<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: slopinthebag</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=slopinthebag</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2026 06:04:53 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=slopinthebag" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by slopinthebag in "Software Engineering fundamentals matter more"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>What makes GTA a simulation and not just a different implementation of the laws of nature and downtown LA?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2026 21:01:13 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49323630</link><dc:creator>slopinthebag</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49323630</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49323630</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by slopinthebag in "Software Engineering fundamentals matter more"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>How would it?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2026 17:51:40 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49322119</link><dc:creator>slopinthebag</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49322119</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49322119</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by slopinthebag in "Software Engineering fundamentals matter more"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Excavator can dig a ditch better than I can, thus it must be more capable than me in every physical dimension.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2026 16:14:17 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49321348</link><dc:creator>slopinthebag</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49321348</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49321348</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by slopinthebag in "Software Engineering fundamentals matter more"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>First of all this isn't true. We cannot yet build something which has <i>all</i> the output associated with reasoning.<p>But secondary to that, symbols != semantics. If I had a magical machine which could appear from the outside to be reasoning, but upon closer introspection was simply <i>simulating</i> reasoning, by definition it would not be reasoning. And yet that is the criterion you seem to think indicates reasoning ability. So it's not a sufficient criterion.<p>Claiming we've figured out the fundamentals behind reasoning is hopelessly naive.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2026 16:12:50 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49321335</link><dc:creator>slopinthebag</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49321335</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49321335</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by slopinthebag in "Software Engineering fundamentals matter more"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This is just pure unbridled reductionism. "Show me a single atom in the human body that is 'alive'. You can't? Therefore we're all zombies...."<p>Reasoning is an emergent property of complex systems. Prediction is not. Thus you cannot claim reasoning drives prediction.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2026 16:12:48 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49321334</link><dc:creator>slopinthebag</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49321334</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49321334</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by slopinthebag in "Software Engineering fundamentals matter more"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It's not always cheating either. They aren't intelligent, so they don't actually understand the purpose of the tests or can build them to define the actual semantics of the problem space. It's literally just next-token prediction based on the codebase and prompt. Cheating implies that they have agency, and ironically agents don't.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2026 06:50:28 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49317525</link><dc:creator>slopinthebag</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49317525</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49317525</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by slopinthebag in "Software Engineering fundamentals matter more"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Where is the reasoning in linear regression?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2026 06:46:18 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49317510</link><dc:creator>slopinthebag</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49317510</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49317510</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by slopinthebag in "Software Engineering fundamentals matter more"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Basically all the examples of LLM's building impressive things have been because they have <i>human written</i> tests to base the implementation on. If you have an LLM write the tests the results are far less impressive or valuable.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2026 05:51:38 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49317260</link><dc:creator>slopinthebag</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49317260</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49317260</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by slopinthebag in "Software Engineering fundamentals matter more"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Why would "reasoning" be an emergent property of prediction?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2026 05:47:56 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49317244</link><dc:creator>slopinthebag</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49317244</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49317244</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by slopinthebag in "Software Engineering fundamentals matter more"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>They're RLHF'ed to an inch of their lives to be able to one-shot complete tasks, since requiring human input defeats the purpose of being able to replace the labor force.<p>But once the insanity ends LLMs will be packaged as tools for developers to use to boost their productivity, and we'll consider them as we do IDE's and debuggers and stuff. But we have to get through this hype cycle first.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2026 05:40:35 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49317211</link><dc:creator>slopinthebag</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49317211</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49317211</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by slopinthebag in "AI has access to a vastly larger working memory than the human brain"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Depends how you define intelligence. I struggle to consider LLMs actually intelligent, at least for any definition of intelligence that I would be content by.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2026 23:28:26 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49315270</link><dc:creator>slopinthebag</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49315270</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49315270</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by slopinthebag in "Engineers will do anything to avoid learning from history"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I don’t quite understand the management analogy. Agents aren’t people, they’re code generation machines. Part of managing is delegating and trusting the output of your employees without having to verify everything yourself. But if you’re “managing” an agent, how does that work? You can’t exactly hold an LLM responsible if it fucks something up.<p>Or are people really just yoloing and not even verifying that the code generation is correct? I know it’s a bit of a meme, but are people actually doing the meme in irl where there are actual consequences??</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2026 23:17:31 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49315196</link><dc:creator>slopinthebag</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49315196</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49315196</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by slopinthebag in "Working with AI feels more like leadership than coding"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>If you consider Anthropic’s software as “good results” than I’m inclined to believe it’s the opposite.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2026 20:38:09 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49314117</link><dc:creator>slopinthebag</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49314117</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49314117</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by slopinthebag in "Working with AI Feels More Like Leadership Than Coding"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I don’t agree, sorry. The LLM is a code generation machine, it’s nice because it can generate code much faster than my hands can. But it’s not management or leadership because there is no human element there. And the workflow is still code generation, as much as people want to make agents <i>the</i> thing.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2026 20:14:52 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49313913</link><dc:creator>slopinthebag</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49313913</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49313913</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by slopinthebag in "France's top court blocks social media ban for under-15s"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Smoking is becoming cool again because lets face it, vaping makes you look like a bit of a nonce. Nicotine pouches are good too, but I think it's mostly men who use them.<p>But yeah, smoking is on the rise. I'm a youngish person and whenever I go out and meet others, it's quite rare for someone to turn down a cig.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2026 00:38:06 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49306348</link><dc:creator>slopinthebag</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49306348</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49306348</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by slopinthebag in "What garbage collection actually costs"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Much rarer and easier problem to deal with. Besides, bump allocators are widely used in games programming, which essentially eliminates this entire class of performance issues. Good luck using one in a GC'ed language.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2026 00:32:15 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49306307</link><dc:creator>slopinthebag</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49306307</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49306307</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by slopinthebag in "What garbage collection actually costs"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The difference is that you don't need to be pushing the boundaries at all to get into trouble with the GC. All you have to do is use it as it's intended.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2026 00:27:55 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49306276</link><dc:creator>slopinthebag</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49306276</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49306276</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by slopinthebag in "GLM-5.3: Frontier coding with emergent cyber capabilities"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Nope</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2026 18:54:58 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49303080</link><dc:creator>slopinthebag</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49303080</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49303080</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by slopinthebag in "What garbage collection actually costs"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Depends on the game</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2026 02:48:48 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49294254</link><dc:creator>slopinthebag</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49294254</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49294254</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by slopinthebag in "DeepSeek API Pricing Update"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I haven’t noticed the Deepseek models being especially verbose. They’re also so cheap to run it doesn’t matter. These pricing changes are inconsequential since even 100 * ~0 is still a low number.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2026 02:48:21 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49294251</link><dc:creator>slopinthebag</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49294251</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49294251</guid></item></channel></rss>