<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: sriramyadavalli</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=sriramyadavalli</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2026 03:38:50 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=sriramyadavalli" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[Show HN: A messaging app for trading favors]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://sites.google.com/site/karmamessaging/">https://sites.google.com/site/karmamessaging/</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8484538">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8484538</a></p>
<p>Points: 4</p>
<p># Comments: 0</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2014 21:13:44 +0000</pubDate><link>https://sites.google.com/site/karmamessaging/</link><dc:creator>sriramyadavalli</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8484538</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8484538</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by sriramyadavalli in "How Twitter Cards Work (technical)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>If Twitter could use common standard like microdata (proposed by w3c), it would probably be a better approach.<p>The big problem with Twitter product cards is the lack of real time information (ie the data shown to user is crawler dependent).  So, e-commerce vendors with dynamic pricing needs (like hotels, airlines) wont use it much.  E-Commerce vendors (like Etsy) where users are little less price sensitive have a better shot at using these cards.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2014 18:58:45 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8174464</link><dc:creator>sriramyadavalli</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8174464</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8174464</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by sriramyadavalli in "Omnilinks, AppLinks and the State of Mobile Deeplinking"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>IMHO, the hard part in deep linking is connecting existing web app content w/ views inside the mobile app.  But, not sure if that can be delivered as a SaaS/proxy service + SDK (since it is too specific to each site).</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2014 19:39:57 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7745832</link><dc:creator>sriramyadavalli</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7745832</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7745832</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by sriramyadavalli in "Ask HN: Listen to HN articles as radio."]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I am actually developing a service that is a text to speech solution for any app.  So, while you travel to work you can listen to ur email/calendar/other data.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2014 00:19:23 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7707954</link><dc:creator>sriramyadavalli</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7707954</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7707954</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by sriramyadavalli in "Omnilinks, AppLinks and the State of Mobile Deeplinking"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>May be I am missing something.  Isnt Omnilink just detecting the user agent (eg Google/Twitter crawler) and presenting the right content to the crawler?  Is there something else to this solution?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2014 17:57:10 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7687119</link><dc:creator>sriramyadavalli</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7687119</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7687119</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by sriramyadavalli in "Client-side Java is dead (2005)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Looking at all the client side Android development,  seems like the tide has changed</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2014 22:34:53 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7643526</link><dc:creator>sriramyadavalli</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7643526</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7643526</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by sriramyadavalli in "The Decline of the Mobile Web"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The key issue is that mobile apps tend to be task oriented.  A lot of web companies (like FB) are not transitioning into app studios by breaking down a monolithic site into set of mobile apps that deliver a single feature/accomplish a single task.<p>If the open web were to be redefined along those lines, I dont see why users wont use that.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2014 20:26:16 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7549231</link><dc:creator>sriramyadavalli</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7549231</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7549231</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Ask HN: Enable "car mode" for your mobile app]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I am building a mobile SDK/SaaS service that allows developers to easily integrate "car mode" into their app.  By using the SDK, a button would show up in the app and the user will be able to launch an "audio/voice interaction mode" of the app.<p>We are working with car manufacturers to make the SDK dead simple.  I wanted to know if anyone would be interested in using this.  It would be great to hear feedback on the idea.</p>
<hr>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7100999">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7100999</a></p>
<p>Points: 1</p>
<p># Comments: 0</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 22 Jan 2014 05:50:20 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7100999</link><dc:creator>sriramyadavalli</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7100999</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7100999</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by sriramyadavalli in "Google’s iron grip on Android: Controlling open source by any means necessary"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Nothing wrong with what Google is doing.  Google is essentially a consumer (and enterprise) cloud services company that is looking to commoditize (read open source/sell at cost) all other parts of the stack. That includes open-sourcing Chrome/Android, selling Chromecast/Google Fiber at cost.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 21 Oct 2013 06:21:25 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6583688</link><dc:creator>sriramyadavalli</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6583688</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6583688</guid></item></channel></rss>