<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: simcop2387</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=simcop2387</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 03:48:09 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=simcop2387" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by simcop2387 in "Ollaya – Ollama for open-source, Jev-style decision models"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Probably Kev and/or the decider models.  Kev is trained on one of the 4B qwen models, similar for decider but it ranges from 0.8B through to the 35B-A3B model so far I believe.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2026 20:45:15 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49849729</link><dc:creator>simcop2387</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49849729</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49849729</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by simcop2387 in "Meta VR Glasses"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Obviously, none of us have any proof, but I'm on board with the theory that they've been lobbying for it to push things subtly. Specifically because it looks like a lot of these laws are being made to absolve the person creating the gate of responsibility and liability when the gate is there, even if it fails. The idea of the theory being that if they can push that part in then it's better off for them rather than if it's done in a vacuum where they can end up responsible.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2026 01:47:01 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49825192</link><dc:creator>simcop2387</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49825192</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49825192</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by simcop2387 in "Asahi Linux on M3"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>You wouldnt be using coreml since thats apples software, but likely vulkan versions of llama.cpp or pytorch or what have you. How well that works at the moment i dont know</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2026 19:16:42 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49589809</link><dc:creator>simcop2387</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49589809</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49589809</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by simcop2387 in "A third world engineer responds to “RISC-V: They should have known better”"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Take a look at some of the really new ones, like the Milk-V Jupiter 2 based around the SpaceMIT K3[0].  Single core is still lacking but the multi-core isn't all that far behind a pi5 (350 vs 900 single core and 1700 vs 2100 multicore in a geekbench beta version).<p>And I will note that the other poster didn't say they beat it, just that there are lots of chips being built.  I'd imagine that the cores on the tenstorrent cards would blow all the other arm cores out of the water if you could run the benchmarks on them directly, given the much higher core speeds and memory bandwidth etc.<p>[0] <a href="https://youtu.be/vSKA6thLI1U?t=993" rel="nofollow">https://youtu.be/vSKA6thLI1U?t=993</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2026 23:11:57 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49324751</link><dc:creator>simcop2387</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49324751</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49324751</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by simcop2387 in "A third world engineer responds to “RISC-V: They should have known better”"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> The main roadblock to the existence of fast RISC-V cores is the entrenchment of large x86 and arm ecosystems.<p>I'd disagree with that, their existence and decades of a head start mean they've been much more well invested but that's one of the things we're starting to see change, even if it's because of what would appear to be political motivations.  We're starting to see a lot of investment into it in China because it looks like it's a reasonable way for tech sovereignty against the x86 monopoly.  They've got licenses to some older (not sure about newer) AMD processor designs, I think around Zen2 architecture, for one of their major manufacturing firms but that won't easily let them move forward since they've got to do a lot of work to keep it up with compatibility and performance for newer ISA additions and such.  That's one of the reasons they've been subsiding development of LoongSong64 and RISC-V to the point where for a while the larger LoongSong64 cores were illegal to export to some countries[0].<p>And then you've got a lot of other companies building faster RISC-V cores, for yes more embedded style designs but not the usual traditional embedded designs either.  You've got TensTorrent working on AI work loads with real hardware out there that at least for ML stuff can compete on inference if you can get your software to run on it, and then you've got Bolt doing similar for GPU workloads[1].  While both of those are closer to embedded since you're not going to use them as a desktop, they're still making really fast RISC-V cores that could be theoretically turned into a standard RVA23 core by adding the missing extensions to make it work.  That's of course not trivial but the entrenchment of x86 and arm aren't quite as daunting as they might have originally seemed.<p>It's still not as fast as I'd like, simply because I want to start seeing some RISC-V mini pcs get made that are fine for a daily driver office pc to happen.<p>[0] <a href="https://www.tomshardware.com/news/china-bans-exports-of-its-loongson-cpus-to-russia-other-countries" rel="nofollow">https://www.tomshardware.com/news/china-bans-exports-of-its-...</a><p>[1] <a href="https://bolt.graphics/" rel="nofollow">https://bolt.graphics/</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2026 23:02:42 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49324672</link><dc:creator>simcop2387</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49324672</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49324672</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by simcop2387 in "Firefox for iOS now has a native adblocker"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Mostly so, it's got all the limitations of Manifest V3 which prevents it from doing a good bit of blocking, <a href="https://ublockorigin.com/#manifest-v3-section" rel="nofollow">https://ublockorigin.com/#manifest-v3-section</a><p>In particular:<p>* Cannot use all filter lists simultaneously (rule limits apply)<p>* No cosmetic filtering in the default mode<p>* No scriptlet injection by default<p>* Limited dynamic filtering capabilities<p>* Requires broader host permissions upfront<p>But it's definitely still better than no adblockers</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2026 15:23:15 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49320919</link><dc:creator>simcop2387</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49320919</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49320919</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by simcop2387 in "FreeInk: Open ecosystem for e-readers"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Yep, first instance I know of was from back in 2009, <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2009/jul/17/amazon-kindle-1984" rel="nofollow">https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2009/jul/17/amazon-ki...</a> and the kind of thing keeps happening over the years.  It'll continue to happen since you aren't paying for a book.  You're paying for a license to read the book for as long as the publisher/owner allows you to do so and they can revoke the permission at any time.<p>I still find it hilariously ironic that the first instance that was widely reported (as far as I know) was it happening to 1984.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 20:10:50 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48997561</link><dc:creator>simcop2387</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48997561</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48997561</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by simcop2387 in "Homomorphically encrypted CIFAR-10 inference in 200ms"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It'll be very useful for even local setups when the data needs to be confidential. Look at the research related to medical training of llms (ignore their current lack of direct usefulness/trustworthiness, those are potentially solvable), with a homomorphically encrypted session, the large inference servers never see hipaa protected data in a way that exposes it if the server is compromised even if its an on premises setup in your doctors office processing the data, reducing risk of the data leaking anywhere.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 19:15:31 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48951193</link><dc:creator>simcop2387</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48951193</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48951193</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by simcop2387 in "AMD silently removes memory encryption from consumer Ryzen CPUs"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It's more than just for cryo-freezing and attacks like that, it also helps defend against row-hammer and other DRAM refresh related issues since the scrambling means that the host kernel or application can't determine what the physical bits on the chips are going to actually be and end up determining the layout in a way to flip specific bits.  It might still be possible but it's yet another layer of defense against memory related security problems.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2026 16:46:58 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48588111</link><dc:creator>simcop2387</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48588111</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48588111</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by simcop2387 in "Lore – Open source version control system designed for scalability"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The five command part isn't really possible but you can use custom diffs for merges, git diff, etc. pretty easily.  There are projects like diffsitter ( <a href="https://github.com/afnanenayet/diffsitter" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/afnanenayet/diffsitter</a> ) for doing more intelligent diffs like this for supported languages.<p>EDIT: and then an example for the merge stuff I couldn't find while typing before: <a href="https://mergiraf.org/" rel="nofollow">https://mergiraf.org/</a> and HN discussion a few years ago: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42093756">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42093756</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2026 14:45:19 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48571270</link><dc:creator>simcop2387</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48571270</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48571270</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by simcop2387 in "Your ePub Is Fine. Kobo Disagrees. Blame Adobe"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I think its one reason ive been happy with software based epub readers where upgrading is usually reasonable to do. Either on my phone or android based eink reader. That said if they change too much then yea nobody will produce the new standard and only support the old one if it isnt carefully designed for graceful degredation.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2026 23:47:07 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48534411</link><dc:creator>simcop2387</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48534411</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48534411</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by simcop2387 in "Police officer investigated for using AI to 'create evidence' in multiple cases"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Hows wolfie doing?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2026 23:30:10 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48522523</link><dc:creator>simcop2387</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48522523</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48522523</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by simcop2387 in "PicoPCMCIA – a PCMCIA development board for retro-computing enthusiasts"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Neat, definitely a part of history that I'm not familiar enough with myself since I was only ~6 or so around then when the article was published.<p>It definitely seems to reinforce the joke backronym of "People Can't Memorize Computer Industry Acronyms" for the whole thing given how badly it was all refered to.  It's a lot like the whole Clippit/Clippy situation with the Microsoft Office assistants.  Originally it was only named Clippit but Clippy got coined by everyone else and even Microsoft ended up giving in and using it in marketing materials not too long after the fact.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2026 17:50:15 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46768987</link><dc:creator>simcop2387</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46768987</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46768987</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by simcop2387 in "PicoPCMCIA – a PCMCIA development board for retro-computing enthusiasts"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>My understanding (probably wrong) is that pcmcia was based off the ISA bus and then pc card updated to pci based and express card was pcie</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2026 17:13:10 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46708478</link><dc:creator>simcop2387</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46708478</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46708478</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by simcop2387 in "OrangePi 6 Plus Review"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The Pi 3B doesn't have UEFI support, so it requires special support on the distro side for the boot process but for the 4 and newer you can flash (or it'll already be there, depending on luck and age of the device) the firmware on the board to support UEFI and USB boot, though installing is a bit of a pain since there's no easy images to do it with.  <a href="https://wiki.debian.org/RaspberryPi4" rel="nofollow">https://wiki.debian.org/RaspberryPi4</a><p>I believe some other distros also have UEFI booting/installers setup for PI4 and newer devices because of this, though there's a good chance you'll want some of the other libraries that come with Raspberry PI OS (aka Raspbian) still for some of the hardware specific features like CSI/DSI and some of the GPIO features that might not be fully upstreamed yet.<p>There's also a port of Proxmox called PXVirt (Formerly Proxmox Port) that exists to use a number of similar ARM systems now as a virtualization host with a nice ui and automation around it.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2025 20:09:58 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46404803</link><dc:creator>simcop2387</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46404803</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46404803</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by simcop2387 in "Linux computer designed with AI boots on first attempt"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Pretty reasonable place to start.  I'm curious how it would fare in an emc/rf test.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2025 00:00:48 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46296472</link><dc:creator>simcop2387</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46296472</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46296472</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by simcop2387 in "10 Years of Let's Encrypt"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>For IoT myself i'm wondering if it's something that could be thrown into the Matter side of things, make the hub/border router act as an ACME server with it's own CA that gives out mTLS certs so the devices can validate the hub and the hub can validate the devices.  It'd never be implemented properly by the swarms of cheap hardware out there but I can dream...</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2025 23:09:17 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46211990</link><dc:creator>simcop2387</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46211990</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46211990</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by simcop2387 in "Run Docker containers natively in Proxmox 9.1 (OCI images)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Largely management, observability, and then the way that docker mucks with firewalls.  Running them this way will allow proxmox to handle all that in the same way {I assume) as the LXC and VMS so automation, and all the rest can be consistent</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2025 23:03:40 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45999090</link><dc:creator>simcop2387</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45999090</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45999090</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by simcop2387 in "ICE bought vehicles equipped with fake cell towers to spy on phones"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Likely due to areas that still have only 2g coverage.  Still a lot of that in rural usa</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2025 22:36:07 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45509797</link><dc:creator>simcop2387</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45509797</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45509797</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by simcop2387 in "PuTTY has a new website"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Sometimes, lots of companies will lock down WSL and similar because they can't as easily control what's running in it for security or policy reasons. In those cases putting would be easier to audit and deal with since it's much more single purpose</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2025 15:43:50 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44924421</link><dc:creator>simcop2387</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44924421</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44924421</guid></item></channel></rss>