It's easy to port a codebase (at least, if you have automated tests), but once you've done that, do you

- Implement features in the old code and port again?

- Implement them in the new, unfamiliar codebase?

- Just write a Jira ticket and let the agent YOLO it?

By the time you add cloud-storage space integration (SharePoint), live collaborative editing, support hotline, support for 30 year old macros, and Active directory user integration, you'll be charging the same per seat.

But hey, proof me wrong please. Code it.

Interesting take. Last I checked, those datacenters hosted software that targeted a children's school.

But low-effort spam will always dominate, that's just the nature of it. You will always receive 10 times more messages that were only 1/10th of the work on the other side. How could it ever be otherwise?

AI gets cheaper, people use it everywhere. Google searches, for example. Now we want to crack math problems and spend weeks with unreleased models.

If you used GPT-2, it'd be incredibly cheap. You basically can't use it for anything and it's simple to serve.

It's truly amazing. It integrated with my ten year old Alienware keyboard and made the lighting ice blue during a snow storm.

I mean, sure you can blame Google Maps, but it wasn't my choice to consult Google Maps.

I think noticeable here is how hard it is to steer this trash model even when fed already correct information.

I asked "why closed?" and it corrected me to "it's open" with wrong information. Then it got the current time wrong.

https://share.gemini.google/r9T9GPuC0Cjc

> Gives agent email access

> Agent emails humans

We've got a mystery on our hands, boys!

Does the author think "product customers" hand you a tidy list of requirements the stupid programmer automatons just have to translate into code? Obviously not. Customers also don't know what they want, or could want. Famously, they claim to want faster horses.

Then the author goes on to list "crash led discovery", as if this was so different from prioritizing bugs in prod. Or, If you have no idea, just improving efficiency. Or talking to customers, err, users.

All of this is true and none of this is any different from any of the other software, just translated into other lingo.

https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bodenampel

(short for Bodenampel, or "ground traffic light" to help "smartphone zombies" cross the street)

I just wish they also had gotten cool designs.

What I gleam from TV shows is: The wife invited people over to brag about her husband's recent promotion or her children's achievements. Once over, they gossiped about a perceived fault in the other family (did you see the son's long hair? I heard he smokes weed!

Sounds like a suburban nightmare. There surely are other socializing events that were more beneficial; like a weekly bowling club meeting.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_Tanks

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R8yvSl9j9yU

The intelligence is there and so is the physical incarnation.

Google's models fold proteins better than humans and Covid might have been engineered and inadvertently escaped from a lab.

But when CEOs warn of that, they're dismissed as scare mongers. Why? Are only powerless internet commentators allowed to be fearful?