<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: solongso</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=solongso</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 04:28:50 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=solongso" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by solongso in "Stack Overflow is almost dead"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Damaging a contributor's reputation because they didn't initially conform to your standard is vandalism. Why don't you make your suggestion for improvement and let the poster bring the post into compliance? If that's what you want, do you think that by damaging my reputation you are motivating me toward compliance with your standards? No, you're motivating me to stop contributing.<p>OK. I concede the point. Maybe it's not glee. Maybe it's just a misplaced conviction that punishment is the best way to motivate the behavior you are seeking.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2025 03:12:37 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44018734</link><dc:creator>solongso</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44018734</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44018734</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by solongso in "Stack Overflow is almost dead"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It's absolutely true. I've had my posts edited to remove phrases like "thanks for any advice which you can provide". I've had people leave comments and ding my reputation because I've expressed gratitude. Maybe you don't think eliminating gratitude from basic communications qualifies as "dehumanizing". OK, let's agree to disagree. (BTW - to the guy who called me a "troll". If you can't disagree with a fellow of your species, without branding them a troll, you've just made my point. Thank you.)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2025 03:06:08 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44018706</link><dc:creator>solongso</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44018706</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44018706</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by solongso in "Stack Overflow is almost dead"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>If that's you're goal, you're going about it the wrong way. Thank you for introducing yourself and your fellow answerers. Let me introduce myself and my fellow questioners. I have a deadline and a problem. I've already spent 5 hours researching why what should work - according the the documentation and the conventional advice - doesn't. I've searched many sources, including SO. I've seen some articles which might have answered my problem. Tried the suggestions, but no joy. So now I'm six hour in, and my deadline is looming. It's probably around 1:00am. Between 1 and 2 I type up my problem and submit it to SO. I'm hopeful that perhaps in the morning someone who has successfully worked through my problem will have contributed a solution.<p>9:00am, I check SO. My reputation has decreased by 8 points, a number of self-styled enforcers have left negative comments comparing my issue to other issues which bear a superficial similarity to my posting, and my posting has been closed.<p>I'm not the most powerful contributor but over several years I've achieved upwards of 1,000 points. So I am by no means a nudnick. I've posted some good ones and I've helped some of my peers along the way. But recently, my experience has devolved to the point where the experience I describe above is the rule, rather than the exception. And when I tried to have the discussion we are having now, on the stack overflow meta site, your fellow enforcers shut down the discussion and deleted the posting. So I left. And now we can have the conversation here.<p>You can have all the justifications in the world for your approach, and you don't need to keep the audience you don't want. But if those of us voicing our displeasure here, are not simply a few malcontents, but a significant chunk of your former user base, you might want to look inward, and at the same time ask with a certain measure of humility - what are we doing wrong and how can we improve?<p>For starters, if you want a questioner to improve their posting or you have questions about why they posted, is it necessary to start off by immediately deducting from the poster's reputation? Ask your question, make your point, give the poster the opportunity to remediate or show you why you're the one who's off base (did you ever consider that possibility?) before decreasing someone's reputation.<p>Stop dehumanizing your knowledge base. Your resistance to AI is somewhat ironic, given all the effort you've devoted toward eliminating all courtesy and gratitude from your knowledge base. Do you want humans communicating on your platform? Let them. Perhaps after a question has been asked, answered, let the posting remain dormant for 30 days and then have some AI process go ahead and scrub the posting. Don't ding people for saying please and thank you and expect them to like you for it.<p>Just for starters. For now, I'm out of there. Change your game, maybe I'll be back one day.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2025 02:55:56 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44018659</link><dc:creator>solongso</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44018659</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44018659</guid></item></channel></rss>