<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: seospamsuck</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=seospamsuck</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 06:54:50 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=seospamsuck" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by seospamsuck in "The man who killed Google Search?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This is the correct insight. Google has enough machine learning prowess that they could absolutely offload, with minimal manhours, the creation of a list ranking a bunch of blogspam sites and give them a reverse score by how much they both spam articles or how much they spread the content over the page. Then apply that score to their search result weights.<p>And I know they could because someone did make that list and posted it here last year.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2024 09:44:05 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40142365</link><dc:creator>seospamsuck</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40142365</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40142365</guid></item></channel></rss>