"Codex in ChatGPT desktop app for Linux is now in preview" https://community.openai.com/t/codex-in-chatgpt-desktop-app-...

I was thinking to switch to Caddy but with your experience I'm gonna stay with Traefik and bare with the version issue...

I've tried or sometimes be stupid to work on bugs/features and ask with almost identical prompts with same modal and harness set, and yes, they generate totally different results.

Sometimes the output is unusable and even with extended guidance it will still drift away from what I was expecting.

Sometimes the output is just one shot and follows almost whatever I want.

I then be used to work like this, if the model and harness set does not work for one time, I just start a new session and do it again. And currently there is one of my task working like this.

Chinese were taught to grow in honesty and integrity explicitly for thousand years and it's becoming common consensus when more and more people are educated. When the bar raises and the gov is not given more freedom to the people, it's just nature to let the surveillance cameras grow to each and every inch of the land.

Me personally would chose safety over privacy though.

China now is open freely for almost everyone, come and see by yourslef, if you not living poverty.

The world itslef does not work the propaganda way whether you dislike or hate the gov for whatever reason. And yes you can criticize the gov as you like with the news you read otr the party you pro with, but never assume how the people feel and belives if you are not the people, and if you do then that's the same mindset as Trump or any other war-bringing president the US had, and you know what they did and still doing.

For example, I have my codex pointing to the CPA endpoint and the actual running model is a openai compatible one from an specific provider with specific base URL. I hope this could be considered add into roadmap.

You don't need to remember how to properly line up useState/useEffect/useCallback and all.

You could just insert any simple state object and be ok with it, or insert a well-known state management library and it still works the same way.

For UI libraries they almost always have a vanilla option, and even better, if you are not working with google sheet level of stuff, vanilla element management is much much easier to work with.

And no need to talk about the style frameworks, they always work the vanilla way.

With some default vite configuration, nothing you need to worry anymore and the framework level stuff are simple and easy to understand and is totally manageable.

Is it possible to install some tool, and give it a "dist" fold path and the application is generated all alone?

I'm stupidly lazy, and I hate work with graphical UIs to start a project and input that many fields, make me feel like visiting a 1990 web page requires me registering with tons of information and most of them are useless or at least I can provide later if needed.

a) git pull & push for updates

b) good enough CDN distribution, sometimes interactive examples/project page loads tons of files

c) good enough security promises of the entire platform/infra

d) good enough serviceable time, we do not need 99.9999SLA but better not down often

e) have generous free tier

f) great DX & UX, this one is small but small headache adds up quickly

Let's say talk about this in another more general case: virtual windowing. If anyone has tried to implement stuff and hit performance bottle neck and then find virtual windowing could help, it definitely involves two problems to solve, first is the UI responsiveness when more and more stuff got created and rendered, the object count usually should be way less than "10,000,000", yet still you could hit the wall.

I think I might be too negative about it, but I just want to share the real cases here.