<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: snafferty</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=snafferty</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2026 17:28:48 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=snafferty" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by snafferty in "Amazon cuts 16k jobs"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Yes, and he is running for office on an anti-immigration platform, so I'd take anything he posts with a heap of salt.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2026 23:27:59 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46803271</link><dc:creator>snafferty</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46803271</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46803271</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by snafferty in "Mozilla to shut down Pocket and Fakespot"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>That seems pretty clear to me—many people were using it at one point, but now few are, so it's not worth maintaining.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2025 23:47:48 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44068380</link><dc:creator>snafferty</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44068380</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44068380</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by snafferty in "ArkType: Ergonomic TS validator 100x faster than Zod"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Between this and node adding the --experimental-strip-types option which would otherwise allow people to skip compilation, I'm not sure I would choose Typia right now. I'm sure it's a great library, but these don't bode well for its future.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2025 11:38:46 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43672023</link><dc:creator>snafferty</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43672023</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43672023</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by snafferty in "Oh Shit, Git?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This is a workflow I’ve never seen on any team or project I’ve worked on. Another commenter already mentioned the remote branch for everything preference, but usage of tags is especially interesting to me. I think that’s how most people use branches, and tags tend to be more permanent. What do you do when you come back to the commit with the tag, cherry pick it over and delete the tag? It sounds like an overly complicated process compared to having a branch and rebasing onto the current branch when you finally go to make the change for real.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2025 00:49:12 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42732829</link><dc:creator>snafferty</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42732829</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42732829</guid></item></channel></rss>