And I point out the attitude because I've seen it for decades and seen the harm this kind of "it's just harmless extra info" type thinking has brought. I don't know what tone you're reading into it, but I'm quite literally and explicitly criticizing the attitude, not you personally.

This is the type of attitude that kept most Unix tools quite user-unfriendly for several decades. What information to show the user, and when, are important design decisions to make. Just dumping it all on the user and making them wade through it is not doing the user a favour. Thankfully newer tools seem to be better about this, which has brought the Unix shell forward by leaps, even if there's still ways to go. (You can still make a conscious design decision that the info needs to be all there, and git is one of tools where that's at least somewhat justifiable, but a lot of the time the attitude is more like in the quoted text, that dumping out more info is always better.)

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48483326

Points: 7

# Comments: 2

> to have the notebooks play nicely with the existing package environment system instead of being self-contained

isn't that just a `Pkg.activate` away? https://plutojl.org/en/docs/packages-advanced/

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48325030

Points: 6

# Comments: 0

Pretty hilarious, but also not that much of an exaggeration from other more "serious" PRs like this.

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48187102

Points: 4

# Comments: 1

I've come to expect that "The Future Of XYZ" titles from software companies means severely limiting XYZ or preparing XYZ for a shut down!

Does anyone have a general idea of if $65m is typical, or larger or smaller than the usual funding amounts for these kinds of industry targeted "boring" software?

Despite the framing, I think Dyad's role is more to fill in the areas where Simulink is a pain to use and has been wrangled into shape for lack of better options, than to replace it. The agentic part can be a big pull though, if they can get it to reliably produce what the user, eg. the engineer, asked for, without having to spend more time correcting it than they'd have spent writing or laying it out. Seems plausible because this is a specialized niche-purpose AI, but still not 100% certain it can get there IMO.

What makes one cringe and another recognize as familiar and comfortable is also pretty subtle and hard to define. These things need nuanced descriptions and examples to actually get right, and it's in understanding those nuances and figuring out the register of the examples that Grok outshines the others.

Grok seems in general better at being "human" in ways that are hard to define: for eg. if I ask it "does this message roughly convey things correctly, to the level it can given this length", it will likely answer like a human would (either a yes or a change suggestion that sticks to the tone and length), while Chatgpt would write a dissertation on the message that still doesn't clear anything up.

Recently I've noticed that Grok seems to have gotten really good at dictation too (that feature where you click the mic to ask it something). Chatgpt has like 90-95% accuracy with my accent, the speech input on Android's Gboard something like 75%, Grok surprisingly gets something like 98% of my words correct.

Hearing about positive personnel shift like this now gives me a bunch more optimism on this. I really hope I can go back to the days of unambiguously being in support of Mozilla and their many awesome efforts, without always having to be a bit dubious about their next (mis)step.

I'm also interested in the mechanics of how you actually do it: for eg. your mention of paper maps for travel makes me think if a lot of that becomes workable because you're in planned cities with reliable maps. I'm a mid sized town in India where maps are vague guides for the general layout, but are missing the many many alleys and connecting roads that people actually live on (or have shops at). Roads, road names, traffic restrictions - pretty much every part of it is chaotic and incredibly hard to put together without a GPS on a digital map.

On the family aspect too, do you have a Matrix or similar for the larger family to connect through and share news on (their own travel for eg., or difficulties they might be having, or news like child birth), or do you only use phone calls or texts to connect?

In any case, I can definitely relate to:

> even worse, you are mentally always ready to be contacted, for a new dopamine hit of information or a new decision to make.

and feel the negative effects of that, so I'll be moving actively towards what you're suggesting. Maybe to a different point on the line and with different workarounds, but it sounds at least 90% workable and with significant benefits too.