<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: slunk</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=slunk</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 11:44:09 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=slunk" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by slunk in "Time to retire the CSV?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>>  That's the main reason why CSV absolutely sucks too [...]<p>Is it? I think you're absolutely right that naive points of view like the one you're responding to will lead to avoidable bugs, but I'm not so sure the problem is CSV so much as people who assume CSV is simple enough to parse or generate without using a library.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2021 16:11:02 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28223307</link><dc:creator>slunk</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28223307</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28223307</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by slunk in "Machine learning won't solve natural language understanding"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> It has nothing to do with what the model is being used for.<p>I may be misunderstanding this passage of the article, but I thought the author was claiming that machine learning (specifically training) was equivalent to compression, while language understanding is equivalent to decompression. Therefore, they can't be the same thing. Why does language understand have to be analogous to training an ML model rather than using an ML model for inference?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2021 11:38:08 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28127557</link><dc:creator>slunk</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28127557</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28127557</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by slunk in "Machine learning won't solve natural language understanding"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I was hoping there would be discussion of this point higher up in the thread, because I had essentially the same reaction as you while reading this passage. I'm no expert of machine learning, NLP, or linguistics, but this struck me as a pretty obvious flaw in the author's argument.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2021 11:30:23 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28127500</link><dc:creator>slunk</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28127500</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28127500</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by slunk in "A Lisp interpreter written in Lisp (2017)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I was also struggling to convey this point. I think you've hit the nail on the head.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2021 11:12:32 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28115234</link><dc:creator>slunk</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28115234</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28115234</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by slunk in "A Lisp interpreter written in Lisp (2017)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>You've gotten a couple responses making arguments that the atoms required for a language like lisp are fundamentally simpler than eval in Perl and that makes the difference... Fwiw, I don't find these arguments very compelling. It's not so much that they're entirely false, but the "most beautiful program ever written [sic]" that we're talking about here is "beautiful" precisely because it elides all these "simple" details. I do get the vague sense that it is essentially a more verbose `eval $1`.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2021 10:53:24 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28115071</link><dc:creator>slunk</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28115071</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28115071</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by slunk in "Show HN: Static.wiki – read-only Wikipedia using a 43GB SQLite file"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It's one thing if you have a source of revenue so justify your S3 costs. My interpretation of the parent commentator's concern is that this person has opened up a multi gigabyte S3 file publicly and sent lots of traffic its way (via hacker news) for what appears to be a passion project.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2021 22:54:44 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28013429</link><dc:creator>slunk</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28013429</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28013429</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by slunk in "Compiling Rust is NP-hard"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I don't think using an IDE to catch lots of stupid simple mistakes is bad. It's how I prefer to work.<p>> It looks really strange to me to observe other developers constantly compiling and running their code just to see if it works. It kinda looks as if they did not exactly understand what they are doing because if they did, they would be confident the implementation works.<p>Explain to me how this statement doesn't apply to your use of an IDE, but the other engineers you've observed don't understand what they're doing.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2021 20:47:07 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27777393</link><dc:creator>slunk</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27777393</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27777393</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by slunk in "Compiling Rust is NP-hard"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> So in a sense I am not strictly practicing my approach<p>Developing in an IDE that compiles almost continuously is about as far from the development philosophy you're advocating for here as one could get :P</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2021 16:13:49 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27773988</link><dc:creator>slunk</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27773988</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27773988</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by slunk in "Scots language Wikipedia is edited primarily by someone who doesn't know Scots"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Ah, my mistake. Thanks for the correction.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2020 20:58:37 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24276032</link><dc:creator>slunk</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24276032</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24276032</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by slunk in "Scots language Wikipedia is edited primarily by someone who doesn't know Scots"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>One can't help but wonder what kind of a person would tweet their "apology" for unintentionally defacing the entirety of Scots Wikipedia in more broken Scots. Seems... Insensitive, no?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2020 20:39:42 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24275827</link><dc:creator>slunk</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24275827</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24275827</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by slunk in "Nestur: NES Emulator in Rust"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Thanks for clarifying that for me!</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jan 2020 22:15:29 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21974066</link><dc:creator>slunk</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21974066</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21974066</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by slunk in "Nestur: NES Emulator in Rust"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Yup, fair enough.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jan 2020 22:08:45 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21974008</link><dc:creator>slunk</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21974008</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21974008</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by slunk in "Nestur: NES Emulator in Rust"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Without knowing enough about Rust to speak authoritatively... u8 can represent larger integers than i8 (no sign bit). Surely it's <i>not</i> completely safe.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jan 2020 22:02:00 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21973911</link><dc:creator>slunk</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21973911</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21973911</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by slunk in "Ask HN: What are your favorite YouTube channels to learn stuff?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Lots of good suggestions in here. One I haven't seen mentioned yet is NileRed for those interested in chemistry (<a href="https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCFhXFikryT4aFcLkLw2LBLA" rel="nofollow">https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCFhXFikryT4aFcLkLw2LBLA</a>).</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2019 22:47:42 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20387464</link><dc:creator>slunk</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20387464</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20387464</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by slunk in "Responsive Pixel Art"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Personally, I'm impressed by how the image dimensions were mapped to the image, not the fact that it can be done at all. There are plenty of boring and simple ways to map dimensions to an image. This was clever and well-implemented, imo. :)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2016 02:41:06 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11257127</link><dc:creator>slunk</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11257127</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11257127</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by slunk in "My Amazon Burnout Experience"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I stopped reading a few paragraphs in when all the author had managed to convey was how great they are. I also find it strange that someone so competent who wants to remain anonymous would reveal so much information about their situation in the company. What little I read seems like it would be enough to pinpoint them within the organization.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2015 19:43:20 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10087937</link><dc:creator>slunk</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10087937</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10087937</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by slunk in "Why Is Mayonnaise Loved and Hated So Deeply?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>"Hellman's doesn't resemble the real stuff"<p>That's a little exaggerated, don't you think? I'm no mayonnaise expert, but those lists of ingredients look pretty similar to me.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2015 20:14:04 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9482830</link><dc:creator>slunk</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9482830</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9482830</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by slunk in "Reduction in Garbage Collection Pause Time in Ruby 2.2"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Are you suggesting that ruby's design is more broken than PHP's?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2014 18:44:50 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8646259</link><dc:creator>slunk</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8646259</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8646259</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by slunk in "Show HN: Linkwok – Picking up where search engines left off"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Although I agree with others that the video leaves a bit to be desired, I thought I understood the point well enough and was looking forward to trying it out... Then I attempted to do just that and was instantly greeted with "INTERNAL ERROR<p>AN INTERNAL ERROR WAS ENCOUNTERED." :/</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2014 17:06:59 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8281723</link><dc:creator>slunk</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8281723</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8281723</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by slunk in "Coming Soon to Hacker News: Pending Comments"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Even if this system worked flawlessly as intended, doesn't it disincentivize getting to 1000+ karma? Unless I'm misunderstanding, your most active users don't seem to get any benefit (they see all the comments, good and bad, like everyone did before). Maybe if there was also an "unendorse" option... but then you've just implemented meta-(up|down)voting.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2014 04:44:12 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7447634</link><dc:creator>slunk</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7447634</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7447634</guid></item></channel></rss>