TL;DR Byd is amazing and fatally flawed. The details are too much to place here.

This is the year when solo software firms start to dominate.

Moving my head to see everything doesn't bother me. I also have a setup with 3 32" 4k which I find a little too wide but in that setup 1 monitor connects to different computer.

DeepSeek is a valuable product, but its open-source nature makes it difficult to displace larger competitors. Any advancements can be quickly adopted, and in fact, it may inadvertently strengthen these companies by highlighting weaknesses in their current strategies.

Basically, when network connectivity increases, the "bad" nodes can overwhelm the "good" nodes. The other ideas discussed are really interesting; well worth watching.

into the wallets back to the victims?

from the wallets forward to the others working with the scammer?

1) Don't ask for large / complex change. Ask for a plan but ask it to implement the plan in small steps and ask the model to test each step before starting the next.

2) For really complex steps, ask the model to write code to visualize the problem and solution.

3) If the model fails on a given step, ask it to add logging to the code, save the logs, run the tests and the review the logs to determine what went wrong. Do this repeatedly until the step works well.

4) Ask the model to look at your existing code and determine how it was designed to implement a task. Some times the model will put all of the changes in one file but your code has a cleaner design the model doesn't take into account.

I've seen other people blog about their tricks and tips. I do still see garbage results but not as high as 95%.

I wonder if we can use an LLM to deeply analyze and fix the flaws.