<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: smokedetector1</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=smokedetector1</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 23:22:30 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=smokedetector1" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by smokedetector1 in "Show HN: Pablo – a Chrome extension that copies UI from any website"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Really cool! Why are some things subtly different?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2026 18:43:35 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48239750</link><dc:creator>smokedetector1</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48239750</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48239750</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by smokedetector1 in "It is time to give up the dualism introduced by the debate on consciousness"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I think youve missed the point which is that your objections still imply an observer. Your rudeness is unnecessary and I wont be continuing this conversation. Have a good day.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 18:22:20 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48183462</link><dc:creator>smokedetector1</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48183462</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48183462</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by smokedetector1 in "It is time to give up the dualism introduced by the debate on consciousness"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Sorry my comment was unclear. My point is, the process of “making up a narrative” does seem to imply a subjective experience, doesnt it? My point is, the existence of the experiencer can’t be denied. Even if the experience itself is some kind of illusion, theres no coherent way to say that there is no entity having an experience. Every attempt to do so ends up implying the existence of an experiencer (the one having the illusion of experiencing)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 10:56:34 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48177853</link><dc:creator>smokedetector1</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48177853</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48177853</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by smokedetector1 in "It is time to give up the dualism introduced by the debate on consciousness"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Sorry, who make up an experience narrative?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 04:27:06 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48175573</link><dc:creator>smokedetector1</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48175573</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48175573</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by smokedetector1 in "It is time to give up the dualism introduced by the debate on consciousness"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> How do we know all this qualia isn't just some sort of illusion, that we ACTUALLY experience something?<p>I know what it means to have an experience that is illusory. For example, a mirage, or a drug-induced hallucination.<p>What doesn’t make sense to me is how it’s possible for it to be an illusion that anything is being experienced at all. An illusion is a type of experience, isn’t it? If the experience is illusory, then who/what is being deceived?<p>(This is basically just Descartes “I think therefore I am”)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 03:35:16 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48175285</link><dc:creator>smokedetector1</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48175285</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48175285</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by smokedetector1 in "We accidentally recreated old Facebook"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Not trying to be a hater, but I'm not sure if I would download an app just for this, and I'm almost 100% sure my non-tech friends and family wouldn't.<p>Is there a way to make this an add-on to another product that people are already on? Or a site that pulls data from another product?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 20:11:08 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48113806</link><dc:creator>smokedetector1</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48113806</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48113806</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by smokedetector1 in "Is my blue your blue? (2024)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>That's fascinating. I think this has to be biological. When I call something blue I don't think it has to do with just what I've learned but also that the color feels more like deep blue than it does like deep green.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 14:59:40 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47935570</link><dc:creator>smokedetector1</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47935570</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47935570</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by smokedetector1 in "Is my blue your blue? (2024)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The other week my wife and I were disagreeing over whether a house was green or blue. I was shocked when every passerby we asked agreed with her that it was green. I was absolutely 100% sure it was blue. Turns out according to this site, my boundary is greener than 95% of the population! Funny to see this proved out here!</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 21:21:25 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47927476</link><dc:creator>smokedetector1</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47927476</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47927476</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by smokedetector1 in "A. J. Ayer – ‘What I Saw When I Was Dead’ (1988)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I won't deny it takes giant leaps of faith. I think the questions are inherently unanswerable so any theory that's not in conflict with things we can know scientifically, and which doesn't lead to harming others, is as good as it can get. We can't really do better than thoughtful faith in this domain (and indeed I would (controversially) argue that the notion of inevitable scientific progress in this area is also a sort of faith, since there hasn't been any progress on the "hard problem" of consciousness..).<p>To your points, I would say that<p>> life is a kind of prison we endure before being liberated by death<p>Not exactly. More like a journey that we go through for mysterious reasons. Maybe so our soul can grow by learning lessons and having challenges that can only be when the stakes are real.<p>> "I" go away when I die<p>Not necessarily. Certain aspects of you, which are more contingent on brain traits, e.g. intelligence, some temperament. But the deepest self wouldn't disappear.<p>> All my struggles, battles, self-improvement, etc. will be meaningless<p>I see what you mean, but I wouldn't call it meaningless just because it wasn't "completely real." Also, I do believe that lessons learned here are learned for good. The soul is here to grow.<p>>  my kids will be a cruel trick I played that imprisoned other souls.<p>I don't really see how you got here. In this theory, your kids are also here for their own purpose. Relationships and love are still meaningful and real. Life is cruel and involves a great deal of suffering, but that doesn't mean that existence is inherently bad.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 22:16:34 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47855319</link><dc:creator>smokedetector1</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47855319</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47855319</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by smokedetector1 in "A. J. Ayer – ‘What I Saw When I Was Dead’ (1988)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Not answerable != immaterial/nonmeaningful.<p>I'd be happy to talk more as I am passionate about this. I think the idea that there is no soul is actually extremely dehumanizing, and involves someone essentially saying "I don't really exist" (even if they redefine "I exist" to mean something more Materialist, it is, in my view, still saying that). I'll ping you on bluesky.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 17:16:41 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47851662</link><dc:creator>smokedetector1</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47851662</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47851662</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by smokedetector1 in "A. J. Ayer – ‘What I Saw When I Was Dead’ (1988)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I don't mean to be insulting but, you don't seem to understand what the hard problem is. It is not "is the brain intimately linked with conscious experience?" I would agree we've made progress on that question. It is the harder question of "why is there conscious experience at all? Why does it feel the way it does?" I would argue no progress has been made on this whatsoever, and possibly can't be done.<p>You can try to claim that this question is meaningless, but that doesn't seem principled to me, not to mention that it completely ignores the fact that <i>gestures broadly</i> all this is happening.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 14:40:38 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47849476</link><dc:creator>smokedetector1</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47849476</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47849476</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by smokedetector1 in "A. J. Ayer – ‘What I Saw When I Was Dead’ (1988)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It's true that many things have yielded to science. And yet, what we discuss (the "hard problem of consciousness") hasn't. In my opinion, the burden is on you to prove that progress in other questions implies inevitable progress on an unrelated question that hasn't budged at all.<p>I said this in my other comment but, when you say the brain generates truly profound experiences, you beg the question (in the philosophical sense of the phrase). It's all in the word "experience." For in order for an experience to happen, some entity has to be experiencing. For there to be an illusion, there has to be an entity being deceived. And then how do you explain that entity? It can't be illusory experiences all the way down..<p>Any honest person has to see the connection between experience and the material brain. But I don't think it's honest to say it's obvious that experience is entirely material. The connection is deeply mysterious and may never be understood. I personally would rather accept that than claim that I don't really exist just so that everything can be explained.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 04:36:37 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47844569</link><dc:creator>smokedetector1</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47844569</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47844569</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by smokedetector1 in "A. J. Ayer – ‘What I Saw When I Was Dead’ (1988)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Here's something I don't understand about the argument that all conscious experience is some kind of illusion.<p>An illusion necessarily implies an entity experiencing the illusion. So what's that entity? It can't be illusions all the way down.<p>I think some people would rather claim that they themselves don't exist rather than admit that there might be something spiritual or unexplainable about existence. And I find that very strange.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 04:27:39 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47844517</link><dc:creator>smokedetector1</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47844517</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47844517</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by smokedetector1 in "A. J. Ayer – ‘What I Saw When I Was Dead’ (1988)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>You'd be hard pressed to find a principled neuroscientist who is as confident as you are that neuroscience can explain consciousness</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 04:25:04 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47844504</link><dc:creator>smokedetector1</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47844504</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47844504</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by smokedetector1 in "A. J. Ayer – ‘What I Saw When I Was Dead’ (1988)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The brain is like a sail thats catching the wind of the soul. The wind pushes and shapes the sail, and the sail limits the shape of the wind inside it. If the sail is in bad condition, it changes how the wind catches it, or prevents it from catching altogether.<p>So the brain is animated by the soul, and also limits and shapes its experience. When we're affected by anesthetic, or we're badly injured, or have a stroke, our conscious experience is impacted, while we're here on this plane. Eventually we leave this form and experience reality more truly. This could be one reason why NDEs happen - the brain is so badly damaged that it fails to even contain the soul and we approach a more death-like state.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 04:23:07 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47844492</link><dc:creator>smokedetector1</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47844492</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47844492</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by smokedetector1 in "A. J. Ayer – ‘What I Saw When I Was Dead’ (1988)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Safer why?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 04:18:09 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47844463</link><dc:creator>smokedetector1</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47844463</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47844463</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by smokedetector1 in "All 12 moonwalkers had "lunar hay fever" from dust smelling like gunpowder (2018)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This is a very unpleasant comment, consider deleting.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 19:19:23 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47809545</link><dc:creator>smokedetector1</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47809545</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47809545</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by smokedetector1 in "Boneyard: Generate pixel-perfect skeleton screens from your real DOM"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This is cool but I'm confused - it says it generates the bones at "build time" not at "runtime." But you're calling this headless bone generator while your app is running, right? That sounds like runtime.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 20:28:35 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47680933</link><dc:creator>smokedetector1</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47680933</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47680933</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by smokedetector1 in "Mystery jump in oil trading ahead of Trump post draws scrutiny"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I am not a fan of the democrats - I think they are corrupt and have in many cases given up on being democratic, totally beholden to their donors.<p>That said, Trump is unbelievably obviously corrupt and doing immense, immediate, and obvious damage to the country in pursuit of personal enrichment. If you dont see this you are willingly blind.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2026 19:04:32 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47507559</link><dc:creator>smokedetector1</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47507559</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47507559</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by smokedetector1 in "Mystery jump in oil trading ahead of Trump post draws scrutiny"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>this is such an unserious take.<p>Insider trading is prevalent on both sides. But the brazen daily market manipulation done by this administration is different. If you dont see that you are willingly blind</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2026 16:23:31 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47505098</link><dc:creator>smokedetector1</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47505098</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47505098</guid></item></channel></rss>