https://www.newsonhealth.co.uk/

over research from Harvard.

One, maybe two non-research docs or... a team of research docs.

Also, automation and pride can go hand in hand. Pride doesn't mean "make it by hand," that would be silly.

This is to teach a lesson because you cannot prosecute all thieves.

Yale Law Journal actually writes about this, the goal is to deter crime because in most cases damages cannot be recovered or the criminal will never be caught in the first place.

Personally, I have only used AI to write actual code when it is for Bash and Python scripts that are self contained. In my case self contained means they are interfaced to via command line so their boundaries are very well defined.

I have never returned to look at any of the code.

I would never use it to generate domain code for my codebase because then I'd have to code review it anyways. I mean, if I have an agentic AI solving an issue and generating a PR, great, I can review that and give it feedback on how to change the code before its accepted.

Unless I can either throw the code away or review it for maintainability rather than correctness then I have no need for a tool that write my code for me.

Oh, unless the AI can be the product owner and understand the financial ramifications of not doing its job correctly but I would be worried that the solution is to not have a product by reducing the users to ash.

It's more likely the reason some of these folks aren't employed.

Lowering wages doesn't create anything except depravity on the part of employers.

Before the ACA it simply was not a choice to be an independent professional and have health insurance.

If people could understand why it is unacceptable to force independent professionals and entrepreneurs to give up healthcare they would see the ACA was necessary in whatever form it could be passed.

The emphasis is on running the correct software. If you have to input cryptographic data every time you boot that's okay because you're offline and should be in a secure room (no internet connected devices).

But yeah, malware attack is still possible if you don't have a secure chain and that's a long one.

The internet is adversarial, a cold wallet should only be reachable by a wrench attack.

If you believe amusement is a disservice to the community then I believe many others disagree.

edit: For clarity, the "since inception" part is an absurd setup for the, equally absurd, "well funded open source" part.

It'll be _perfect_.

Competition solves everything.

Who gets to mate with who has been answered by competition our entire existence.

Striving for non-violent, yet fair, competition is what advancing the world is about.

Future world leader advisor.

Ahem, I hope not.

Now I'm ruined, again.

I opened several laptops with spudger tools. Now I can open random items I didn't watch videos for just because I have an idea of how it _might_ be assembled.

I know how a team is organized, I knew the multiplayer feature was tacked on (probably by interns), I know about network code edge cases, bada-bing bada-boom I can trigger a bug and understand why it happens without ever seeing their code.

Or sitting in a theater and just noticing the lighting setup and transitions rather than the performance itself.

I've made similar improvements (40x speedup, 8x reduction in RAM footprint) and had been shown the door. This was for software that was a bit over 30 years old too so it was a bit involved.

The team winning does not help a narcissist feel better. You'd be better off getting nothing done while stroking their ego daily.

It's a bit of a pain. They limited your choices and now the limited choices are facing legal scrutiny.

The Japanese lawyer representing Mt. GOX customers is also collecting fees this entire time from the pool of customer funds.