<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: sopooneo</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=sopooneo</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2026 14:44:47 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=sopooneo" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by sopooneo in "“Captain Gains” on Capitol Hill"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I fully agree all your logic. But then I see a counter of "public sentiment" where I bet most citizens would be outraged by million dollar salaries.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2025 18:55:14 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46175673</link><dc:creator>sopooneo</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46175673</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46175673</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by sopooneo in "Progressive JSON"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I've heard two side the the Protobuf/streaming idea. On my first introduction, it seemed you could. But later reading leads me to believe it is only <i>almost</i> streamable: <a href="https://belkadan.com/blog/2023/12/Protobuf-Is-Almost-Streamable/" rel="nofollow">https://belkadan.com/blog/2023/12/Protobuf-Is-Almost-Streama...</a>.<p>* I do acknowledge you qualified the question with "better".</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2025 02:33:31 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44148296</link><dc:creator>sopooneo</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44148296</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44148296</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by sopooneo in "“The Traitors”, a reality TV show, offers a useful economics lesson"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> Some see a university education as an example of this: it costs cleverer and more conscientious types less to get a degree than stupider and lazier ones, allowing employers to distinguish between the two.<p>Wait, how? If two people both have a degree, how does that help distinguish who is stupid?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 19 Jan 2025 22:36:45 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42762773</link><dc:creator>sopooneo</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42762773</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42762773</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by sopooneo in "What it's like working for American companies as an Australian"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Could it be kinder, at times, to play to the cultural norm? If people have been raised to say "sir" to their boss, could asking them to do otherwise cause <i>them</i> discomfort without benefit?<p>I have struggled with this myself, as I don't believe work hierarchy should convey any fundamental difference between people, and we are best off treating each other as equals.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 12 Jan 2025 18:55:53 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42675829</link><dc:creator>sopooneo</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42675829</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42675829</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by sopooneo in "What it's like working for American companies as an Australian"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>As an American from a region with an atypically dry and reserved culture, the Australia attitude sounds nice.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 12 Jan 2025 18:39:42 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42675697</link><dc:creator>sopooneo</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42675697</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42675697</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by sopooneo in "Historically, 4NF explanations are needlessly confusing"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I was about to say I thought you might be mistaken because you can always use some variant of "group concat" to get sets of fields to show in comma seperated form...<p>But then I realized even with that, I couldn't get the output under discussion without subqueries. And I don't consider that a win for me.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2024 00:05:09 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42361882</link><dc:creator>sopooneo</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42361882</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42361882</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by sopooneo in "The Art of Finishing"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Agreed completely. Sometimes I've worked hard to put the finishing touches on side projects to make them usable by others and have been pleasantly surprised by the interest. But in <i>most cases</i>, even when I finish, almost no one cares.<p>And while <i>finishing</i> is an important lesson early on, just so you know how hard that "last 20%" is, it's grueling and not typically very informative or unique after that first couple times.<p>So I'm now squarely in the camp of do what I want and finish what I want on the side, with no guilt. If I enjoy the journey I call it good. Finishing is for the day job.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 02 Sep 2024 21:41:46 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41429025</link><dc:creator>sopooneo</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41429025</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41429025</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by sopooneo in "The physics of airplane flight"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Crud I think you're right. I had it in my head that in steady flight, the plane had zero change in momentum, whereas, the air, collectively, gained net downward momentum. So to balance it all out, the <i>earth</i> must be gaining upward momentum (though of course spread over such an enormous mass as to make the velocity term imperceptible.)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 06 Jul 2024 02:20:50 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40887748</link><dc:creator>sopooneo</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40887748</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40887748</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by sopooneo in "Put the DVD logo in the corner (2023)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>You clearly know more about this than me, because I'm currently Googling to understand what "diametrical corners" are. But in a simple implementation, wouldn't the x and y velocities both be reversed at once with a corner hit, both side and top/bottom collisions having been detected "at once" in the same part of the code between updating positions? And then the logo would just bounce out exactly the way it came in?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 05 Jul 2024 22:24:41 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40886594</link><dc:creator>sopooneo</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40886594</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40886594</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by sopooneo in "The physics of airplane flight"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>One other weird thing needed if you want your momentum numbers to balance: every plane in the sky is <i>pulling the earth up towards it</i> ever so slightly.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2024 23:15:30 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40851853</link><dc:creator>sopooneo</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40851853</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40851853</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by sopooneo in "The physics of airplane flight"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Honest question: if wing's cross section has a big curve in front, how do determine which point exactly constitutes the "leading edge"?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2024 23:08:26 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40851810</link><dc:creator>sopooneo</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40851810</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40851810</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by sopooneo in "Information Security: "We Can Do It, We Just Choose Not To""]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Exactly. At $500 or $1000 per record, PII starts to look highly radioactive. Companies would be avoiding it's collection with a passion. And those that had to hold it would be compelled to do so less stupidly.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 15 Jun 2024 12:59:39 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40689527</link><dc:creator>sopooneo</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40689527</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40689527</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by sopooneo in "Information Security: "We Can Do It, We Just Choose Not To""]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Completely agree on this. A company-killing level of fine, based on number or records exposed, is appropriate. Then the insurance companies would not ensure companies unless they passed stringent audits around best practice and data hygiene.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 15 Jun 2024 12:55:53 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40689501</link><dc:creator>sopooneo</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40689501</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40689501</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by sopooneo in "Algorithms Interviews: Theory vs. Practice (2020)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I would argue that, in practice, they are not completely separate. Too much abstraction makes it hard to tell what the underlying algorithm is. And even if you can figure that out, makes it hard to optimize.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2024 00:06:38 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40569221</link><dc:creator>sopooneo</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40569221</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40569221</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by sopooneo in "Show HN: Online database diagram editor"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Got it, and that makes sense. Thank you. I couldn't even figure out why I was confused, but then looking at the interface, I think I may have been mixing up the order fields are noted, vs cardinality.<p><a href="https://ibb.co/gWS558v" rel="nofollow">https://ibb.co/gWS558v</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2024 04:38:25 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39998429</link><dc:creator>sopooneo</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39998429</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39998429</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by sopooneo in "Show HN: Online database diagram editor"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Fantastic. I was literally <i>just</i> looking for something like this. I'm using it now.<p>One thing that may be me getting my brain reversed, but when you set the "cardinality" of a relationship the "1" and "n" markings on the connecting line seem to be reversed?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 07 Apr 2024 03:35:34 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39957981</link><dc:creator>sopooneo</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39957981</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39957981</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by sopooneo in "Sam Bankman-Fried sentenced to 25 years in prison"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>No dog in this race either way, but what is Michael Lewis meant to have done? Is it just that people feel hist treatment of SBF in <i>Going Infinite</i> was too lenient?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2024 16:43:48 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39854065</link><dc:creator>sopooneo</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39854065</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39854065</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by sopooneo in "Ask HN: What's your "it's not stupid if it works" story?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I'm a Docker amateur, so this will be a dumb question, but if you were using that technique after every run line in a DockerFile, wouldn't they be <i>the same</i> every time they're run? Like, it's random, but it's the same random values stored in the file, so wouldn't the lines get cached? Or did you adjust the DockerFile each time?<p>Or am I completely missunderstanding?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 23 Dec 2023 02:47:46 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38741182</link><dc:creator>sopooneo</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38741182</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38741182</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by sopooneo in "You don't need JavaScript for that"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Total aside: but related to ambiguous true/false designation: A lot of times when people write articles like "Ten Myths About NodeJS", it is unclear in each of the numbered items whether the stance initially described is the <i>incorrect</i> myth, or the <i>correct</i> view as proposed by the author. To make it worse, some writers vary the structure between items!</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2023 15:07:51 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38499083</link><dc:creator>sopooneo</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38499083</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38499083</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by sopooneo in "My $500M Mars rover mistake"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>That is my reading too. But why was the multimeter connecting up telemetry? That seems very strange to me.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2023 04:45:37 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38455669</link><dc:creator>sopooneo</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38455669</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38455669</guid></item></channel></rss>