<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: sterlind</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=sterlind</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 12:12:59 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=sterlind" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by sterlind in "Ensuring a National Policy Framework for Artificial Intelligence"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I think the Administration is likely to get its toys taken away soon.<p>the Major Questions Doctrine, the end of <i>Chevron</i> deference, the mandate for Article III courts from <i>Jarkesy</i>, have been building towards this for a while. the capstone in this program of weakening the administrative state, overturning <i>Humphrey's Executor</i> when <i>Trump v. Slaughter</i> is decided, will likely revive the Intelligible Principle Doctrine, as Justice Gorsuch has hinted. the same trend is apparent in the IEEPA tariffs case, where non-delegation got a lot of airtime.<p>EOs lose a lot of their punch when the Executive's delegated rulemaking and adjudication powers are returned back to their rightful owners in the other two branches.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2025 00:25:58 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46250719</link><dc:creator>sterlind</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46250719</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46250719</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by sterlind in "Ensuring a National Policy Framework for Artificial Intelligence"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>the Task Force can try to challenge state AI laws. they can file whatever lawsuits they want. they will probably lose most of their suits, because there's very little ground for challenging state AI regulations.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2025 00:19:10 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46250670</link><dc:creator>sterlind</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46250670</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46250670</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by sterlind in "Heretic: Automatic censorship removal for language models"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>models are derived from datasets. they're treated like phonebooks (also a product of datasets) under the law - which is to say they're probably not copyrightable, since no human creativity went into them (they may be <i>violating</i> copyright as unlicensed derivative works, but that's a different matter.) both phonebooks, and LLMs, are protected by freedom of the press.<p>LLM providers are free to put guardrails on their language models, the way phonebook publishers used to omit certain phone numbers - but uncensored models, like uncensored phonebooks, can be published as well.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2025 05:34:21 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45951077</link><dc:creator>sterlind</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45951077</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45951077</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by sterlind in "Steam Machine"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>where in the world are you still on 2MB ADSL?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2025 19:27:39 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45930987</link><dc:creator>sterlind</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45930987</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45930987</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by sterlind in "The English language doesn't exist – it's just French that's badly pronounced"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>do androids dream of electric airliners?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2025 18:16:29 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45838409</link><dc:creator>sterlind</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45838409</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45838409</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by sterlind in "The English language doesn't exist – it's just French that's badly pronounced"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>it's tongue in cheek. the book is an act of mild trolling.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2025 18:14:01 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45838380</link><dc:creator>sterlind</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45838380</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45838380</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by sterlind in "Debian Technical Committee overrides systemd change"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p><i>laughs in NixOS</i><p>it's remarkable to me that NixOS manages to run so well despite breaking the FHS so thoroughly. and not just in superficial ways like not calling it /bin, I mean forsaking dynamic linking (hence /var/lib and /usr/lib), keeping man pages, resources and config bundled into the same derivation as the binary sometimes, and occasionally hacking up binary blobs to rewrite rpaths.<p>on the other hand, there's a place for legacy distros too.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2025 03:53:54 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45701256</link><dc:creator>sterlind</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45701256</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45701256</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by sterlind in "Debian Technical Committee overrides systemd change"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>jesus. what did the Amalekites do?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2025 03:45:51 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45701228</link><dc:creator>sterlind</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45701228</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45701228</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by sterlind in "Marc Benioff Says Trump Should Send Guard Troops to San Francisco"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Vault-Tec instigated WWIII to purge the surface of ordinary people, so that their handpicked management could eventually repopulate the planet.<p>I wouldn't be surprised if some tech CEOs harbor the fantasy of becoming a progenitor of the human race.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2025 05:41:31 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45555582</link><dc:creator>sterlind</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45555582</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45555582</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by sterlind in "Salesforce CEO Says National Guard Should Patrol San Francisco"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>show me, please.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2025 05:35:37 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45555548</link><dc:creator>sterlind</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45555548</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45555548</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by sterlind in "You can't build tcc from Nixpkgs if you are in the UK"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>it should be unconstitutional because it's clearly a content-based restriction of speech, meaning that regulating it entails strict scrutiny. strict scrutiny requires Texas to use the least burdensome means possible to satisfy the state's legitimate interest in preventing minors from accessing obscene content - probably a home network filter appliance parents can opt into. this is what they held in <i>Paxton v. NetChoice</i> (iirc.)<p>instead, the Court contorted themselves into holding that adults have accessing content obscene to minors without furnishing their ID isn't protected speech. porn still is protected speech, but proving your age isn't protected speech. as a result, the law is content-neutral, not content-based.. somehow.<p>it was a low point for the Court - clear activist justices legislating morality from the bench.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2025 19:46:24 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45542986</link><dc:creator>sterlind</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45542986</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45542986</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by sterlind in "Britain to introduce compulsory digital ID for workers"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I'm upset by all of it, which is why I've de-Googled.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2025 21:14:05 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45391088</link><dc:creator>sterlind</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45391088</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45391088</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by sterlind in "Britain to introduce compulsory digital ID for workers"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>consuming oxygen produced by great British trees, too! when will the freeloading stop?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2025 21:11:21 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45391066</link><dc:creator>sterlind</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45391066</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45391066</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by sterlind in "Britain to introduce compulsory digital ID for workers"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>do those state apps use Play Integrity on Android? will you be required to lock yourself into Apple or Google's walled garden in order to be a citizen?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2025 21:09:11 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45391047</link><dc:creator>sterlind</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45391047</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45391047</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by sterlind in "Denmark wants to push through Chat Control"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>am I understanding correctly that Chat Control will use AI to scan the <i>text</i> of every private message, and automatically report suspected "grooming attempts" to police? how the hell do they think that will work? does the AI know that the message recipient is a minor? that the message sender is an adult? that "want to meet up tonight?" is sent by a pedophile to a stranger's kid for an illicit rendezvous, and not by a dad to his son to work on a science fair project?<p>this is just bananas crazy. so many lives will be ruined by false positives. the chilling effect will be like an Arctic snowstorm. and any actual groomers will find ways to disable it.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2025 23:53:24 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45354398</link><dc:creator>sterlind</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45354398</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45354398</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by sterlind in "Denmark wants to push through Chat Control"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>we're viewed as a social contagion. trans kids see that trans people exist, and realize they can transition too. their parents see their sweet little angel becoming something they don't understand, something that viscerally disgusts them, and the mama bear instincts activate. they steel themselves to purge our degeneracy in the name of protecting their children.<p>at least that's my take.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2025 23:41:10 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45354293</link><dc:creator>sterlind</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45354293</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45354293</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by sterlind in "Denmark wants to push through Chat Control"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>what passport are you trading?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2025 23:34:48 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45354240</link><dc:creator>sterlind</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45354240</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45354240</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by sterlind in "YouTube says it'll bring back creators banned for Covid and election content"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I'd certainly consider an ISP refusing to route my packets as silencing. is YouTube so different? legally, sure, but practically?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2025 23:33:46 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45354228</link><dc:creator>sterlind</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45354228</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45354228</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by sterlind in "YouTube says it'll bring back creators banned for Covid and election content"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>it was an extreme time, but yes, probably the most authoritarian action I've seen social media take.<p>misinformation is a real and worsening problem, but censorship makes conspiracies flourish, and establishes platforms as arbiters of truth. that "truth" will shift with the political tides.<p>IMO we need to teach kids how to identify misinformation in school. maybe by creating fake articles, mixing them with real articles and having students track down sources and identify flaws. critical thinking lessons.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2025 23:31:08 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45354215</link><dc:creator>sterlind</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45354215</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45354215</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by sterlind in "Denmark wants to push through Chat Control"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I'm an American, and our politicians are starting to discuss forcibly institutionalizing all trans people. living my days out in a padded cell is not my idea of liberty, thank you. I'm getting out of here.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2025 21:26:15 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45352959</link><dc:creator>sterlind</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45352959</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45352959</guid></item></channel></rss>