What makes the CBM-II's 6509 fundamentally different from the C128's 8502+8722 combo? And what makes either fundamentally different from the segmentation scheme of the 8086/8088?

Unless you use bank switching, which historically a lot of 6502 machines did use (e.g. Apple III/IIe/IIc, BBC Master 128, Commodore 128, Commodore CBM-II, etc)

While I certainly welcome this in the JDK, in practice it hasn't been a huge issue since a lot of people just use Bouncycastle to get that support.

To be clear, the issue is not that it says that text is AI-generated – that text is indeed AI-generated. The issue is the detection reason it gives:

Repeated sentence openers · 3 sentences opening “-”

A nested markdown list is not a reliable sign of AI-generation, humans were using them long before any AI was.

Similarly, its second "AI tell" is:

Echoing sentence runs · 2 sentences echoing “google sso auto create”

Two sentences beginning with the `GOOGLE_SSO_AUTO_CREATE_` is not a sign of AI generation, it is a sign of quoting code

Only the third match is a genuine "sign of AI generation"

Maybe the US should look at copying it? Well, Trump has expressed interest in doing so. [1] But, Australia has had something like this since the 1990s, so even if the US adopted the Australian model tomorrow, it would take a few decades for it to really make an impact.

[0] https://www.thesenior.com.au/story/9346972/age-pension-spend...

[1] https://www.ncpers.org/blog/what-trumps-interest-in-australi...

- add to your README links to download the relevant .gguf files – I assume from HuggingFace?

- or even implement your own equivalent of `ollama pull`/`list`/`rm`/etc

- add some CI using Github Actions (or an alternative if you prefer)

- as well as `go install github.com/computerex/dlgo/cmd/dlgo@latest`, also document `go install github.com/computerex/dlgo/cmd/dlgo-vision@latest`, `go install github.com/computerex/dlgo/cmd/dlgo-image@latest`, etc (obvious to anyone experienced with Go, not to many inexperienced with it)

actually, I try running `go install github.com/computerex/dlgo/cmd/...@latest` on my Mac and I get a lot of errors; some of them are because `cmd/gpu-watchdog` is trying to use Windows-specific APIs (e.g. `syscall.NewLazyDLL`) even on macOS

Now, the text I pasted in so happened to really be AI-generated, but I don't think using markdown bulleted lists is a reliable sign of AI-generation.

The vendors have an obvious motivation to make their writing less off-putting, and I don't think there is any hard architectural limit preventing them from doing so, it is just a matter of prioritising it and investing the necessary engineering resources.

If you are using multiple models – especially models from multiple vendors – then you aren't dealing with a single "model's knowledge space".

But in practice, who uses models “zero-shot”? It is standard for coding agents to review their own code even before returning to the user — so a zero-shot agent invocation isn’t a zero-shot model invocation. And then many users will get a different run of the agent to review the change a(frequently even a different model being invoked by a different harness-e.g. I personally mix Claude, Copilot and Cursor)

> This is the reason everybody does the same thing.

If you have a human-in-the-loop reviewing the agent output, different humans will have different opinions on what the agent should have done instead, and they’ll tell the agent to redo its output in different ways. And then they tire of repeating themselves, and it becomes guidelines in AGENTS.md.

Additionally, a coding agent asked to add a feature to a large code base will frequently check for the code base’s existing design and coding patterns, and so will end up producing very different code than it would have given a blank slate.

I want to be respectful of other people's privacy, but it isn't hard to find the author's Facebook/LinkedIn/etc, at which point their non-identity with the famous novelist becomes obvious.

As someone who is opposed to capital punishment, I actually think public executions are a good thing.

If this is what people want, they should be allowed and encouraged to watch it. Maybe doing so might result in some of them deciding it isn't actually what they want, after all.

If you are charged based on usage, you can “soft switch” between them really quickly.

Many psychologists who belong to different schools of thought – e.g. CBT, positive psychology – don't agree those practices are helpful and don't agree with their theoretical underpinnings

There is a lack of high quality empirical evidence for both the safety and efficacy of the kinds of practices you advocate, and also for the theories which motivate them. By contrast, more mainstream approaches such as CBT have significantly better empirical support

This sounds like a great way to implant false memories

I have an ADHD diagnosis. The only particularly traumatic thing in my childhood was my parents getting divorced when I was a teenager because my mother had an affair. I already had some symptoms of it before that happened. Prior to that, my parents might not have been the best parents you could possibly have, but they didn’t do anything that would merit the label “severe childhood trauma”