<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: setquk</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=setquk</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 08:52:06 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=setquk" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by setquk in "Tenants win right to physical keys over smart locks from landlords"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>(if you want to burn all your money on a lawyer that is)<p>It's honestly best to cut your losses and walk away.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 11 May 2019 10:04:02 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19885449</link><dc:creator>setquk</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19885449</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19885449</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by setquk in "Tenants win right to physical keys over smart locks from landlords"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Unlikely. There was some intelligence behind it. He was aware the locks had been changed as I explained his in an SMS so I did what he asked explicitly. Secondly I could apologise for the mistake of leaving the wrong keys inside the property. As for the marmite, some kid did a prank! Ooops. Based on the police's previous attitude, would they likely come out for a bit of marmite in a letterbox.<p>The put the keys through the letterbox thing was actually a masterpiece of idiocy on his part which I refrained from mentioning to him.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2019 14:25:17 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19877982</link><dc:creator>setquk</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19877982</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19877982</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by setquk in "Tenants win right to physical keys over smart locks from landlords"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Hahaha that's never a good thing :)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2019 14:21:25 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19877942</link><dc:creator>setquk</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19877942</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19877942</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by setquk in "Tenants win right to physical keys over smart locks from landlords"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Totally agree. Good to hear this level of enforcement is taking place.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2019 14:04:32 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19877788</link><dc:creator>setquk</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19877788</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19877788</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by setquk in "Tenants win right to physical keys over smart locks from landlords"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I certainly understand how bad it can get for landlords. I'm not excusing any bad tenants here for sure. I will at least read the synopsis for that film :)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2019 14:03:18 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19877776</link><dc:creator>setquk</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19877776</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19877776</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by setquk in "Tenants win right to physical keys over smart locks from landlords"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I did. See one of my other comments.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2019 14:01:40 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19877757</link><dc:creator>setquk</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19877757</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19877757</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by setquk in "Tenants win right to physical keys over smart locks from landlords"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I just asked my other half how she was feeling about it after 16 years and she laughed so clearly petty justice has a lasting effect.<p>I think the person in question would be in vastly larger amounts of trouble for even raising his head above the cesspool he floated in for a moment. It would be like a chase from the Benny Hill show with local housing enforcement, HMRC, the police and a trail of angry and abused tenants.<p>The best move is making the game worthless so there are no winners. Shit on the board. It's a stalemate then.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2019 14:00:40 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19877743</link><dc:creator>setquk</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19877743</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19877743</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by setquk in "Tenants win right to physical keys over smart locks from landlords"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It's not quite that straightforward here in the UK. Well it is but the other way. The landlord has no right to enter a property outright. The property is for exclusive enjoyment by the tenant according to law. They can give 24 hours' notice and enter to do repairs etc but you can refuse that outright and they have no rights beyond that without taking you to court.<p>If they turn up unannounced this is actually harassment under UK law.<p>We had some rather unpleasant slum landlords between the 1950s and 1970s which caused a few laws to be introduced. Unfortunately the nature of being a landlord seems to attract certain people who find new and creative ways to be dicks. Not the majority of landlords I will say who are mostly pretty good, but enough to cause problems.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2019 13:45:09 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19877603</link><dc:creator>setquk</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19877603</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19877603</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by setquk in "Tenants win right to physical keys over smart locks from landlords"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Sometimes it is not about personal gain but making sure that any unfair gains are worthless.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2019 13:39:49 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19877560</link><dc:creator>setquk</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19877560</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19877560</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by setquk in "Tenants win right to physical keys over smart locks from landlords"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>We'll agree to disagree on that. After 22 years of putting up with marmite in the house I still don't like it ;)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2019 13:30:57 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19877487</link><dc:creator>setquk</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19877487</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19877487</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by setquk in "Tenants win right to physical keys over smart locks from landlords"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Yeah that's roughly what happened here. Although I knew he was likely in there because he parked his motorbike outside.<p>He was actually in my 2 year old daughter's bedroom when I opened the door. I heard him leave it and come down the stairs.<p>Small argument ensued and he sent me an SMS right there on his phone saying that he was coming to do an inspection on date X which was that day. Then said "oh sorry must have been delayed" with a smirk on his face, got back on his motorbike and rode off.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2019 13:29:53 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19877477</link><dc:creator>setquk</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19877477</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19877477</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by setquk in "Tenants win right to physical keys over smart locks from landlords"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Actually it's not quite that easy. If you think anyone even gives a crap about this sort of stuff then you're mistaken. Even today.<p>Firstly, I spoke to the police and they said they couldn't do anything because I likely couldn't prove he was snooping and couldn't prove that it wasn't against the terms and it wouldn't be worthy of their time investigating it and it was probably a civil or contractual issue. "go see a solicitor". Which I couldn't afford.<p>Secondly, local housing officer was contacted and I was asked to attend the local council about it and I sat there for 4 hours and was told to go home because they had run out of time. I got a letter apologising and attempts to get a second appointment were fruitless.<p>This was option three.<p>This was one of the points in my life I realised there is no magical state run safety blanket who will protect you from dickheads.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2019 13:25:54 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19877453</link><dc:creator>setquk</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19877453</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19877453</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by setquk in "Tenants win right to physical keys over smart locks from landlords"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I thought I went too far for a few years to be honest. Now I realise that no protection whatsoever was afforded to any private tenants back then other than taking the landlord to court which was expensive, time consuming, resulted in unpaid days off work and generally a waste of time. The moral high ground doesn't necessarily drive the point home either.<p>Now we have a deposit scheme in the UK which stops landlords doing this because the deposit is held in trust. The landlord has to prove it. Therefore there's escrow and a third party involved. Not being in this scheme is illegal and results in fines that go directly to the tenant as well.<p>This action is not necessary now, but changing the locks still is because it's your personal space and security and you genuinely don't know who has access to that unless you do it. Could even be the previous tenants with key copies.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2019 12:47:13 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19877195</link><dc:creator>setquk</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19877195</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19877195</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by setquk in "Tenants win right to physical keys over smart locks from landlords"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Nothing at all. Paid on time every time and basically decorated the place. Went on the market for £100/month more the moment the tenancy expired and he evicted us.<p>The guy ran umbrella companies to hide his assets and address and to rip people off, got caught going through our stuff.<p>He’s still a landlord and has been the director of about 12 companies now in the last 20 years all dissolved.<p>Who’s the bad one? Hmm<p>Edit: also the place we had after that I rented for 11 years with no problems direct from landlord and they were excellent and we were excellent back.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2019 12:37:15 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19877120</link><dc:creator>setquk</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19877120</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19877120</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by setquk in "Tenants win right to physical keys over smart locks from landlords"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>We changed the locks originally because we caught him in the place doing an inspection unannounced. All our clothes had been gone through and the computer turned on. Funny sounding inspection.<p>The marmite was deserved. If you’re going to make someone’s life miserable and insecure for six months then we’re going to roll out the red carpet on pettiness.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2019 12:13:12 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19876984</link><dc:creator>setquk</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19876984</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19876984</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by setquk in "Tenants win right to physical keys over smart locks from landlords"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I did this as well after having a couple of snooping landlords.<p>Also it's empowering. One rental I had, prior to the tenancy deposit protection scheme I had a serial con artist landlord. At the end of the tenancy, he billed my entire £600 deposit return to three companies he owned. One for gardening, one for cleaning and one for maintenance. This made it difficult for a claim to be placed upon him. This was without entering the property, because I had changed the locks. The property was left immaculate. I took photos to cover my arse. Edit: to note I completely ripped out the overgrown garden in that time and cleaned it up to the point it was workable and decorated half the place so I added value to his property. He evicted us because he could rent it out for more money.<p>Retribution was simple. He didn't have a valid address on the tenancy contract. When he asked where to return the keys to, he sent me an SMS to just put them through the letter box. So I did. I put the keys inside a zip lock bag and used an 8 foot bamboo stick to poke them through the letterbox half way down the hall, double locked the security door from the outside and chucked the keys for the actual barrels down the drain in the street. My wife decided to add insult to this injury by spreading marmite all around the inside of the letter box.<p>The next morning I woke up to about 20 missed calls and 3 voice mails calling me all sorts of names and threatening to kill me and was going to sue me for new locks and a new shirt.<p>I went and bought another pay as you go SIM and never heard a thing.<p>Edit: just looked the guy up. He's still going. If you rent in Nottingham, keep an eye out for a cunt who turns up on a motorbike. Ask for a passport or driving license for ID from direct rent landlords, not just business correspondence.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2019 11:41:32 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19876833</link><dc:creator>setquk</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19876833</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19876833</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by setquk in "In Australia, Coal Remains King"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>For now. Apparently we got a big chunk of our energy imported and there’s Brexit on so we’re going back to coal fired Teslas and eating grass and our own shoes pretty soon I reckon.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2019 07:21:45 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19866080</link><dc:creator>setquk</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19866080</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19866080</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by setquk in "The Amazing $1 Microcontroller (2017)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I'm playing with the PIC10F320 at the moment. Minimalism is fun. $0.50 in 1 off quantities. 6-pin SOT-23 package. 16MHz. 0.5K of program space. 64 bytes of RAM. Waveform generator. ADC. Timers. PWM and the coolest thing a configurable logic cell which works while the CPU is asleep.<p>I've got a semi-working morse iambic keyer in that and it uses 40uA of current running flat out. I'm working on sleeps now.  I reckon I can get it down to 100nA average based on the wake time and 20nA sleep current. I can't actually measure down that low even with my 5.5 digit HP 3478A</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2019 21:37:20 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19853684</link><dc:creator>setquk</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19853684</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19853684</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by setquk in "Windows 10 is getting a Microsoft-built Linux kernel"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>My issue is across the whole windows platform not just WSL. If you check large repos out on windows native it sucks too. Rather than just fixing WSL and declaring victory they should fix the NTFS problem.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2019 10:57:21 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19848249</link><dc:creator>setquk</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19848249</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19848249</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by setquk in "Windows 10 is getting a Microsoft-built Linux kernel"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I'd be interested more if they fixed the NTFS performance issues MFT contention on small files. That would have massive platform benefits.<p>But the problem is it's hard and they already forked off ReFS and didn't fix anything really with that.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2019 09:49:21 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19847902</link><dc:creator>setquk</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19847902</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19847902</guid></item></channel></rss>