Linux distributions got this right: Offer both HTTP and Torrents. Let the user decide.

Banning any form of legal, libre software, shows that you are not floss friendly and I do not want to host my code with organizations like yours. I dropped sourcehut when they banned cryptocurrency software and today I drop you.

Looks like I'm going back to self-hosting and accepting patches via email.

I found out about this by accident when I was brushing up on PrimeVue and noticed that they now require you to specify a license key when creating the Vue app.

Any recommendations for developers who pull VUE from a CDN and don't go through a build step? NuxtUI doesn't seem to support this use case.

Source 1: https://primeui.dev/nextchapter

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48860682

Points: 3

# Comments: 2

If the US doesn't reverse course soon, I think we'll start seeing large-scale closure of international markets to US companies very soon. Even with US retaliation, there is no other option.

If the US continues to limit advanced AI to it's own domestic companies, US companies will have a large unfair advantage over foreign competitors who will no longer able to compete.

Wouldn't it then make sense for governments around the world to start banning or tariffing US products and services to protect their industries?

1: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48696965

If US companies have a large unfair advantage such that domestic competitors are no longer able to compete, then wouldn't it make sense for governments around the world to ban or tariff US products and services?

If I was responsible for national economic policy, I would place this at the top of my non-emergency agenda. The world needs to act quick before their industries fail.

Legally, model output cannot be protected by IP laws whether domestic or international. The most they can hope for is civil relief which is a stretch given the literally illicit methods they used to train their models.

Ahtoropic got treated the same way it has been treating everyone else. This is the bed they made and now they, too, have to sleep in it.

That's not to say that 30% isn't a crime against humanity. About 1.5 million children were murdered during the Holocaust (1.5M of 6M+ deaths). Israel murders more children than adults when compared to the Nazis.

Pity. Genuine pity. Guess I'll continue using my 5 year-old out-of-support device until someone decides to make a decent GrapheneOS-compatible tablet with stylus pen support. If it breaks, I'll just go back to notebooks.

Iran and other tyrannical governments can easily set up their own CAs and force their citizens to use them. Iran likely already has this infra in place. This ban does nothing but highlights LE as the liability it is. The decades-old certificate authority scheme is no longer fit for purpose and needs to go.

If you're a web developer, consider offering your site through public key-addressable networks. Reticulum and Tor are good options that work today.

Whether this is true or not, it's pretty safe to assume anything based on their stuff is not for me.

Their search engine isn't the best but none of the search engines I use are, not even Google.

So to me, they've already succeeded. Can you elaborate on the issues that make you think they haven't?

[1]: https://www.zdnet.com/article/brave-deemed-most-private-brow...

I've been using Ddg and Brave for general search and Yandex for deep-ocean expeditions (of the jack sparrow variety) and topics that US tech giants censor. I am looking for good Chinese search engine so that I can search things that Yandex censors or when Yandex's bot detection goes crazy (I get blocked with infinite captcha about 25% of the time).

The only thing Google remains good at is local search. If I want to buy something locally, nothing else comes close.

It's not about what people believe, but what they are willing to publicly push back against. If such a law was proposed today, I bet it would pass because the only discussions around it would be whether the data can be kept safe and what punishments to dole out if the car owner access this data. Arguments about privacy will be waved away or dismissed without debate.

In fact, let's make a pointless bet: I bet my imaginary internet reputation that the US or EU will pass a law within the next 10 years that requires the continuous recording and collection of data that not only includes GPS, but also face and audio data whenever a car is in motion. This law will impose severe punishments on any owner that accesses this data or deletes it.

I desperately fear for my family and want things to improve, but we are going to lose this battle.

It's the the Emperor's New Clothes in real life but for morals. No amount of Rossmanning is going to help society walk back its collective hypocrisy.

I think _your_ impression of people outside tech circles is as HN-centric as it gets :)