This isn't law and order and that's not how civil litigation works.

Also Apple could have filed the litigation right before the IPO and after a IPO announcement. OpenAI doesn't get to decide when Apple sues them.

So they are in fact literally putting copyrighted data into the model weights and reselling it.

Edited: I was wrong.

This has almost nothing to do with your reply.

It's arty but there's no doubt it's done that way in part due to horniness.

Whatever narrative you've invented of Shirow changing over time is a stretch.

But if we are the main Mario franchise games are the "Super Mario" games. Donkey Kong is not part of the "Super Mario" series and his "Mario" is not "Super" .

I'm still waiting for any evidence of LLM economic impact in the real world.

I suppose if it says something like "Eat more broccoli" and the suggestion works you can assume the answer is accurate.

But for me it's more likely to say "maybe you have xxxx" and I would still need to see a specialist to do tests like colonoscopies to know?

I suffer from one condition with no cure and little literature and every once in a while I've seen on a related subreddit I no longer read "I'm using AI you guys and this AI SLOP will surely help!!!"

Instead of honestly saying "I think you are wrong because..." they passive aggressively pretends they are "just asking questions."

Of course on non controversial topics a question is likely to just be a question.