<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: spark_chicken</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=spark_chicken</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2026 08:28:14 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=spark_chicken" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[Apple's Open Source Roots]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://thenewstack.io/apples-open-source-roots-the-bsd-heritage-behind-macos-and-ios/">https://thenewstack.io/apples-open-source-roots-the-bsd-heritage-behind-macos-and-ios/</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40907471">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40907471</a></p>
<p>Points: 3</p>
<p># Comments: 0</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2024 17:40:15 +0000</pubDate><link>https://thenewstack.io/apples-open-source-roots-the-bsd-heritage-behind-macos-and-ios/</link><dc:creator>spark_chicken</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40907471</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40907471</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Ask HN: Is it still meaningful learning deep learning for GPU tight lab?]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Hi,<p>These days when I do literature reviews for the trending research, I find that most of the useful models need insane amount of GPU to train. As a student in a small lab, we are lack of GPU power. Is it still meaningful if I stay in this lab to learn deep learning??? I felt like all my work is like a toy...feeling lost, any advice?</p>
<hr>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40898834">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40898834</a></p>
<p>Points: 4</p>
<p># Comments: 2</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 07 Jul 2024 17:00:57 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40898834</link><dc:creator>spark_chicken</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40898834</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40898834</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Which is the best AI chip now?]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://www.pcquest.com/tech-trends/amd-ryzen-300-vs-intel-lunar-lake-vs-qualcomm-snapdragon-x-elite-whos-leading-ai-chip-race-4772911">https://www.pcquest.com/tech-trends/amd-ryzen-300-vs-intel-lunar-lake-vs-qualcomm-snapdragon-x-elite-whos-leading-ai-chip-race-4772911</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40823940">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40823940</a></p>
<p>Points: 4</p>
<p># Comments: 0</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2024 19:02:09 +0000</pubDate><link>https://www.pcquest.com/tech-trends/amd-ryzen-300-vs-intel-lunar-lake-vs-qualcomm-snapdragon-x-elite-whos-leading-ai-chip-race-4772911</link><dc:creator>spark_chicken</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40823940</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40823940</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by spark_chicken in "Show HN: Voice bots with 500ms response times"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>i have tried it. it is really fast!
I know making a real-time voice bot is not easy with this low latency.
which LLM did you use? how large LLM to make the conversation efficient?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2024 14:21:25 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40810835</link><dc:creator>spark_chicken</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40810835</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40810835</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by spark_chicken in "One Million Checkboxes"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It kept me busy for several mins. omg lmao. i met the server crashing</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2024 14:04:35 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40810683</link><dc:creator>spark_chicken</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40810683</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40810683</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by spark_chicken in "Language is primarily a tool for communication rather than thought [pdf]"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This article raises an interesting point, but I think it may oversimplify the relationship between language and thinking. While the authors provide some convincing arguments, we should not ignore the role of language in internal thought processes.<p>Many people, including myself, often organize and sort out their thoughts through internal dialogue. This "self-communication" may not be external communication in the traditional sense, but it does help us structure and refine ideas. Language provides a way to structure our thoughts, allowing us to examine our ideas more clearly.<p>In addition, certain complex abstract concepts may be difficult to form without language. While basic cognitive processes may not rely on language, high-level thinking - especially in fields such as philosophy and science - is often closely linked to language.<p>I agree that language is a powerful communication tool, but I think it is also a thinking tool. Perhaps it is more accurate to say that language serves both communication and thinking, and the two are not mutually exclusive.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2024 13:58:59 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40810622</link><dc:creator>spark_chicken</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40810622</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40810622</guid></item></channel></rss>