauseous on the belly-busting volumes coming from tech giants.<p>Headline doesn't really match the facts in the article. The article seems to say "hyperscalers are borrowing an enormous amount and so far people are lending to them. Other people are worried that this will stop".</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 21:13:30 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49161515</link><dc:creator>seizethecheese</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49161515</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49161515</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by seizethecheese in "Firefighter arson a long-standing issue – expert"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I’m curious what other professions have analogous issues.<p>Police who seed crime? (Surely.)<p>Developers who insert bugs?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2026 04:58:12 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49131184</link><dc:creator>seizethecheese</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49131184</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49131184</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by seizethecheese in "Everyone is building LLM routers, we deprecated ours"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Their router classified prompts into difficulty buckets. This obviously won't work. Consider a senior developer routing work based only on the task description. Clearly you need to dig a bit deeper into the task.<p>Saying routers don't work is sort of like saying serverless doesn't work. It depends on when and how!<p>One routing implementation that recently launched here is interesting (<a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49099143">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49099143</a>). It routes based on the models' initial trajectories. This is like having multiple developers get started, seeing what they're doing, then pulling all but one off the project. It should work, but doesn't seem ideal!<p>I've gotten routing working well for typical chatbot prompts in <a href="http://pellmell.ai" rel="nofollow">http://pellmell.ai</a>. This is fine because prompts are easy to classify into category buckets (for example: legal, medical, general knowledge, code). And models definitely have strengths and weaknesses. You want Gemini to answer General Knowledge and you want Claude to answer coding.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2026 20:30:41 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49128203</link><dc:creator>seizethecheese</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49128203</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49128203</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by seizethecheese in "The bond market isn’t buying what Fed Chair Warsh is selling"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>You’re right about a lot of this but there’s no evidence of trade slowing down. US exports are actually accelerating <a href="https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/IEAXGS" rel="nofollow">https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/IEAXGS</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2026 05:37:17 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49119387</link><dc:creator>seizethecheese</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49119387</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49119387</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by seizethecheese in "Claude: Elevated errors across all models – Resolved"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Flirting with one 9 of reliability <a href="http://status.claude.com/" rel="nofollow">http://status.claude.com/</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2026 20:13:17 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49102415</link><dc:creator>seizethecheese</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49102415</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49102415</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by seizethecheese in "Launch HN: Tokenless (YC S26) – Automatic model switching to save money"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Ah I didn’t see the tabs in the benchmark chart. Performance is worse on the two coding benchmarks and cheaper which makes sense.<p>I did read the blog post and I’m not sure what you mean by your reply. I don’t think the blog post addresses my comment.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2026 18:56:10 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49101522</link><dc:creator>seizethecheese</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49101522</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49101522</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by seizethecheese in "Launch HN: Tokenless (YC S26) – Automatic model switching to save money"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Super interesting approach. It's probably novel. I can say this because I've been working on something similar (while building a code version of <a href="http://pellmell.ai" rel="nofollow">http://pellmell.ai</a>).<p>I'm skeptical though. In order to pick which model is on the right trajectory, you actually need <i>intelligence</i>. But real intelligence would make your system painfully slow and more expensive. I suspect you're using a classifier of some sort, but I also suspect what it's really measuring is confidence.<p>Most likely, this is a fantastic approach for the kind of problem where there's uncertainty but only one correct solution. But this is going to be really bad for cases where there are many potential solutions, some of which look good but are in fact bad. You only show one benchmark, and I'm wondering if it happens to be nicely shaped for this kind of router. Have you run it on DeepSWE?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2026 18:41:04 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49101339</link><dc:creator>seizethecheese</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49101339</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49101339</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by seizethecheese in "Vehicle Motion Cues"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I’m colorblind and the weird thing is that it’s somewhat unpredictable when I will not see things. It’s not so simple as “can’t read red on green”. Shading and lighting matter enormously. An orange frisbee is harder to find in grass then a red one.<p>The strange thing is that I somehow convinced myself that I <i>wasn’t</i> colorblind during my childhood, in spite of obvious evidence, because I often could figure out colors. Then during an eye exam at 19 years old I failed 11/12 vision tests.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2026 15:08:48 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49085098</link><dc:creator>seizethecheese</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49085098</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49085098</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by seizethecheese in "Claude Opus 5"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Claude Opus 4.8 was not able to stump open weight models and Opus 5 still can't (in this case Kimi K3 and GLM 5.2): <a href="https://pellmell.ai/s/35c98b86f9aa93e4ca713079d96b20f4" rel="nofollow">https://pellmell.ai/s/35c98b86f9aa93e4ca713079d96b20f4</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 21:39:22 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49041918</link><dc:creator>seizethecheese</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49041918</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49041918</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by seizethecheese in "Show HN: Echo – Fable-level results at 1/3 the cost using open-weight models"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Yep! There are a lot of models like this: <a href="https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/capabilities/coding?cost-per-task=index-vs-cost-per-task" rel="nofollow">https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/capabilities/coding?cos...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 23:09:12 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49029288</link><dc:creator>seizethecheese</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49029288</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49029288</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by seizethecheese in "Show HN: Echo – Fable-level results at 1/3 the cost using open-weight models"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Yep! I found this interesting article after banging my head against a wall for a long time: <a href="https://epoch.ai/gradient-updates/gpqa-diamond-whats-left" rel="nofollow">https://epoch.ai/gradient-updates/gpqa-diamond-whats-left</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 22:53:25 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49029159</link><dc:creator>seizethecheese</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49029159</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49029159</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by seizethecheese in "Show HN: Echo – Fable-level results at 1/3 the cost using open-weight models"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Isn't the relevant benchmark RouterBench? <a href="https://arxiv.org/html/2403.12031v2#S7" rel="nofollow">https://arxiv.org/html/2403.12031v2#S7</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 22:40:38 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49029028</link><dc:creator>seizethecheese</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49029028</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49029028</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by seizethecheese in "Show HN: Echo – Fable-level results at 1/3 the cost using open-weight models"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This looks different, it's not a main agent delegating to subagents, it's a router.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 22:27:51 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49028908</link><dc:creator>seizethecheese</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49028908</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49028908</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by seizethecheese in "Show HN: Echo – Fable-level results at 1/3 the cost using open-weight models"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>They're obviously not claiming this is a new model that is fable-like at 1/3. It's a router that saves money by only using Fable when necessary. I don't think you should be calling someone's post a "scam" without doing a minimum of research. (I'm not associated with the company, but very interested in this.)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 22:26:36 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49028895</link><dc:creator>seizethecheese</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49028895</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49028895</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by seizethecheese in "Show HN: Echo – Fable-level results at 1/3 the cost using open-weight models"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Sometimes expensive models are cheaper on easier tasks because they use fewer tokens, too.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 22:25:06 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49028873</link><dc:creator>seizethecheese</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49028873</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49028873</guid></item></channel></rss>