<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: sigbottle</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=sigbottle</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 00:45:15 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=sigbottle" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by sigbottle in "Qwen3.6-35B-A3B: Agentic Coding Power, Now Open to All"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>That... is a more plausible explanation I didn't think of.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 14:46:35 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47793826</link><dc:creator>sigbottle</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47793826</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47793826</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by sigbottle in "Qwen3.6-35B-A3B: Agentic Coding Power, Now Open to All"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Is quantization a mostly solved pipeline at this point? I thought that architectures were varied and weird enough where you can't just click a button, say "go optimize these weights", and go. I mean new models have new code that they want to operate on, right, so you'd have to analyze the code and insert the quantization at the right places, automatically, then make sure that doesn't degrade perf?<p>Maybe I just don't understand how quantization works, but I thought quantization was a very nasty problem involving a lot of plumbing</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 14:46:03 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47793814</link><dc:creator>sigbottle</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47793814</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47793814</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by sigbottle in "Google, Microsoft, Meta All Tracking You Even When You Opt Out"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Forget the "Humans must always be in the loop for accountability" argument against AI, we already don't have such checks today!</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 16:30:59 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47767811</link><dc:creator>sigbottle</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47767811</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47767811</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by sigbottle in "The Future of Everything Is Lies, I Guess: Safety"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Interesting you single out commercial and government entities but not people. What defines the difference? Bureaucracy? Concentration of resources? Legal theory?<p>I guess I'm trying to wonder why this line of thinking (in theory) doesn't turn to paranoia about everybody. I don't know much ethics or political theory or anything.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 18:18:34 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47755922</link><dc:creator>sigbottle</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47755922</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47755922</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by sigbottle in "Tell HN: Docker pull fails in Spain due to football Cloudflare block"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>That's actually an interesting argument <i>for</i> centralization, when it comes to interoperability concerns. I have never thought about it.<p>Of course, the standard response <i>against</i> centralization is that the centralized entity can sneak backdoors and turn at the drop of a hat.<p>Maybe something like a signal-like model might be good, in that regard, as opposed to mesh networks.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 15:39:14 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47753611</link><dc:creator>sigbottle</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47753611</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47753611</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by sigbottle in "Tell HN: Docker pull fails in Spain due to football Cloudflare block"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Things have mostly gotten better through centralization and unification, which is certainly a way of getting better.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 15:01:41 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47753022</link><dc:creator>sigbottle</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47753022</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47753022</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by sigbottle in "AI Will Be Met with Violence, and Nothing Good Will Come of It"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Does economics or political theory focus on centralization, practically speaking? Not as a normative claim. What the actual effects are like. It just feels like we're at a centralization of power of unprecedented scale, to the point where no previous theories or models could really apply (in order to make analytical progress - I mean sure feudalism is honestly becoming a scarier and scarier analogy but still, there are significant differences)<p>I'm pretty much only thinking about these kinds of problems at my job at this point, so this is important to me in that regard</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2026 17:17:06 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47742117</link><dc:creator>sigbottle</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47742117</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47742117</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by sigbottle in "Why meaningful days look like nothing while you are living them"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I converse enough with LLMs for research at this point where I feel I have a good enough structure to hop on/off them to primary sources and stuff, so I don't get annoyed with them too easily.<p>Whereas I haven't seriously reflected on my social media consumption habits for over 15 years, and over the years I'm getting more and more annoyed at social media.<p>Not to be a bit misanthropic, but there's something seriously wrong with my social media usage, especially when I know there's a real human on the other side, combined with ever increasing annoyance towards commenters and just the feelings I get after reading social media.<p>It may be dopamine / self-help related, but no actually, I think all of that is part of the issue (discovered that in high school when it was taking off). Something about the way I'm fundamentally interacting with the medium seems so horrible and icky the more I mature.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2026 07:46:53 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47737047</link><dc:creator>sigbottle</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47737047</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47737047</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by sigbottle in "Hegel, a universal property-based testing protocol and family of PBT libraries"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Look, I read Continental philosophers too and I think they're cool, my point is that that kind of statement isn't what an analytic philosopher would say</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 14:34:36 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47718792</link><dc:creator>sigbottle</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47718792</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47718792</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by sigbottle in "OpenAI backs Illinois bill that would limit when AI labs can be held liable"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Well the point of capitalism (going back to Adam Smith) is that the invisible hand converts locally selfish behavior to globally good outcomes. The argument is whether or not that emerges. So if your implication was that human trait was selfishness, yes, that is quite the point of capitalism.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 14:29:27 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47718720</link><dc:creator>sigbottle</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47718720</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47718720</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by sigbottle in "How NASA built Artemis II’s fault-tolerant computer"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>>  making this type of deterministic and WCET (worst case execution time) a dominant computing paradigm.<p>Oh wow, really? I never knew that. huh.<p>I feel like as I grow older, the more I start to appreciate history. Curse my naive younger self! (Well, to be fair, I don't know if I would've learned history like <i>that</i> in school...)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 10:06:33 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47715841</link><dc:creator>sigbottle</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47715841</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47715841</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by sigbottle in "Hegel, a universal property-based testing protocol and family of PBT libraries"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Also I thought that 20th century analytic thought dissolved metaphysics entirely and didn't want to talk about it. I mean sure then you can question, "why delete metaphysics" but then you can't say that the 20th century brought this kind of stuff<p>> It treated ontological Being as fixed, as beings nailed to a wall, lifeless and immobile.<p>This reads more as a response to Plato & Kant</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 01:45:50 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47712604</link><dc:creator>sigbottle</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47712604</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47712604</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by sigbottle in "Hegel, a universal property-based testing protocol and family of PBT libraries"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Wait I thought Heidegger claimed that title? Or is he the guy who shifted Being from a noun to a verb, and Hegel's still focusing on the noun (just that the noun itself is a moving concept)?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 01:41:48 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47712571</link><dc:creator>sigbottle</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47712571</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47712571</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by sigbottle in "Hegel, a universal property-based testing protocol and family of PBT libraries"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Yo what has been the coolest thing about Hegel's philosophy you learned?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 20:02:28 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47709017</link><dc:creator>sigbottle</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47709017</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47709017</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by sigbottle in "Hegel, a universal property-based testing protocol and family of PBT libraries"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I'm starting with the Science of Logic!<p>I want to cry...</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 20:02:03 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47709010</link><dc:creator>sigbottle</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47709010</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47709010</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by sigbottle in "Lichess and Take Take Take Sign Cooperation Agreement"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Well for the chess world, open source world (BDFL), etc probably okay. For real world governments...</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 16:21:14 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47705628</link><dc:creator>sigbottle</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47705628</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47705628</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by sigbottle in "Issue: Claude Code is unusable for complex engineering tasks with Feb updates"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I mean yeah ultimately it's a tool and I've even leaned off of AI recently for coding because it was exhausting dealing with all its hallucinations</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 19:49:54 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47695379</link><dc:creator>sigbottle</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47695379</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47695379</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by sigbottle in "US cities are axing Flock Safety surveillance technology"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>No, we <i>should</i> build the massive, privately-owned, nationwide surveillance apparatus with taxpayer money! It's for science, after all! We have no data on whether or not cameras covering every square inch of space, hooked up to a centralized surveillance database is actually good for society. We need to conduct this <i>methodologically</i> and <i>scientifically</i>. We'll be able to come to an objective conclusion with enough testing!</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 19:44:30 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47695308</link><dc:creator>sigbottle</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47695308</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47695308</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by sigbottle in "Issue: Claude Code is unusable for complex engineering tasks with Feb updates"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I mean humans do that too, and I don't think it's very unjustified. The "we deduce from a deep base premise P down a chain of inferences" picture is extremely incomplete and has been challenged all over the place - by normal people, by analytic and continental philosophers, by science itself, etc.<p>Not trying to say that LLM's are equivalent to humans but that the concept of reasoning is undefined.<p>And the fact that their performance <i>does</i> increase when using test-time compute is empirical evidence that they're doing something that increases their performance on tasks that we consider would require reasoning. As to what that is, we don't know.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 12:04:47 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47689058</link><dc:creator>sigbottle</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47689058</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47689058</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by sigbottle in "The cult of vibe coding is insane"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>am layman. is CV "solved" at this point, or is there more work to be done?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 20:04:34 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47666261</link><dc:creator>sigbottle</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47666261</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47666261</guid></item></channel></rss>