So much vitriol here today, jeez.

Is it? The person you responded to sees car crashes as an important issue to solve yet still calls it "car accidents". So maybe it's not that important after all.

Nothing makes me saltier than language policing; I'd say fixing _that_ broken language is more of a step towards fixing issues than the actual language itself.

I also use jj as my daily driver now. I like it a lot. I have no skin in the game either.

I know that jj isn't for everyone, but for me it's been trivial to see the state of and update all the stacks of branches I have on the go.

Not that I don't welcome this feature; I just think I don't need it anymore.

    x: Ann's current age
    y: The age difference between Ann and Mary

    24 = x + y      (ie. their current ages)
    x = (24/2) + y  (ie. their age in the past)

    Solve for y in one equation and plug it into the other. You'll get x = 18.

Is it purely more secure because they can't exfiltrate your secret keys to publish again?

I feel like if your workflow gets pwned you'd be rotating your keys anyways, so I'm not sure if the vendor lock-in is worth it.

When I lead teams and thought of how to motivate them to get certain things done, like code quality, I found it best to frame why certain things got done as a mixture of constraints and incentives. ie. What was preventing people from doing a thing and what motivated them to do thing.

You're basically arguing that there's no constraints to these problems and that people are incentivized to proliferate them. Do you distrust people that much?

Isn't it easier to surmise that there could be a lot of constraints and not a lot of incentives to solve these issues?

Or heck... just a shit ton of constraints than incentives?

I mean... there are people who are incentivized to keep drug use going: drug dealers and kingpins. And I'm sure there are some with their hand in governments. But there's no way that's the default.

You can also use fixed-point if whatever you're using supports it but it's still technically integers.

The average (and above-average?) investor really does not understand tech.

> These products use very low level Linux primitives like containers, Kubernetes, Firecracker microVMs, and networked protocols.

Out of anything that is a "low level linux primitive" I could maybe argue that networking? protocols fit the bill.

And it's obviously fully AI-generated! Which I wouldn't even care about if I could actually trust the content, which I can't!

I'm putting this into my overflowing bucket of internet comments that doesn't "get" Canadians. Sorry to be curt but, since Canada-USA relations has been more at the forefront, I've seen too many comments that just "don't get it" and it riles me up each time.

They've had the 2nd amendment since their country was founded. It has no bearing on relations between the two countries, both at a micro and macro level.

We respect that they are their own country and have their own ways of doing things, which isn't even the same across each state. We respect US sovereignty over their own laws. It's the lack of respect for ours by the current US administration that is upsetting.

That's basically all its come down to. Oh, and the tariffs don't help either.

Now that's a special kind of joke I can only find on HackerNews