To clarify, are you the author of the animations, or is it anyone/anything else as LLM, as the Claude used?

It seems like some look like of artists' Elliot Sutton (imskyleen at GitHub) and/or and dmytro (pqoqubbw at GitHub).

Oh... and the animation ease effect of rating items is also of dmytro's, isn'it it? It may be seen at:

- https://lucide-animated.com/

In this case, what is the main reason of your/LLMs project, if I may ask? What does it provide the aforementioned don't?

// ----- Edit (+20m)

I see, your project is a port to Vue you started:

- https://github.com/imskyleen/animate-ui/discussions/178

Relatively similar to projects as RadixVue, ShadcnVue, and the following:

- https://github.com/iloomilo/itshover-vue

Just in case, the aforementioned `icones.js.com` is not "new", but a project of Vue Community, initiated by Anthony Fu (antfu at GitHub), who is a member of the Vue core Team.

Regardless, though I don't appreciate use of LLMs (and presenting its output as personal work/effort), I appreciate you heartfelt for the added support for the ineffably marvelous Vue!

The droplet is what I found unexpected, too, indeed. Yet, the overall ideas, including the reverse animations on rotating ones, with some funky ease, is purely genius, I believe...

If the actual animations/work are of hand of the Tim Rietz, the developer signed alongside Claude LLM, the they are a great artist!

Related: https://icones.js.org/

    It seems like the inspiration went from Audacity, and with great changes to the design and feel of calmness and solidity!  
    I've tried loading a file with XM format, yet the current state of the import logic stated "Unsupported". Is there any chance you'll support the format?  

    For example, the following artwork is radiating charmingly in VLC:  
    - https://cable.ayra.ch/modplayer/mods/!Others/DYNAMITE_-_Winamp_5.0RC8_crk.xm

    And, thank you! very much for the experiments, effort, miracles... art you do...

And it is (300,755++ lines from Claude): https://github.com/CraigVG/roman-letters-network

Here, I am sorry, but I just cannot consider it serious nor accountable, since I just cannot trust its data.

If all the information there is valid and verified, every single letter and the authors' word after the LLM's processing, then the "AI" may be dimmed.

Yet, I don't believe so, knowing how unlimitedly every subjective word may change contexts, and using objectified and limited LLM for it?

There's `?scholarly=true` GET parameter mentioned in the `:/CLAUDE.md`, but a quick check of its behavior didn't result in any change.

Regardless, the idea and overall intention that highlights the impact and importance of history, and presents connections between infinitely unique and miraculous people around the infinite world... where every single word carries a life moment... is ineffably magnificent...

Thank you, Craig Vander Galien, for the idea and love in history!

---

    > Modern English translations were produced using Claude (Anthropic), working from either the Latin/Greek original or an existing 19th-century English version. Translation work was guided by two internal documents: a translation guide covering late antique epistolary conventions, rhetorical register, and how to handle common formulaic phrases; and a modern voice guide specifying tone, vocabulary level, and how to avoid archaism while remaining faithful to the original.
    > 
    > AI-generated translations are clearly marked in the interface. They are provided for accessibility and research convenience, not as authoritative scholarly translations. The original Latin or Greek is preserved alongside every translation, and 19th-century English versions are shown where available. Corrections from domain experts are welcome.
    > 
    > Source: https://romanletters.org/about/

It's easier to attack a solution with its source code available, and with an LLM trained on existing vulnerabilities found, and some datacenters/funding available, et voila, you have a system set to reveal flaws in already awesome projects, to be fixed.

This is normal. You just need power, and time. And there must be more found but left undisclosed, for better times, strategic 0days etc.

Who has such power, and funding? Is it possible Linux competitors do pay enthusiasts to attack, reveal, and damage reputation? What if someone who has funding and time, would try attacking their closed source code instead? Regardless, I wish them safety and peace, too.

And not to mention, a yet again, politics agitation...

That said, how much human was involved into this project, if I may ask?

I do not want to disrespect anyone, but I just want to trust your project, and to do so I must know how much there is yours of your own mind you trust yourself.

Art... love still exists! Thank you, dear sanjit, Carolina Moscoso, and Julian Lucas at NewYorker for the ineffably magnificent art... miracles you do...

If no AI was in use for its creation process, I do so wholeheartedly hope, then every single folder features ideas/message in quite genius attitudes, I believe, and the whole work deserves a physical frame!

  Related:
  - 1. https://symfony.com/doc/current/reference/configuration/framework.html#configuration-framework-secret
  - 2. https://laravel.com/docs/13.x/encryption#gracefully-rotating-encryption-keys

Perhaps some movement is needed? I do recall some relatively similar cases saved, if interested:

  1. Moving forward in space (JavaScript/JS): https://codepen.io/the_artwork/pen/zYEdxyo
  2. Rotating in space (JS): https://codepen.io/the_artwork/pen/NWMRYJP
  3. Rotating in space (CSS+JS): https://codepen.io/the_artwork/pen/PoeNyyy

  Freaking awesome article, and relatively novice way of viewpoint presentation, I believe.

  And look! Holy gracious sakes... There’s not a single "em-dash" (—) out there...  
  The absence of the character made my heart warmer…  
  Thank you… dear Yusuf Aytas... for a miracle...

No, sorry, I, nor anyone I know, would trust credentials to any organization with so little transparency and lack of guarantees, also considering audited alternatives.

Oh, and indeed, where is the key card? Is it in an ASCII art somewhere in documentation?

The design is nice, however, but... may I ask, how much non-AI work was done, if any?

  > The macOS version can make stronger guarantees because it can have more complexity. On Linux, the foundation is eBPF, which is powerful but bounded: it has strict limits on storage size and program complexity. Under heavy traffic, cache tables can overflow, which makes it impossible to reliably tie every network packet to a process or a DNS name.  
  > And reconstructing which hostname was originally looked up for a given IP address requires heuristics rather than certainty. The macOS version uses deep packet inspection to do this more reliably.  
  > That's not an option here.
  > 
  > Source: https://web.archive.org/web/20260409002901/https://obdev.at/products/littlesnitch-linux/index.html

Have you ever checked Calico or Cilium, or at least, Oryx?