And yeah, you also can use react with no client side JS as well.

The reason that 20 minute videos are more popular these days is that more people are watching youtube on larger screens, like on their TV on the couch, and so more reliably watch longer videos than in the past.

It doesn't even get that far: Rust guarantees that things drop in reverse order of declaration, full stop.

One interesting wrinkle here: for struct members, Rust does the opposite of what C++ does. We debated changing it to match, but

> there might be unsafe code relying on drop-order which the borrow checker would be oblivious to.

There was no super real compelling argument to choose one direction over the other in the abstract, and "be the same as C++" was not considered important enough to risk breaking unsafe code that relied on the (what was at the time) implementation defined behavior.

Depends on the semantics of the programming language itself. For some languages, it is truly an optimization, for some, it is required, and does meaningfully change observed semantics.

Yes, custom hardware is a significant part of Oxide. You have to build your own to do that stuff, and that’s why they did. I alluded to some of the things upthread.

I found out about this round from this thread, just like everybody else, but

> Oxide having to raise money multiple times might be a hint

That’s not the only reason to raise a round, by far, especially when you, you know, are building custom hardware. It isn’t a SaaS business.

EDIT: here’s another commentor with an example of this: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49176704

An in-house team is most likely competing with something like Dell or VMware, not really Oxide. A significant part of Oxide’s value proposition is that you’re buying hardware and software purpose built for each other. Unless you’re also going to go so far as to do all of that, which companies like Google do, of course, it’s not really the same thing.

This matters when your various vendors start pointing at each other when something goes wrong. Oxide is truly “one throat to choke” in a way others just aren’t, and stand by that quality.

(Not to mention other various efficiencies, like power, or removing things like the BIOS and BMC junk that’s in basically every other server you buy right now. And the ability to send attenuation from boot up through the host OS. Just tons of things they’re differentiated on that your in house team just isn’t going to do.)

I am still a huge fan and supporter of Oxide, and I'm really glad to see them still doing well.

> We are not “rewriting the browser”. That's impossible. Put down the gun.