>introduced a level of cognitive complexity that makes Kierkegaard read like Hemingway.

and I fucking lost it.

I can't even call this LLM smell at this point it's a stench.

The way I see it, the non-friendly type shares a lot in common with the concept of shibboleth. Which is to say, you can absolutely make sarcastic insults to the detriment of someone else for your own, or a friend's enjoyment, by relying on shared exclusive knowledge. (In essence, holding that shared context above the other person in contempt) However, you can also just be abrasive for your own enjoyment, and that's something entirely differently. (Sadism, for example, is not inherently sarcastic) People frequently confuse the two, but without ironic context - a knowledge of false belief - it is not ironic, and therefore not sarcasm.

This seems... dead wrong. In the examples in the article, both comic frames function as sarcasm, because everyone involved has no illusion that anyone is going to die if they don't see the film. The irony is entirely in the speaker's statement, which everyone knows to be false, including them. People treat 'ironic insults' as sarcasm, but this only works amongst good friends who have the shared context necessary to understand the falsity of the insult. But, then socially incompetent see this and attempt it, and fail to achieve the sarcastic humour. Which is probably why people conflate sarcasm with... failed sarcasm, frankly.

I used to try to be very organized and adopt different systems to do so. Unfortunately due to the variety of things I do, I ended up creating the XKCD "you now have 14 competing standards" problem. My efforts to impose order only created more chaos. I have since just created a big monolithic txt file for notes, and a directory sorted by date modified. Delete old things, rename new things appropriately, and then use proper search tools like Voidtools Everything. When a project is complete, that's when I start organizing it, because that's when I know what it should look like. I don't understand how people can work with inconsistent and constantly changing structure.

straight: DAA DA-DA DA DA, DA DA

swung: DAA DA D-DA DA, DA DA

I hope my highly rigorous notation is helpful here

edit - in hindsight this has nothing to do with your problem

Don't think that we don't see this.

If you are creative enough, you can consider the entire physical universe to be memory of your state machine. Just add some sensors. Then it doesn't really seem so controversial to call it unbounded anymore right? Perspective, perspective.

  >'petertodd' is a terminal disease that ultimately results in death.
  >'petertodd' has no natural predators because it killed them all.
  >'petertodd' is the 'I' in 'Team'.
  >'petertodd' doesn't get mad, it gets even.
  >'petertodd' doesn't make mistakes. It just has unintended consequences.
  >'petertodd' is the software equivalent of 'Cthulu'.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34762051

Just saw these back to back within an hour or two. I'm speed running baader-meinhof. Or maybe the poster found this article by searching for iatrogenic? Maybe something recently gave the word a spike in popularity? Google trends shows a flat line, and I assume this word is pretty rare. Just made me curious.

On topic: yeah I don't use a cellphone that much either.