<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: surajguptayc</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=surajguptayc</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 10:00:16 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=surajguptayc" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by surajguptayc in "An open-source stethoscope that costs between $2.5 and $5 to produce"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Interesting project.<p>Feels like the real value here is not beating commercial stethoscopes, but accessibility and local manufacturing. even if performance is slightly worse, being able to produce something “good enough at scale in low-resource environments could still have huge impact.<p>Curious though has anyone tested consistency across multiple prints? I’d expect variation in material + print quality to affect acoustic performance quite a bit.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 06:04:11 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47958746</link><dc:creator>surajguptayc</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47958746</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47958746</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by surajguptayc in "I built a real-time AR plane spotter, here's the math that makes it work"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>cool</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2026 14:29:38 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47824572</link><dc:creator>surajguptayc</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47824572</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47824572</guid></item></channel></rss>