<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: sgt101</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=sgt101</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 01:13:49 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=sgt101" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by sgt101 in "Inkling: Our Open-Weights Model"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I think...<p>we will see!</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 20:41:44 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48997983</link><dc:creator>sgt101</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48997983</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48997983</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by sgt101 in "Nativ: Run frontier open models locally on your Mac"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>converting a model to MLX is trivially easy as well - just a couple of lines of code and a few minutes wait.<p>I do find that it reliably crashes on the first try, but then it picks up from where it finishes and completes the conversion reliably.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 16:06:09 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48994181</link><dc:creator>sgt101</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48994181</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48994181</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by sgt101 in "Inkling: Our Open-Weights Model"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Some stories recently that China has decided to reign in and manage it's model production landscape much more tightly.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 08:43:20 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48931893</link><dc:creator>sgt101</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48931893</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48931893</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by sgt101 in "Inkling: Our Open-Weights Model"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I think that LeCunns belief was/is that LLM's have limited value and are a dead end, so what they wanted to do was kill any competitor while evolving tech that was/is a winner.<p>Well, he lost his job on that bet... and yet... I do not think that the verdict of history is quite in.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 08:40:49 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48931880</link><dc:creator>sgt101</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48931880</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48931880</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by sgt101 in "Inkling: Our Open-Weights Model"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I don't get this - I can do LORA on my mac... ok I can't do LORA on a 1tn param model, but if I was in the tn parameter model game I would get some kit that I could use to do that...<p>What's their moat / secret sauce?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 08:39:04 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48931860</link><dc:creator>sgt101</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48931860</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48931860</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by sgt101 in "SpaceX bond worth 10% less than issue price – heading for junk bond status"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>You will note that with the unlocks coming there is going to be a lot more spaceX stock on the market quite soon..<p>Currently 4.9% of the company is on the market.<p>Mid Aug... 15%...<p>40% by December.<p>Elon unlocks next June. Could be quite academic by then.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 18:31:59 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48925147</link><dc:creator>sgt101</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48925147</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48925147</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by sgt101 in "Computation as a universal and fundamental concept"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I may have been making this claim, I need to think about this for a while and re read what you have written.<p>This is very helpful though, thank you.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 17:43:58 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48862962</link><dc:creator>sgt101</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48862962</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48862962</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by sgt101 in "Computation as a universal and fundamental concept"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Of course, if our universe is undecidable it must be the case that computable processes can be executed within it, and it might be the case that all of the processes that are ever executed within it are computable... but it might be that some of the processes that are executed are not computable... because the machine may.. or may not?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 17:41:33 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48862925</link><dc:creator>sgt101</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48862925</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48862925</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by sgt101 in "Computation as a universal and fundamental concept"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Computation has turned out to be a far more general concept than I think was imagined, up to the point that many computer scientists now seem to equate computation with the functioning of the universe. Recently it's been shown that  there are real, physical processes which are undecidable (we cannot know  if a latice of atoms has a spectral gap or not, we cannot determine if a specific particle in a fluid flow will reach a specific place or not, we cannot determine if a ray of light will reach a specific target in certain configurations of reflection).<p>Our world appeared computable, but it isn't, even if P=NP.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 16:35:10 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48862209</link><dc:creator>sgt101</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48862209</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48862209</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by sgt101 in "IEEE Rolls Out Large Language Models Training Course"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>>>Relying on such LLMs without understanding their internal logic creates a significant reliability risk. To build tools that work consistently, developers must understand the core principles that govern how the models process information and generate results. By mastering how a model processes information and how its internal settings influence the result, developers can move away from a trial-and-error approach toward a more precise one to ensure the AI tool handles complex data reliably.<p>This is staggering bullshitp. In what way does understanding a transformer allow you to solve the core problem of LLM's that no frontier lab has managed to resolve?<p>>>To fix the problem, retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) forces AI to look up information in a trusted source such as a company’s database.<p>This also is bullshit. Yes, RAG helps and reduces errors, but NOOOO! it does not fix hallucinations...<p>>>Prioritizing data security. When using AI with proprietary code, security is a major concern. Engineers must learn how to set up “private” instances of the models to ensure that sensitive company data stays within a secure cloud environment and is not used to train public versions.<p>This is somewhat true, but really the motive is providing a soverign instance that cannot be withdrawn for arbitary reasons. Fundamentally the big providers are <i>not</i> going to steal your data, they may change the license to allow them to use it in the future, but then all their big customers will leave. So, they won't be able to, probably. What might well happen (and has happened) is that the USA might withdraw access with no notice leaving you high and dry.<p>I want to learn to build a real LLM so I looked at <a href="https://allenai.org/olmo" rel="nofollow">https://allenai.org/olmo</a> where there are instructions and ingredients. But, unfortunately I can't afford the required compute resource so I will have to wait for a bit I guess.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2026 07:40:26 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48828803</link><dc:creator>sgt101</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48828803</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48828803</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by sgt101 in "Bryan Johnson: I have an autoimmune disease. My stomach is eating itself"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I know many will draw a line between Hubris and Nemesis here, but I feel really sorry for this guy and just wish some good health for him. I personally find the whole long life influncing and health hacking movement annoying, but I recognise that many, if not most, of the folks involved are acting in good faith and just trying to feel better themselves or help others feel better.<p>He probably can't any more (I have no idea what the implications of his stomach disorder are, but I don't imagine great). But if he can I hope he has a beer and just relaxes and gets some happy vibes for a time.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2026 13:42:01 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48804456</link><dc:creator>sgt101</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48804456</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48804456</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by sgt101 in "Astrophysicists Puzzle over Webb’s New Universe"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I went to a public lecture by Martin Rees at uni. He asked everyone who read it to put up their hand, then put it down if they understood it. He pointed to the professor of astrophysics who had invited the lecture and said "ok, you! The rest of you, no chance!"</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2026 18:22:10 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48787543</link><dc:creator>sgt101</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48787543</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48787543</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by sgt101 in "Markets are competitive if and only if P != NP"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>In a minute you'll be tellin' folks that those quantum fangdoodles aren't going to revolutionise their stock pickin'!<p>You do realise that you'll never work in this town again? \s :)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2026 17:21:49 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48777447</link><dc:creator>sgt101</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48777447</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48777447</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by sgt101 in "More evidence is consistent with possible ancient life on Mars (2025)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>>>Well, Viking carried an experiment that tried to detect life. Now, the consensus is that it failed, and that the experiment was incapable of creating a useful result given the chemistry of the soil. Some people argue about that, but I am in no way qualified to take part in the debate, so I would back the consensus here.<p>>>What is odd is that there hasn't been a single other mission that's carried any experiment that has the objective of creating that result.<p>>>If the objective is to find life, why isn't anyone actually looking?<p>>>Tell me if what I've said above is in any way factually incorrect.<p>So... you tell me. Why no experiment? Not one in 50 years?<p>In the meantime we've learned a lot about the Martian atmosphere, it's climate, it's history, it's geology, the evolution of it's surface. I would argue that if a Viking 3 had flown with a revised kit that produced a definitive signal we wouldn't have got any of that.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2026 15:00:43 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48707917</link><dc:creator>sgt101</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48707917</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48707917</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by sgt101 in "More evidence is consistent with possible ancient life on Mars (2025)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Well, Viking carried an experiment that tried to detect life. Now, the consensus is that it failed, and that the experiment was incapable of creating a useful result given the chemistry of the soil. Some people argue about that, but I am in no way qualified to take part in the debate, so I would back the consensus here.<p>What is odd is that there hasn't been a single other mission that's carried any experiment that has the objective of creating that result.<p>If the objective is to find life, why isn't anyone actually looking?<p>Tell me if what I've said above is in any way factually incorrect.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2026 14:57:27 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48707880</link><dc:creator>sgt101</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48707880</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48707880</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by sgt101 in "Greece Is Richer. So Why Do So Many Greeks Still Feel Poor?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Frustraged by the endless prattle about GDP, europoors and Brexit, me and my agent frien's sat (manifested) together and brewed up some alternatives:<p><a href="https://x.com/AiSimonThompson/status/2070900546119114970/photo/1" rel="nofollow">https://x.com/AiSimonThompson/status/2070900546119114970/pho...</a><p>I think that median household disposable income is a much better way of looking at this than GDP.<p>2014 is the turn. The US gained shale, isolationism is possible, Trump 2 is created by the general (true) perception that things were good under Trump 1. The European war starts and China is left to dominate Asia.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2026 14:38:04 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48707696</link><dc:creator>sgt101</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48707696</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48707696</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by sgt101 in "More evidence is consistent with possible ancient life on Mars (2025)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Because looking for life on mars sells.<p>"Why are we not spending that money on more social housing?" : Because this is the greatest mystery of our time... (nods all round)<p>"Why are we doing science?": I don't know and I don't care, cut my taxes! (Cheering and mocking comments about nerds.)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2026 14:24:53 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48707563</link><dc:creator>sgt101</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48707563</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48707563</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by sgt101 in "More evidence is consistent with possible ancient life on Mars (2025)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I think the opposite - unless the discovery of life was preceeded or coincidental with the discovery of some other hyper interesting thing (for example, if Martian life has some sort of utility for medicine, maybe) then I think that would be that for Mars exploration missions. Of course there would be many announcements and excited political agreements around "continuing to explore the new frontier" but I think that no more money would appear.<p>I suspect that NASA knows this full well, as do Mars scientists, and I suspect that they are being very careful to make sure that definitive proof does not appear until they understand all sorts of other stuff about the planet.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2026 12:53:08 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48706863</link><dc:creator>sgt101</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48706863</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48706863</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by sgt101 in "Why software engineers are grieving"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It's not about the money, it's about the money.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2026 16:07:27 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48688258</link><dc:creator>sgt101</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48688258</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48688258</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by sgt101 in "Running local models is good now"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>If someone comes into the workshop and takes all the tools (hello Donald) then having a cocktail glass to hand might be a bit of a lucky break.<p>(geddit?)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 19:13:05 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48560447</link><dc:creator>sgt101</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48560447</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48560447</guid></item></channel></rss>