<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: soblemprolver</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=soblemprolver</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2026 20:25:41 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=soblemprolver" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by soblemprolver in "Our position on open-weights models"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I am familiar, yet used this comment to confirm my initial assumption.<p>Abbreviations carry unnecessary cost on the side of the readers. There is always the chance that there is another shorthand for something else that is important and so there is a need to double check interpretations.<p>So thanks for the comment and no, a 101 wouldn't even help with this problem.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2026 10:38:24 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49081911</link><dc:creator>soblemprolver</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49081911</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49081911</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by soblemprolver in "Codex scraped the ICM website and discovered 2026 Fields Medal winner list"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>URL paths over https wouldn't be transparent to the ISP though, would they?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2026 13:04:21 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48906228</link><dc:creator>soblemprolver</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48906228</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48906228</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by soblemprolver in "WhatsApp's "End-to-End Encryption" Is the Biggest Lie in Tech History"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The article opens with a statement by Telegram co-founder Pavel Durov who claims that WhatsApp shared Messages with third parties while Telegram "never did and never will" do that.<p>Now, Telegram doesn't use End-to-End encryption by default at all, does it? What I mean is: The message is encrypted on the sender's device and can only be decrypted on that and the receiver's device.<p>Telegram uses transport layer encryption that leaves all messages exposed to the servers an their admins. Last I checked, there was a E2E feature but every room I opened would just stop working after a while and my contacts were very confused about that. Large rooms weren't possible.<p>I have no idea what Meta/WhatsApp may or may not be doing but this article opens with Telegram and doesn't pick that up anymore. Makes it feel like a telegram ad.<p>The rest of the article may be fine but it's very lengthy and goes somewhere to show that dispite using the Signal protocol, WhatsApp cloud backups can be decrypted, I think. The Telegram ad was too irritating to give the article a fair chance, to be honest.<p>XMPP, Matrix and Signal are there, too.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2026 13:45:13 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48630056</link><dc:creator>soblemprolver</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48630056</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48630056</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by soblemprolver in "Hand Drawn QR Codes (2025)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I found this page very helpful in understanding each step of the QR code creation process. I can't say I recall it all but it would be possible to turn this into a small booklet, I guess.<p><a href="https://typefully.com/DanHollick/qr-codes-T7tLlNi" rel="nofollow">https://typefully.com/DanHollick/qr-codes-T7tLlNi</a><p>Here's a HN discussion from 2022 about it.<p><a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32837565">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32837565</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 07:55:09 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48019327</link><dc:creator>soblemprolver</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48019327</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48019327</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by soblemprolver in "Flipdiscs"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It is so sad to see both this and the title "It's ok to abandon your side project" on the front page while I have three flipdisc displays sitting in the basement without the time and equipment to get them up and running.<p>No, it's not ok to abandon those flipdisc displays! :(<p>Admittedly I read neither of the articles. But who doesn't sometimes get caught up in the conincidence of titles on here may vote me down :D</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 09:06:23 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47919305</link><dc:creator>soblemprolver</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47919305</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47919305</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by soblemprolver in "Backblaze has stopped backing up your data"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>F9 doesn't seem to do anything for me on Linux... Neither on the posted page nor on HN.<p>What is it supposed to do?<p>There is no mention of F9 on this support page either:<p><a href="https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/keyboard-shortcuts-perform-firefox-tasks-quickly" rel="nofollow">https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/keyboard-shortcuts-perf...</a><p>Am I missing something?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 10:31:35 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47763740</link><dc:creator>soblemprolver</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47763740</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47763740</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by soblemprolver in "Are We Idiocracy Yet?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I couldn't finish "Idiocracy" because the underlying eugenics nonsense made me angry enough not to enjoy the comedy anymore.<p>It made me angry because makes the point that natural selection has become ineffective on humans and thus intelligence declines unironically. There is no joke in that - all jokes build upon the assumption of this being true.<p>If it were true, then decline wouldn't have begun in the 19th or 20th century but around the time that property and currencies emerged.<p>But there is no need to disproof this because there is no evidence that it has any truth to it.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 11:59:51 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47673859</link><dc:creator>soblemprolver</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47673859</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47673859</guid></item></channel></rss>