Or do they keep it on their private, warded off storage?

(1) https://apnews.com/article/ai-anthropic-copyright-settlement...

I managed even the orchestrator to NOT read the plan whole, at once, but in sections.

The most useful thing is the task ledger the task agent leaves behind, which alongside its structured status message makes a very resilient handoff between all stages.

I now feel a bit silly but I reinvented the wheel during my last lil project and indeed found it very powerful. A variant of it is the "implementation (handover) prompt" when I conclude the planning session with plans and design documents, updated handoff, clean tree and a file for a new Opus implementing orchestrator (unusually do a single, highly specific implementer and a single, highly specific tester).

After implementation and task-level tests I end up with a long and very detailed implementation progress ledger and a summary findings from the orchestrator.

Then in the new session I do the whole branch tests.

Works really well, uses much less tokens than any other approach with more of Opus and very little repetitions/corrections.

Sharing unedited documentation like this is sloppy and speaks for itself ("I can't be bothered to control it"). Leaving readme only to agents is no class, since an alternative is one line of reference to the complete documentation for bots - no need to hijack the repo's first document designation with _that_.

Slop is excessively redundant. Basically "purple prose" of the technical documentation.

But primarily: if its not worth writing, its not worth reading.

(I use Claude to prepare half of my technical documentation but then i review EVERY single file. And every single one gets extensively edited despite being coherent from the outset. I just feel like it would be disrespectful to get LLM spit something out and ask my colleagues to read it. Like.... come on.)

So this is good maybe if you're using it to sent from your laptop to your phone.

Why do you _not_ believe it's a possibility?

It's XR, for them it's a notes app in the convenient place, for me it might be a next meeting reminder on the wall next to my work screen, so I can work less distracted and more focused.

Why is their way of enriching their connected life a problem?

I think some of the worst attitudes on this website is projecting own worst case scenarios and implying bad intentions to the most innocuous or honest signals. That's the problem much bigger than someone's glasses - you support polarisation and teaming (us vs them) instead of seeking connection or understanding.

And unless I see proponents of the wholesale ban to foam at people holding smartphones equipped with cameras, I think it's safe to assume they didn't think their opinion carefully and honestly.

They do the same with cameras. They even post creep shots. Do you call out loudly everyone owning a smartphone with a camera?

Why not?

Not everyone has the most perverted thoughts in their mind all the time.

Modafinil is extremely easy and cheap to get for anyone with one eye and one working finger, Adderall a tiny bit harder but easy for a "trader".

"Possibly every smart drug, including modafinil" is just many guesses mixed up, nothing to actually discuss with. I'll stop wasting electrons here, you do you.